Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Rejoinder: Comments on a paper by Gruber

B. V. Landau

Published Dec 1, 1973• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00709118

Related papers

Discussion: Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•17 citations

Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Reply to the Comment of E. A. Cornell

Erling Riis, S. M. Barnett

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Jun 1, 1995•3 citations

Rejoinder to the Response to ‘Comment on a recent conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model’

Fa Yueh Wu, Barry M. McCoy, Michael Ellis Fisher +1 more

We add here a few sentences concerning the author's Response 1 to our Comment 2 criticizing his original claims regarding his conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model 3. First, we ...

arXiv:0812.2837•The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics•Sep 11, 2008•16 citations

Comment on Torben M. Andersen's Paper

Pekka Ilmakunnas

Physica-Verlag eBooks•Sep 16, 2005•0 citations

Rejoinder to the Response to the Comment on ‘Conjectures on exact solution of three-dimensional (3D) simple orthorhombic Ising lattices’

Jacques H. H. Perk

It is shown that the arguments in the reply of Z.-D. Zhang defending his conjectures are invalid. His conjectures have been thoroughly disproved.

arXiv:0901.2935•The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics•Mar 18, 2009•8 citations