Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Europhysics Letters (EPL)

A note on geometric phases

Franco Salmistraro

Published Jun 15, 1998• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The usual definition of a geometric phase involves particular conditions on the behaviour of the state vector of a quantum system. We show that they can be removed in some cases by appealing directly to the Schrödinger equation. In this way we obtain an extension of a family of geometric phases previously introduced by us.
DOI
10.1209/epl/i1998-00292-4

Related papers

Family of geometric phases

Franco Salmistraro

A family of geometric phases associated with the evolution of a quantum system is introduced. These phases share the property of depending on the curve determined by the Schr\"odinger equation as well as on the choice of an orthonormal basis in the Hilbert space of states. Their role in the expansion of the wave function is examined, and a comparison with previous results about Berry phases is made. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1996•1 citation

Geometric Phases In Quantum Systems Of Pure And Mixed State

Miran Haider

Note that equations and expressions has been omitted here and is instead presented in the work. This thesis focuses on the geometric phase in pure and mixed quantum states. For the case of a pure q ...

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Topological and geometric phases

Helmut Rauch

Abstract Topological and geometrical effects appear in the solution of the Schrödinger equation due to special geometrical forms of the interaction, or due to interactions which do not result from conservative forces acting on the system (see Section 1.2). A conscientious reader may point out that all these effects could be entirely explained using the Schrödinger equation only. But the geometrical phase formalism is useful because it sometimes plays a role in fundamental quantum phenomena and it shows that additional phase factors exist which are easily overlooked, making the interpretation of measured effects more mysterious than necessary. Thus, our understand-ing of quantum mechanics has deepened since the existence of geometrical phases was explicitly revealed (Shapere and Wilczek 1989). This happened due to the seminal works of Pancharatnam (1956), Berry (1984), Anandan (1992), and Bhandari (1997). It also shows that a wavefunction often carries much more information than is usually extracted in a standard experiment. A typical example is the assumption of adiabaticity, where the magnetic moment of the neutron produces (inside a slowly varying magnetic field) a dynamical phase shift proportional to the path integral ∫ B ds, but when the direction of the field varies slowly an additional, i.e. geometrical, phase also appears. The back reaction of a quantum measurement can also be described as a kind of an induced topological phase (Aharonov et al. 1998).

•Aug 10, 2000•0 citations

Group theoretical aspects of the geometric phase in quantum mechanics.

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Geometric phases and criticality in spin systems

Jiannis K. Pachos, Angelo C. M. Carollo

A general formalism of the relation between geometric phases produced by circularly evolving interacting spin systems and their criticality behaviour is presented. This opens up the way for the use of geometric phases as a tool to probe regions of criticality without having to undergo a quantum phase transition. As a concrete example, a spin-1/2 chain with XY interactions is considered and the corresponding geometric phases are analysed. Finally, a generalization of these results to the case of an arbitrary spin system is presented.

arXiv:quant-ph/0602154•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Oct 19, 2006•30 citations

The geometric phase in photon systems

J. Lu

By using the Maxwell equations in a Schrödinger-like form, the geometric phase in photon systems is calculated. This approach provides a unified way to discuss geometric phases in both photon (massless) and other massive particle systems. The concept of parameter space is not introduced in our discussion. So all complications caused by it can be avoided. In principle, this approach can used to calculate the geometric phase in any cyclic evolution of photon systems.

The European Physical Journal D•Jan 1, 1999•9 citations
Abstract Topological and geometrical effects appear in the solution of the Schrödinger equation due to special geometrical forms of the interaction, or due to interactions which do not result from conservative forces acting on the system (see Section 1.2). A conscientious reader may point out that all these effects could be entirely explained using the Schrödinger equation only. But the geometrical phase formalism is useful because it sometimes plays a role in fundamental quantum phenomena and it shows that additional phase factors exist which are easily overlooked, making the interpretation of measured effects more mysterious than necessary. Thus, our understand-ing of quantum mechanics has deepened since the existence of geometrical phases was explicitly revealed (Shapere and Wilczek 1989). This happened due to the seminal works of Pancharatnam (1956), Berry (1984), Anandan (1992), and Bhandari (1997). It also shows that a wavefunction often carries much more information than is usually extracted in a standard experiment. A typical example is the assumption of adiabaticity, where the magnetic moment of the neutron produces (inside a slowly varying magnetic field) a dynamical phase shift proportional to the path integral ∫ B ds, but when the direction of the field varies slowly an additional, i.e. geometrical, phase also appears. The back reaction of a quantum measurement can also be described as a kind of an induced topological phase (Aharonov et al. 1998).
The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.
A general formalism of the relation between geometric phases produced by circularly evolving interacting spin systems and their criticality behaviour is presented. This opens up the way for the use of geometric phases as a tool to probe regions of criticality without having to undergo a quantum phase transition. As a concrete example, a spin-1/2 chain with XY interactions is considered and the corresponding geometric phases are analysed. Finally, a generalization of these results to the case of an arbitrary spin system is presented.