Schrödinger's sock

Ahmad Darwish, Matteo Murdaca, Jami J. Kinnunen

It is a universal empirical observation that socks become unpaired in the laundry. We propose a quasiparticle theory of sock dynamics in which individual socks are modelled as bosonic excitations of the agitated laundry condensate. The sock dispersion relation is material-dependent: nondispersive materials retain their shape, while dispersive materials give rise to the well-documented phenomenon of sock shrinkage. In the convex regions of the dispersive spectrum, socks undergo Beliaev decay and spontaneously split into two lower-momentum socks, while in the concave regions the dominant process is Landau-Khalatnikov scattering, which degrades socks into lint and loose threads. In addition, the rotating drum creates sock-antisock pairs from the laundry vacuum via the dynamical Casimir effect. The coexistence of these creation and destruction channels gives rise to a fundamental ambiguity: an unpaired sock at the end of a wash cycle is equally consistent with the destruction of its partner or the spontaneous creation of an entirely new sock.

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

James S. Bell

Introduction The philosopher in the street, who has not suffered a course in quantum mechanics, is quite unimpressed by Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen correlations. He can point to many examples of similar correlations in everyday life. The case of Bertlmann's socks is often cited. Dr. Bertlmann likes to wear two socks of different colours. Which colour he will have on a given foot on a given day is quite unpredictable. But when you see (Fig. 1) that the first sock is pink you can be already sure that the second sock will not be pink. Observation of the first, and experience of Bertlmann, gives immediate information about the second. There is no accounting for tastes, but apart from that there is no mystery here. And is not the EPR business just the same? Consider for example the particular EPR gedanken experiment of Bohm (Fig. 2). Two suitable particles, suitably prepared (in the ‘singlet spin state’), are directed from a common source towards two widely separated magnets followed by detecting screens. Each time the experiment is performed each of the two particles is deflected either up or down at the corresponding magnet. Whether either particle separately goes up or down on a given occasion is quite unpredictable. But when one particle goes up the other always goes down and vice-versa. After a little experience it is enough to look at one side to know also about the other.

Henry Pierce Stapp

Derek Steinberg

Steve Field