Physical Review

Separated Two-Component Equations for Spin-½ Particles Using Foldy-Wouthuysen-Type Transformations with an Application to the k. p. Method in Solids

S. Teitler

Published Dec 25, 1968• 0 citations

Abstract

The Foldy-Wouthuysen formalism is presented in a representation-independent manner. It is shown that an algebraic transformation serves to remove the mass term from the Dirac equation for spin-\textonehalf{} particles, thereby providing decoupled two-component equations in a particular (Weyl) representation. Also it is shown that appropriate use of a constant algebraic transformation applied to a Dirac Hamiltonian in the usual (Pauli) representation leads to a nonrelativistic k. p equation used in solid-state theory for which the k-dependent spin-orbit term is absent.

DOI: 10.1103/physrev.176.1443

Related papers

Foldy–Wouthuysen-type reduction of the second-order Dirac equation

Levere C. Hostler

Journal of Mathematical PhysicsJul 1, 19890 citations

The Reduction of the Dirac Equation to a Nonrelativistic Form

R.E. Moss

The positive and negative energy solutions of the Dirac equation for a free electron are completely decoupled using the method of small components. It is shown that this separation is formally equivalent to that obtained with the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation but that the separation is achieved much more economically with the method of small components. The method may also be used to relate operators in the relativistic and nonrelativistic representations.

American Journal of PhysicsOct 1, 19716 citations

Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformation. Exact Solution with Generalization to the Two-Particle Problem

Erik Eriksen

Physical ReviewAug 1, 1958106 citations

The Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation

Costella, J P, Bruce H. J. McKellar

The Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation of the Dirac Hamiltonian is generally taught as simply a mathematical trick that allows one to obtain a two-component theory in the low-energy limit. It is not often emphasized that the transformed representation is the only one in which one can take a meaningful *classical limit*, in terms of particles and antiparticles. We briefly review the history and physics of this transformation.

Mar 23, 199567 citations

The Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation

John P. Costella, Bruce H. J. McKellar

The Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation of the Dirac Hamiltonian is generally taught as simply a mathematical trick that allows one to obtain a two-component theory in the low-energy limit. It is not often emphasized that the transformed representation is the only one in which one can take a meaningful classical limit, in terms of particles and antiparticles. We briefly review the history and physics of this transformation.

arXiv:hep-ph/9503416American Journal of PhysicsDec 1, 1995101 citations

Correspondence between classical and Dirac-Pauli spinors in view of the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation

Tsung-Wei Chen, Dah-Wei Chiou

arXiv:1310.8513Physical Review AMar 10, 201414 citations

Physical Review

Separated Two-Component Equations for Spin-½ Particles Using Foldy-Wouthuysen-Type Transformations with an Application to the k. p. Method in Solids

S. Teitler

Published Dec 25, 1968• 0 citations

Publisher

Abstract

DOI: 10.1103/physrev.176.1443

Related papers

Foldy–Wouthuysen-type reduction of the second-order Dirac equation

Levere C. Hostler

A nonrelativistic reduction of the second-order Dirac equation is investigated. An equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 is obtained for a ‘‘kinetic Hamiltonian’’ K such that Φ obeys a nonrelativistic Schrödinger-type equation Π0Φ=KΦ in addition to obeying the second-order Dirac equation. Non-self-adjoint terms in K are removed by a change of representation from Φ to ΦT ≡PΦ, and a closed expression P≡[ 1/2 +(K† −Π̂)(K−Π̂)/2(m)2]1/2 is obtained for P. Similar results are obtained for antiparticle states, and a type of ‘‘factorization theorem’’ for the second-order Dirac equation is obtained in which the second-order Dirac equation is replaced by a pair of uncoupled first-order equations. Since nonperturbative techniques are used throughout, the factorization theorem holds independently of the question of convergence of the Foldy–Wouthuysen series and is valid whenever the equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 admits a solution for K. The connection with the usual linear Dirac equation is investigated, and closed expressions are described for a transformation to a representation of that equation which is ‘‘even’’ in the language of Foldy and Wouthuysen. The transformation described is equivalent to two consecutive ‘‘odd’’ unitary transformations.A nonrelativistic reduction of the second-order Dirac equation is investigated. An equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 is obtained for a ‘‘kinetic Hamiltonian’’ K such that Φ obeys a nonrelativistic Schrödinger-type equation Π0Φ=KΦ in addition to obeying the second-order Dirac equation. Non-self-adjoint terms in K are removed by a change of representation from Φ to ΦT ≡PΦ, and a closed expression P≡[ 1/2 +(K† −Π̂)(K−Π̂)/2(m)2]1/2 is obtained for P. Similar results are obtained for antiparticle states, and a type of ‘‘factorization theorem’’ for the second-order Dirac equation is obtained in which the second-order Dirac equation is replaced by a pair of uncoupled first-order equations. Since nonperturbative techniques are used throughout, the factorization theorem holds independently of the question of convergence of the Foldy–Wouthuysen series and is valid whenever the equation K2+[Π0; K−Π̂]=m2+Π̂2 admits a solution for K. The connection with the usual linear Dirac equation is investigated, and closed expressions are described for a transformation to a representation of that equation which is ‘‘even’’ in the language of Foldy and Wouthuysen. The transformation described is equivalent to two consecutive ‘‘odd’’ unitary transformations.

Journal of Mathematical PhysicsJul 1, 19890 citations

The Reduction of the Dirac Equation to a Nonrelativistic Form

R.E. Moss

American Journal of PhysicsOct 1, 19716 citations

Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformation. Exact Solution with Generalization to the Two-Particle Problem

Erik Eriksen

The Dirac Hamiltonian for a particle in a nonexplicitly time-dependent field is converted to an even Dirac matrix by means of a single canonical transformation. When the interaction term is an odd Dirac matrix, the transformed Hamiltonian is expressed in a very simple form. An exact transformation is also found for two-particle wave equations of Breit's type. The transformed Hamiltonian is then a $\mathrm{uU}$ -separating matrix, in Chraplyvy's sense.In the nonrelativistic limit expansions in powers of $\frac{1}{m}$ or $\frac{1}{c}$ are made. The approximate wave equations are in agreement with previous transformation results.The Dirac Hamiltonian for a particle in a nonexplicitly time-dependent field is converted to an even Dirac matrix by means of a single canonical transformation. When the interaction term is an odd Dirac matrix, the transformed Hamiltonian is expressed in a very simple form. An exact transformation is also found for two-particle wave equations of Breit's type. The transformed Hamiltonian is then a $\mathrm{uU}$-separating matrix, in Chraplyvy's sense.In the nonrelativistic limit expansions in powers of $\frac{1}{m}$ or $\frac{1}{c}$ are made. The approximate wave equations are in agreement with previous transformation results.

Physical ReviewAug 1, 1958106 citations

The Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation

Costella, J P, Bruce H. J. McKellar

Mar 23, 199567 citations

The Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation

John P. Costella, Bruce H. J. McKellar

arXiv:hep-ph/9503416American Journal of PhysicsDec 1, 1995101 citations

Correspondence between classical and Dirac-Pauli spinors in view of the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation

Tsung-Wei Chen, Dah-Wei Chiou

The classical dynamics for a charged spin particle is governed by the Lorentz force equation for orbital motion and by the Thomas-Bargmann-Michel-Telegdi (T-BMT) equation for spin precession. In static and homogeneous electromagnetic fields, it has been shown that the Foldy-Wouthuysen (FW) transform of the Dirac-Pauli Hamiltonian, which describes the relativistic quantum theory for a spin- $1/2$ particle, is consistent with the classical Hamiltonian (with both the orbital and spin parts) up to the order of $1/{m}^{14}$ ( $m$ is the particle's mass) in the low-energy and weak-field limit. In this paper, we extend this correspondence to the case of inhomogeneous fields. Regardless of the field gradient (e.g. Stern-Gerlach) force, the T-BMT equation is unaltered and thus the classical Hamiltonian remains the same, but subtleties arise and need to be clarified. For the relativistic quantum theory, we apply Eriksen's method to obtain the exact FW transformations for the two special cases, which in conjunction strongly suggest that, in the weak-field limit, the FW transformed Dirac-Pauli Hamiltonian (except for the Darwin term) is in agreement with the classical Hamiltonian in a manner that classical variables correspond to quantum operators via a specific Weyl ordering. Meanwhile, the Darwin term is shown to have no classical correspondence.The classical dynamics for a charged spin particle is governed by the Lorentz force equation for orbital motion and by the Thomas-Bargmann-Michel-Telegdi (T-BMT) equation for spin precession. In static and homogeneous electromagnetic fields, it has been shown that the Foldy-Wouthuysen (FW) transform of the Dirac-Pauli Hamiltonian, which describes the relativistic quantum theory for a spin-$1/2$ particle, is consistent with the classical Hamiltonian (with both the orbital and spin parts) up to the order of $1/{m}^{14}$ ($m$ is the particle's mass) in the low-energy and weak-field limit. In this paper, we extend this correspondence to the case of inhomogeneous fields. Regardless of the field gradient (e.g. Stern-Gerlach) force, the T-BMT equation is unaltered and thus the classical Hamiltonian remains the same, but subtleties arise and need to be clarified. For the relativistic quantum theory, we apply Eriksen's method to obtain the exact FW transformations for the two special cases, which in conjunction strongly suggest that, in the weak-field limit, the FW transformed Dirac-Pauli Hamiltonian (except for the Darwin term) is in agreement with the classical Hamiltonian in a manner that classical variables correspond to quantum operators via a specific Weyl ordering. Meanwhile, the Darwin term is shown to have no classical correspondence.

arXiv:1310.8513Physical Review AMar 10, 201414 citations

\mathrm{uU}

-separating matrix, in Chraplyvy's sense.In the nonrelativistic limit expansions in powers of

\frac{1}{m}

\frac{1}{c}

are made. The approximate wave equations are in agreement with previous transformation results.

1/2

particle, is consistent with the classical Hamiltonian (with both the orbital and spin parts) up to the order of

1/{m}^{14}

(

m

is the particle's mass) in the low-energy and weak-field limit. In this paper, we extend this correspondence to the case of inhomogeneous fields. Regardless of the field gradient (e.g. Stern-Gerlach) force, the T-BMT equation is unaltered and thus the classical Hamiltonian remains the same, but subtleties arise and need to be clarified. For the relativistic quantum theory, we apply Eriksen's method to obtain the exact FW transformations for the two special cases, which in conjunction strongly suggest that, in the weak-field limit, the FW transformed Dirac-Pauli Hamiltonian (except for the Darwin term) is in agreement with the classical Hamiltonian in a manner that classical variables correspond to quantum operators via a specific Weyl ordering. Meanwhile, the Darwin term is shown to have no classical correspondence.