Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal de physique

WKB calculation of quantum adiabatic phases and nonadiabatic corrections

Carl M. Bender, N. Papanicolaou

Published Jan 1, 1988• 10 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Berry discovered that wave functions may acquire a geometrical phase factor, in addition to the usual dynamical phase, during an adiabatic cycle with period T. The dynamical and Berry phases are here recognized as the first two terms in a systematic WKB expansion in powers of ε = 1/ T. We thus provide a simple method for the calculation of adiabatic phases and for a consistent inclusion of nonadiabatic corrections.

DOI
10.1051/jphys:01988004904056100

Related papers

On geometric phases and dynamical invariants

Diana Monteoliva, H. J. Korsch, J A Nunez

A formalism is developed for calculating Berry phases for nonadiabatic time-periodic quantum systems when a dynamical invariant is known. It is found that, when the invariant is periodic and has a nondegenerate spectrum, this method allows a convenient way to obtain generalized Berry phases and the proper cyclic initial states. The method is applied to the generalized harmonic oscillator and the two-level system, where the invariant operators are explicitly constructed. Formulae for the conventional Berry's phases are readily obtained by taking the adiabatic limit of the exact results.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 21, 1994•74 citations

Beyond the quantum adiabatic approximation: Adiabatic perturbation theory

Gustavo Rigolin, Gerardo Ortíz, V. H. Ponce

We introduce a perturbative approach to solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, named adiabatic perturbation theory (APT), whose zeroth-order term is the quantum adiabatic approximation. The small parameter in the power series expansion of the time-dependent wave function is the inverse of the time it takes to drive the system's Hamiltonian from the initial to its final form. We review other standard perturbative and nonperturbative ways of going beyond the adiabatic approximation, extending and finding exact relations among them, and also compare the efficiency of those methods against the APT. Most importantly, we determine APT corrections to the Berry phase by use of the Aharonov-Anandan geometric phase. We then solve several time-dependent problems, allowing us to illustrate that the APT is the only perturbative method that gives the right corrections to the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we propose an experiment to measure the APT corrections to the Berry phase and show, for a particular spin-$1∕2$ problem, that to first order in APT the geometric phase should be two and a half times the (adiabatic) Berry phase.

arXiv:0807.1363•Physical Review A•Nov 18, 2008•133 citations

Nonadiabatic Berry Phase of a Two-State System and Nonstationarity of Quantum States

Yian Lei, J. Y. Zeng

The nonadiabatic Berry phases in the magnetic resonance under various initial conditions are investigated and compared with the adiabatic Berry phase. The general formalism for calculating the nonadiabatic Berry phase of a two-state system in terms of the expansion of instantaneous energy eigenstates is presented. Some numerical calculations and discussions are made. The Berry phase of a two-statesystem under an impulsive interaction is addressed.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Jun 15, 1997•1 citation

Nonadiabatic factor accompanying magnetic translation of a charged particle

J. Chee

The quantum adiabatic theorem incorporating the Berry phase phenomenon can be characterized as a factorization of the time evolution operator into a path-dependent geometric factor, a usual dynamical factor and a non-adiabatic factor that approaches the identity in the adiabatic limit. We study a case where all these three factors can be constructed explicitly and where the instantaneous Hamiltonian has infinitely degenerate energy eigenstates associated with magnetic translation symmetry. Significance of the non-adiabatic factor in terms of transition probabilities is discussed.

arXiv:0708.3726•Aug 28, 2007•0 citations

Berry-like phases in structured atoms and molecules

Edmund Meyer, A. E. Leanhardt, Eric Cornell +1 more

Quantum mechanical phases arising from a periodically varying Hamiltonian are considered. These phases are derived from the eigenvalues of a stationary, ``dressed'' Hamiltonian that is able to treat internal atomic or molecular structure in addition to the time variation. In the limit of an adiabatic time variation, the usual Berry phase is recovered. For more rapid variation, nonadiabatic corrections to the Berry phase are recovered in perturbation theory, and their explicit dependence on internal structure emerges. Simple demonstrations of this formalism are given, to particles containing interacting spins, and to molecules in electric fields.

arXiv:0909.2061•Physical Review A•Dec 15, 2009•19 citations

High-order adiabatic approximations related to non-Abelian Berry's phase factors and nuclear quadrupole resonance

Chang-Pu Sun

A high-order adiabatic-approximation method is proposed to study the time evolution of degenerate quantum-mechanical systems with slowly changing Hamiltonians. We not only discuss the quantum adiabatic theorem, induced gauge structure, and non-Abelian Berry's phase factors in the first-order approximation, but we also give nonadiabatic corrections for problems in the second-order approximation. With the nuclear quadrupole resonance as an explicit example, we analyze the above-mentioned questions in detail and point out the observable effects of non-Abelian Berry's phase factors for nonadiabatic transitions between two instantaneous states in an improvement of Tycko's experiment.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Feb 15, 1990•35 citations
Berry discovered that wave functions may acquire a geometrical phase factor, in addition to the usual dynamical phase, during an adiabatic cycle with period T. The dynamical and Berry phases are here recognized as the first two terms in a systematic WKB expansion in powers of ε = 1/ T. We thus provide a simple method for the calculation of adiabatic phases and for a consistent inclusion of nonadiabatic corrections.
A formalism is developed for calculating Berry phases for nonadiabatic time-periodic quantum systems when a dynamical invariant is known. It is found that, when the invariant is periodic and has a nondegenerate spectrum, this method allows a convenient way to obtain generalized Berry phases and the proper cyclic initial states. The method is applied to the generalized harmonic oscillator and the two-level system, where the invariant operators are explicitly constructed. Formulae for the conventional Berry's phases are readily obtained by taking the adiabatic limit of the exact results.
We introduce a perturbative approach to solving the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, named adiabatic perturbation theory (APT), whose zeroth-order term is the quantum adiabatic approximation. The small parameter in the power series expansion of the time-dependent wave function is the inverse of the time it takes to drive the system's Hamiltonian from the initial to its final form. We review other standard perturbative and nonperturbative ways of going beyond the adiabatic approximation, extending and finding exact relations among them, and also compare the efficiency of those methods against the APT. Most importantly, we determine APT corrections to the Berry phase by use of the Aharonov-Anandan geometric phase. We then solve several time-dependent problems, allowing us to illustrate that the APT is the only perturbative method that gives the right corrections to the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we propose an experiment to measure the APT corrections to the Berry phase and show, for a particular spin-1∕21∕21∕2 problem, that to first order in APT the geometric phase should be two and a half times the (adiabatic) Berry phase.
The quantum adiabatic theorem incorporating the Berry phase phenomenon can be characterized as a factorization of the time evolution operator into a path-dependent geometric factor, a usual dynamical factor and a non-adiabatic factor that approaches the identity in the adiabatic limit. We study a case where all these three factors can be constructed explicitly and where the instantaneous Hamiltonian has infinitely degenerate energy eigenstates associated with magnetic translation symmetry. Significance of the non-adiabatic factor in terms of transition probabilities is discussed.
Quantum mechanical phases arising from a periodically varying Hamiltonian are considered. These phases are derived from the eigenvalues of a stationary, ``dressed'' Hamiltonian that is able to treat internal atomic or molecular structure in addition to the time variation. In the limit of an adiabatic time variation, the usual Berry phase is recovered. For more rapid variation, nonadiabatic corrections to the Berry phase are recovered in perturbation theory, and their explicit dependence on internal structure emerges. Simple demonstrations of this formalism are given, to particles containing interacting spins, and to molecules in electric fields.
A high-order adiabatic-approximation method is proposed to study the time evolution of degenerate quantum-mechanical systems with slowly changing Hamiltonians. We not only discuss the quantum adiabatic theorem, induced gauge structure, and non-Abelian Berry's phase factors in the first-order approximation, but we also give nonadiabatic corrections for problems in the second-order approximation. With the nuclear quadrupole resonance as an explicit example, we analyze the above-mentioned questions in detail and point out the observable effects of non-Abelian Berry's phase factors for nonadiabatic transitions between two instantaneous states in an improvement of Tycko's experiment.