Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Classical solution of the equations of motion in the quantum theory of Fermi fields

Konstantin Alekseevich Sveshnikov

Published Jul 1, 1988• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01029426

Related papers

Solutions of the equations of motion in classical and quantum theories

Iwo Białynicki‐Birula

Annals of Physics•Sep 1, 1971•27 citations

Solutions of the equations of motion in classical and quantum theories

Theoretical Physics

Annals of Physics•Jun 1, 1971•0 citations

Small Oscillation Theory of the Interaction of a Particle and Scalar Field

Eugene P. Gross

We study the interaction of a nonrelativistic particle with a scalar field, with particular application to the theory of polarons. The approach is based on a general classical method for the integration of equations of motion. The Hamiltonian is transformed by successive canonical transformations, the first corresponding to describing the motion relative to special solutions of the equations of motion. This stage as applied to suitably ordered Heisenberg equations of motion is identical with intermediate coupling theory. The second transformation treats the coupled small oscillations of particle and field oscillators about the chosen special solution. This affords a natural extension of intermediate coupling theory for this problem. Differences between the classical and quantum theories arise in the ordering of operators; the differences play a crucial role in determining the effective cutoff in wave vector space.

Physical Review•Dec 15, 1955•45 citations

Spin in Classical and Quantum Theory

Herbert C. Corben

The classical equations of motion of a charged point-particle with intrinsic spin under the influence of an external electromagnetic field are restated and compared with the Heisenberg equations of motion derived from the Dirac theory. The partition of angular momentum between particle and field in the classical theory is contrasted to the Dirac theory of electron spin. The analogy between the Dirac equation and the theory of parametric amplification is pointed out.A free spinning point particle moving according to the laws of classical relativistic point-particle mechanics may move along a helix. The sum of the intrinsic spin $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and the angular momentum of the helical motion in this classical analog of zitterbewegung is an effective spin vector S which is a constant of the motion. Because of this internal motion, the effective mass $M$ of the particle differs from the mass $m$ which is ascribed to it in the equations of motion. Solutions are found in which S is parallel or antiparallel to the momentum, and the sign of $M$ is determined by the helicity. When placed in a uniform electromagnetic field, the particle behaves as if it had a rest mass $M$ and a magnetic moment $\frac{e\ensuremath{\sigma}}{\mathrm{Mc}}$, in addition to any explicit magnetic moment that may be ascribed to it.

Physical Review•Mar 15, 1961•82 citations

QUANTUM MEANING OF CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY FOR FERMI SYSTEMS

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 1, 1985•0 citations

Classical particles with spin. I. The WKBJ approximation

John J. Stachel, Jerzy F Plebanski

This is the first of a series of papers developing the classical theory of a spinning particle. The equations of motion will be derived from a Lagrangian, and solutions for the classical trajectory and spin precession in external fields will be given. In this paper an abstract spin vector is introduced to characterize the spin of a classical particle. Lagrangians for the classical trajectories and for the motion of the abstract spin vector are derived from corresponding quantum-mechanical Lagrangians by the WKBJ approximation method for nonrelativistic and relativistic particles. The equations of motion for the trajectory and the abstract spin vector following from the extremalization of these Lagrangians are given. The equations of motion for the precession in an external electromagnetic field of the spin vector (or tensor) in space–time is derived from the equations of motion for the abstract spin vector. In the relativistic case, they are equivalent to the Bargmann–Michel–Telegdi equations [Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 435 (1959)]. The relationship between the ensemble and single-particle points of view is also elucidated.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1977•13 citations
We study the interaction of a nonrelativistic particle with a scalar field, with particular application to the theory of polarons. The approach is based on a general classical method for the integration of equations of motion. The Hamiltonian is transformed by successive canonical transformations, the first corresponding to describing the motion relative to special solutions of the equations of motion. This stage as applied to suitably ordered Heisenberg equations of motion is identical with intermediate coupling theory. The second transformation treats the coupled small oscillations of particle and field oscillators about the chosen special solution. This affords a natural extension of intermediate coupling theory for this problem. Differences between the classical and quantum theories arise in the ordering of operators; the differences play a crucial role in determining the effective cutoff in wave vector space.
The classical equations of motion of a charged point-particle with intrinsic spin under the influence of an external electromagnetic field are restated and compared with the Heisenberg equations of motion derived from the Dirac theory. The partition of angular momentum between particle and field in the classical theory is contrasted to the Dirac theory of electron spin. The analogy between the Dirac equation and the theory of parametric amplification is pointed out.A free spinning point particle moving according to the laws of classical relativistic point-particle mechanics may move along a helix. The sum of the intrinsic spin $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and the angular momentum of the helical motion in this classical analog of zitterbewegung is an effective spin vector S which is a constant of the motion. Because of this internal motion, the effective mass MMM of the particle differs from the mass mmm which is ascribed to it in the equations of motion. Solutions are found in which S is parallel or antiparallel to the momentum, and the sign of MMM is determined by the helicity. When placed in a uniform electromagnetic field, the particle behaves as if it had a rest mass MMM and a magnetic moment $\frac{e\ensuremath{\sigma}}{\mathrm{Mc}}$, in addition to any explicit magnetic moment that may be ascribed to it.
This is the first of a series of papers developing the classical theory of a spinning particle. The equations of motion will be derived from a Lagrangian, and solutions for the classical trajectory and spin precession in external fields will be given. In this paper an abstract spin vector is introduced to characterize the spin of a classical particle. Lagrangians for the classical trajectories and for the motion of the abstract spin vector are derived from corresponding quantum-mechanical Lagrangians by the WKBJ approximation method for nonrelativistic and relativistic particles. The equations of motion for the trajectory and the abstract spin vector following from the extremalization of these Lagrangians are given. The equations of motion for the precession in an external electromagnetic field of the spin vector (or tensor) in space–time is derived from the equations of motion for the abstract spin vector. In the relativistic case, they are equivalent to the Bargmann–Michel–Telegdi equations [Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 435 (1959)]. The relationship between the ensemble and single-particle points of view is also elucidated.