We first point out that nonrelativistic quantum mechanics formulated at imaginary time s = it can formally be recognized as the Fokker-Planck description of a classical Brownian motion, which occurs (in general) in a medium where particles are absorbed and emitted. We next offer a new formulation of quantum dynamics, which is basically the Langevin treatment of that Brownian motion. More explicitly, we derive a noise average representation of the transition probability W ( X", s"|X', s' ) in terms of the solutions to a Langevin equation with a Gaussian white noise. Upon analytic continuation back to real time W ( X", s"|X', s' ) becomes the propagator of the original Schrödinger equation, namely we have ⟨ X", t"|X', t' ⟩ = W ( X", it"|X', it' ). The main advantage of this approach is to permit a systematic application to quantum-dynamical problems of the mathematical techniques developed in the theory of classical stochastic processes, even when vector potentials and/or time-dependent potentials are present.
As an application of the recently proposed Langevin formulation of quantum dynamics, we quantize the time-dependent harmonic oscillator. In this way, we are able to explicitly compute the quantum-mechanical propagator. At variance with previous results, the expression found in this letter contains no auxiliary function to be determined by solving (as yet unsolved) non-linear differential equations, but it is written in terms of two series which arise quite naturally within the present formalism. Our strategy is compared with ordinary time-dependent perturbation theory.
We discuss how the semiclassical approximation arises within the (classically improved) Langevin quantization. We derive a new representation of the semiclassical propagator (at imaginary time) in the form of a white noise average, which is valid over an arbitrary (imaginary) time interval. Although our result is ultimately equivalent to the standard representation of the semiclassical propagator, it nevertheless turns out to be more advantageous in dealing with certain problems that involve tunnelling and metastability.
The recently proposed Langevin formulation of quantum dynamics yields the propagator at imaginary time as a noise average involving the solutions to a certain Langevin equation with a Gaussian white noise. The main advantage of this approach is to permit a stochastic treatment of quantum systems even when no solutions to the Schrödinger equation are known. We show how the Langevin formulation works in the space of a (nonrelativistic) particle in a uniform magnetic field with arbitary time dependence. We are able to evaluate the quantum-mechanical propagator exactly. As far as we know, this is a new result of considerable interest for atomic and molecular physics.
An earlier study of quantum-mechanical time has suggested that, from the quantum-theoretic point of view, time is a random variable. The present work explores how such a description of time can be used to bring greater detail into the analysis of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. Specifically, the classical equations for harmonic motion are used as a point transformation between phase space and time-energy space, permitting probability distributions in the two spaces to be different representations of the same thing. The familiar energy-quantization hypothesis is supplemented with the hypothesis that quantized energy values are means (averages) of energy distributions characteristic of each energy state. With the probability distribution of time determined from the previously cited study, the desired quantized energy distributions follow from the requirements: (1) that they should be normalized, non-negative, and with means equal to the quantized energy values; (2) that the equivalent representation of distribution in position-momentum space should have marginal densities that are proportional (except near the origin) to the densities in position and momentum, ${|\ensuremath{\phi}(q)|}^{2}$ and ${|\ensuremath{\psi}(p)|}^{2}$, which are postulated in quantum theory. Requirement (2) is a weakening of the Born postulate. In the time-energy space, the probability distributions exclude energies smaller than the mode (energy value with maximum probability). In position-momentum space this exclusion requirement becomes the dynamical restriction: $\frac{{q}^{2}m{\ensuremath{\omega}}^{2}}{2}+\frac{{p}^{2}}{2m}\ensuremath{\ge}\frac{{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{n}\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}}{2}$, where, for the first three energy states, ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{0}=0$, ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{1}=\frac{3}{2}$, ${\ensuremath{\Lambda}}_{2}=2+\ensuremath{\surd}\frac{3}{2}$. In general terms it is thus shown that the quantized harmonic oscillator can be described as a statistical ensemble of classical oscillators. Some comparisons with work on phase-space formulations of quantum mechanics (especially with the work of Wigner) are made and some aspects of the theory that should submit to experimental verification are pointed out.
The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is a cornerstone of quantum physics and governs all phenomena of the microscopic world. However, despite its importance, its origin is still not widely appreciated and properly understood. The quantization of the forced harmonic oscillator is studied with the quantum variable (
x ,
v^) , with the commutation relation [
x ,
v^] =
iℏ/
m , and using a Schrödinger’s like equation on these variable, and associating a linear operator to a constant of motion
K(
x,v,t) of the classical system, The comparison with the quantization in the space (
x,p) is done with the usual Schrödinger’s equation for the Hamiltonian
H(
x,p,t), and with the commutation relation [
x ,
p^] =
iℏ. It is found that for the non-resonant case, both forms of quantization bring about the same result. The difference means that the H-approach case brings about more complex behavior in the quantum dynamics than the K-approach case, and that the H-approach case losses more information than the K-approach case.However, for the resonant case, both forms of quantization are different, and the probability for the system to be in the exited state for the (
x ,
v^) quantization has fewer oscillations than the (
x ,
p^) quantization, the average energy of the system is higher in (
x ,
p^) quantization than on the (
x ,
v^) quantization, and the Boltzmann- Shannon entropy on the (
x ,
p^) quantization is higher than on the (
x ,
v^) quantization. The parameter does not appear to be suitable for experimental measurement because the variation in the average value of the energy is quite modest. Entropy is a nice parameter to investigate experimentally because it differs significantly.