Physical Review A
Nonlinear effects in quantum dissipation
David Vitali, Paolo Grigolini A
Abstract
We study a two-level system linearly interacting with a set of quantum-mechanical oscillators, referred to as the ``bath.'' This system is formally equivalent to a magnetic dipole, with spin 1/2, precessing with the Larmor frequency ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\omega}}}_{0}$ around a fixed magnetic field along the z axis and undergoing the influence of a fluctuating field along the x axis. These bath fluctuations are not independent of the state of the spin, and the crucial problem to be studied in this paper is precisely how to take the reaction field, i.e., the influence of the bath on the system, into account. We find a general result based on neglecting a contribution to the reaction field proportional to ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}_{\mathit{x}}$(t)-〈${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}_{\mathit{x}}$(t)〉, where the angle brackets denote averaging on both the spin and the bath space, with a density matrix corresponding to the spin polarized along the x axis. We show that under the special condition that the spin does not significantly depart from its initial state, our general result turns out to coincide with the noninteracting-blip approximation (NBA) of Leggett and co-workers [Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987)]. When we make the assumption that both quantum and thermal fluctuations of the bath can be neglected and that the time scale of the bath is virtually zero (adiabatic assumption), our general result turns out to coincide with the prediction of the discrete nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (DNSE) of Davydov and Kislukha [Phys. Status Solidi B 59, 465 (1973)] and Davydov $[---Biology and Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1982)] in the two-sites case.This means that the nonlinear effects proven by Kenkre and co-workers [Phys. Rev. B 34, 4959 (1986); 35, 1473 (1987)] to accompany a significant departure of the spin from the initial state are lost by the NBA. On the other hand, our approach provides a rigorous evaluation of the effects of the oscillator fluctuations on the predictions of the DNSE. It is shown that the quantum fluctuations might have a significant role also in the region of high temperature to which the nonadiabatic corrections of Kenkre and co-workers apply. Finally, it is shown that a still more accurate approximation would be that of neglecting a reaction field proportional to ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}_{\mathit{x}}$(t)-〈${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}_{\mathit{x}}$(t)${\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{s}}$, where 〈${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}_{\mathit{x}}$(t)${\mathrm{〉}}_{\mathit{s}}$ denotes an average carried out only on the spin space. This approximation leads our approach to coincide with the exact result in the special case where both the spin and its bath are replaced by their classical counterparts. Under this approximation, the detrapping would be equivalent to an Arrhenius-like thermal-activation process. When the coupling strength between the system and its bath is decreased, the spin is expected to depart from the initial trapped state. The dynamics of this process is expected to be influenced by the joint action of the bath fluctuations (both thermal and quantum mechanical) and of the nonlinearity stemming from the reaction field, and ignored by the NBA. This intriguing problem should be the subject of further investigations.