Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Pramana

Observing SU(2) phases with neutrons

Veer Chand Rakhecha, Apoorva G. Wagh

Published Feb 1, 2001• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s12043-001-0125-6

Related papers

SU (2) phase jumps and geometric phases

Rajendra Bhandari

Physics Letters A•Jul 1, 1991•68 citations

Proton-neutron random phase approximation studied by the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model in the SU(2) $\times$ SU(2)

Futoshi Minato

We study the proton-neutron RPA with an extended Lipikin-Meshkov-Glick model. We pay attention to the effect of correlated ground state and the case in which neutron and proton numbers are different. The effect of the correlated ground state are tested on the basis of quasi-boson approximation. We obtain the result that RPA excitation energies and transition strengths are in a good agreement with the exact solution up to a certain strength of the particle-particle interaction. However, the transition strength becomes worse if we consider the case in which neutron and proton numbers are different even at a weak particle-particle interaction.

arXiv:1612.00173•Dec 1, 2016•0 citations

Test of the proton-neutron random-phase approximation method within an extended Lipkin-type model

Sabin Stoica, I. Mihut, J. Suhonen

An extended Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model for testing the proton-neutron random-phase approximation $(pn\mathrm{RPA})$ method is developed, taking into account explicitly proton and neutron degrees of freedom. Besides the proton and neutron single-particle terms two types of residual proton-neutron interactions, one simulating a particle-particle and the other a particle-hole interaction, are included in the model Hamiltonian so that the model is exactly solvable in an isospin $\mathrm{SU}(2)\ensuremath{\bigotimes}\mathrm{SU}(2)$ basis. The behavior of the first excited (collective) state obtained by (i) exact diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix and (ii) with the $\mathrm{pn}\mathrm{RPA}$ is studied as a function of the model parameters and the two results are compared with each other. Furthermore, charge-changing operators simulating nuclear beta decay and their action on eigenfunctions of the model Hamiltonian are defined and transition amplitudes of them are calculated using exact, the Tamm-Dancoff, and $\mathrm{pn}\mathrm{RPA}$ eigenfunctions.

Physical Review C•Jun 1, 2001•5 citations

New features of some proton–neutron collective states

Apolodor Aristotel Raduta, C. M. Raduta, B. Codirla

arXiv:nucl-th/0503041•Nuclear Physics A•Oct 1, 2000•5 citations

Quantal phase in split-beam interferometry

Erik Sjöqvist

An experiment to verify the phase in noncyclic SU(2) spatial evolution of split-beam interferometry using spin-polarized neutrons is proposed.Received 5 May 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.035602©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Feb 14, 2001•7 citations

Quantum physics with neutrons

Apoorva G. Wagh, Veer Chand Rakhecha

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics•Jan 1, 1996•20 citations
Proton-neutron random phase approximation studied by the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model in the SU(2) ×\times× SU(2)
We study the proton-neutron RPA with an extended Lipikin-Meshkov-Glick model. We pay attention to the effect of correlated ground state and the case in which neutron and proton numbers are different. The effect of the correlated ground state are tested on the basis of quasi-boson approximation. We obtain the result that RPA excitation energies and transition strengths are in a good agreement with the exact solution up to a certain strength of the particle-particle interaction. However, the transition strength becomes worse if we consider the case in which neutron and proton numbers are different even at a weak particle-particle interaction.
An extended Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model for testing the proton-neutron random-phase approximation (pnRPA)(pn\mathrm{RPA})(pnRPA) method is developed, taking into account explicitly proton and neutron degrees of freedom. Besides the proton and neutron single-particle terms two types of residual proton-neutron interactions, one simulating a particle-particle and the other a particle-hole interaction, are included in the model Hamiltonian so that the model is exactly solvable in an isospin $\mathrm{SU}(2)\ensuremath{\bigotimes}\mathrm{SU}(2)$ basis. The behavior of the first excited (collective) state obtained by (i) exact diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix and (ii) with the pnRPA\mathrm{pn}\mathrm{RPA}pnRPA is studied as a function of the model parameters and the two results are compared with each other. Furthermore, charge-changing operators simulating nuclear beta decay and their action on eigenfunctions of the model Hamiltonian are defined and transition amplitudes of them are calculated using exact, the Tamm-Dancoff, and pnRPA\mathrm{pn}\mathrm{RPA}pnRPA eigenfunctions.