In view of the fact that physical measurements represent transmission of information, a general definition based on the measure of “lack of knowledge” in information theory can be introduced for different entropies each of them corresponding to one particular kind of measurement. By means of this entropy concept the problem of the consistency of microscopic reversibility and macroscopic irreversibility is studied. Under certain conditions it can be shown that the reversible microscopic equation of motion leads to the result that all entropies corresponding to “reduced” quantities, i.e. to quantities which do not determine the microscopic state of the system completely, can never decrease. However, it is to be noted that this behaviour is symmetric in time, in the classical as well as in the quantum mechanical case. Irreversibility is so related on the one hand to incomplete description of a system, but on the other also to the fact that theoretical statements can be verified by experiments in the future only. The validity of the results obtained within the framework of ensemble theory for a single physical system is discussed. As applications of the general ideas a system of free particles and the BOLTZMANN gas are treated.
In view of the fact that physical measurements represent transmission of information, a general definition based on the measure of “lack of knowledge” in information theory can be introduced for different entropies each of them corresponding to one particular kind of measurement. By means of this entropy concept the problem of the consistency of microscopic reversibility and macroscopic irreversibility is studied. Under certain conditions it can be shown that the reversible microscopic equation of motion leads to the result that all entropies corresponding to “reduced” quantities, i.e. to quantities which do not determine the microscopic state of the system completely, can never decrease. However, it is to be noted that this behaviour is symmetric in time, in the classical as well as in the quantum mechanical case. Irreversibility is so related on the one hand to incomplete description of a system, but on the other also to the fact that theoretical statements can be verified by experiments in the future only. The validity of the results obtained within the framework of ensemble theory for a single physical system is discussed. As applications of the general ideas a system of free particles and the BOLTZMANN gas are treated.
In view of the fact that physical measurements represent transmission of information, a general definition based on the measure of lack of knowledge in information theory can be introduced for different entropies each of them corresponding to one particular kind of measurement. By means of this entropy concept the problem of the consistency of microscopic reversibility and maeroscopic irreversibility is studied. Under certain conditions it can be shown that the reversible microscopic equation of motion leads to the result that all entropies corresponding to reduced quantities, i.e., to quantities which do not determine the microscopic state of the system completely, can never decrease. However, it is to be noted that this behavior is symmetric in time, in the classical as well as in the quantum mechanical case. Irreversibility is so related on the one hand to incomplete description of a system, but on the other also to the fact that theoretical statements can be verified by experiments in the future only. The validity of the results obtained within the framework of ensemble theory for a single physical system is dtscussed. As applications of the general ideas a system of free particles and the Boltzmann gas are treated. (auth)
Concepts from information theory are used to investigate the relation between measurement and irreversibility in finite, closed classical systems having known Hamiltonians. The effects of measurement upon the predictions of the observer are found for the cases of a single measurement, two simultaneous measurements, and two measurements at different times. The physical basis of coarse graining and the significance of the increase in the coarse-grained entropy are discussed. An evolution equation is obtained describing the probability distribution of the measured quantities, and it is shown that this equation is non-Markoffian. Despite this non-Markoffian behavior, the distribution may behave irreversibly and may approach equilibrium. Thus, irreversible behavior is obtained without continual coarse graining. The condition for irreversible behavior is given for the case of a single measurement. The thermodynamic entropy is defined for general nonequilibrium situations.
What is the physical significance of entropy? What is the physical origin of irreversibility? Do entropy and irreversibility exist only for complex and macroscopic systems? The bulk of the physics community accepts and teaches that all these fundamental questions are rationalized within statistical mechanics. Indeed, for everyday laboratory physics, the mathematical formalism of statistical mechanics (canonical and grandcanonica1, Boltzmann, Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac distributions) allows a successful description of the thermodynamic equilibrium properties of matter, including entropy values. But an ever growing handful of physicists (Schrodinger among the first) have realized that, even in its explanation of the meaning of entropy, statistical mechanics is impaired by ambiguities and logical inconsistencies. They have started to search for a better theory to eliminate these stumbling blocks while maintaining the mathematical formalism that has been so successful in so many applications. This handful of upstreamers must not be confused with the many schools of physicists that have thrived on the more renowned incompleteness of statistical mechanics, namely, the lack of a quantitative (and the weakness of the qualitative) explanation of the origin of irreversibility. In these studies the thrust is provided by the discovery that the macroscopic dynamics of certain complex systems may be modeled using a few-degrees-of-freedom nonlinear Hamiltonian with singularities that give rise to bifurcations and chaotic behavior. These results have generated successful ways to describe irreversible behavior, but their link to the origin of irreversibility is still only heuristic (what is the connection between the nonlinear model Hamiltonian and the true full Hamiitonian?) and does not provide yet a rigorous resolution of the century-old paradox of the conflict between the irreversibiiity of macroscopic behavior, and the reversibility of the laws of mechanics. To resolve both the problem of the meaning of entropy and that of the origin of irreversibility we have built entropy and irreversibility into the laws of mechanics. The result is a theory that we call quantum thermodynamics that has all the necessary properties to combine mechanics and thermodynamics uniting all the successful results of both theories, eliminating the logical inconsistencies of statistical mechanics and the paradox on irreversibiiity, and providing an entirely new perspective on the microscopic origin of irreversibility, nonlinearity and therefore chaotic behavior. The mathematical formalism of quantum thermodynamics differs from that of statistical mechanics mainly in the equation of motion which is nonlinear but has solutions identical to those of the Schrodinger equation for all the states for which statistical mechanics reduces to quantum mechanics. The physical meaning of the formalism of quantum thermodynamics differs more drastically from that of statistical mechanics. The significance of the state operator of quantum thermodynamics is entirely different from that of the density operator of statistical mechanics, even though the two are mathematically equivalent. Indeed they obey different equations of motion. In particular, quantum thermodynamics is concerned only with those systems for which quantum mechanics would describe the states with vectors in Hilbert space or, equivalently, projection operators. Using a well known jargon, we can say that quantum thermodynamics like quantum mechanics is concerned only with pure quantum states. However, it postulates that the set of pure quantum states of a system is much broader than contemplated by quantum mechanics. Pure quantum states must be described by operators defined by all the features of projection operators except the condition of idempotence. As a result, an operator that within statistical mechanics would describe a mixed quantum state (that is, the average state of a statistical mixture of identical systems in different pure quantum states) in quantum thermodynamics describes a pure quantum state, a state that neither quantum mechanics non statistical mechanics would contemplate. Conceptually, the increased richness of pure quantum states is a new revolutionary postulate of quantum physics. But from the point of view of the statistical mechanics practitioners the new theory is not as traumatic as it seems. Whenever one uses a nonidempotent density operator to describe a thermodynamic equilibrium state one simply has to reinterpret it as one of the new pure quantum states. One even saves the usual ad hoc arguments on thermal baths and reservoirs that are usually required in statistical mechanics to justify the use of a nonidempotent density operator to describe the state of a system. In this paper we discuss the background and formalism of quantum thermodynamics including its nonlinear equation of motion and the main general results. Our objective is to show in a not-too-technical manner that this theory provides indeed a complete and coherent resolution of the century-old dilemma on the meaning of entropy and the origin of irreversibility. As a byproduct, we discuss a long set of criteria that a theory should meet in order to afford the same claim.
Abstract We consider the temporal evolution of an isolated system of N particles from a non-equilibrium state of entropy S = S′ to the equilibrium state of maximum entropy, S = S max, S′ ≤ S max. The application of usual density matrix theory to the temporal development of S leads us to dS/dt = 0: The entropy S does not change in time t. Thereby it is irrelevant, whether we consider a non-equilibrium state or an equilibrium state. Consequently, the system cannot irreversibly change by entropy production dS/dt > 0 from S′ to S max. This is a paradoxial result, which contradicts the experience. It can be traced back to the von Neumann equation, which in principle describes reversible processes and hence is unsuitable for calculating the irreversible evolution of the entropy S in time t. Each irreversible process is accompanied by a positive entropy production P = dS/dt ≥ 0 inside the system, which only vanishes in case of the equilibrium state. In order to overcome the above mentioned difficulties, we assign an operator P to the entropy production P, which is defined by the eigenvalue equation P |u〉 = P|u〉 with the state vector |u〉 of the N-particle system. There was an extensive discussion about the relation between the production of entropy P on one hand and the progression of time t on the other. Making use of this concept, we combine the operator of entropy production P with the time-development operator U (t, t 0) of the system and finally deduce the infinitesimal unitary operator U (t+τ,t) = 1 + (i/k)τ P by means of very general assumptions. Here P means the generator of the infinitesimal progression of time τ = t − t 0 and k the Boltzmann constant, representing the atomic entropy unit. Similarly to P we also treat the time t as an observable, defined by t |u〉 = t|u〉. We apply the infinitesimal time-evolution operator U (t+τ,t) to the operator of time t and finally obtain the P – t commutation relation i[ P , t ] = k, which is independent of τ. It shows that the operators P and t do not commute, and hence P and t are not sharply defined simultaneously. Instead we have uncertainties ΔP and Δt on measuring P and t, which are given by the P–t uncertainty relation ΔPΔt ≥ k/2. It readily allows a discussion of the evolution of the entropy S of the isolated system in time t from S′ to S max. Now, the irreversible steps are correctly described by the entropy production P = dS/dt > 0, while the thermal equilibrium is given by P = 0, ΔP = 0, and thus the lifetime of the equilibrium state Δt = ∞. According to the P–t uncertainty relation, the Boltzmann constant k is similarly important to the quantum thermodynamics of irreversible processes like Planck′s constant h to usual quantum mechanics.
Time-reversal had always been assumed to be a symmetry of physics at the fundamental level. In this paper we will explore the violations of time-reversal symmetry at the fundamental level and the consequence on thermodynamic systems. First, we will argue from current physics that the universe dynamics is not time-reversal invariant. Second, we will argue that any thermodynamic system cannot be isolated completely from the universe. We then discuss how these two make the dynamics of thermodynamics systems very weakly irreversible at the classical and quantum level. Since time-reversal is no longer a symmetry of realistic systems, the problem of how macroscopic irreversibility arises from microscopic reversibility becomes irrelevant because there is no longer microscopic reversibility. At the classical level of a thermodynamic system, we show that the H theorem of Boltzmann is still valid even without microscopic reversibility. We do this by deriving a modified H theorem, which still shows entropy monotonically increasing. At the quantum level, we explicitly show the effect of CP violation, small irreversible changes on the internal states of the nuclear and atomic energy levels of thermodynamic systems. Thus, we remove Loschmidt's objection to Boltzmann's ideas.
We had previously shown [T. Yarman et al., Results Phys. 10 (2018) 818–821] that the classical adiabatic relation pV 5/3=Constant for an ideal monatomic gas admits a direct quantum-mechanical formulation in terms of Planck’s constant and confinement-dependent quantum-state indices. This result suggests that macroscopic thermodynamic scaling laws reflect an underlying quantum-state structure. In the present work, we revisit this quantum-state scaling framework and discuss how it may provide a complementary language for thermodynamic accessibility and macroscopic irreversibility. In particular, we emphasize the conceptual distinction between microscopic reversibility, the arrow of time, and operational macroscopic irreversibility. Within this perspective, irreversibility may be interpreted in terms of asymmetries in accessible quantum-state configurations under changing confinement and energy conditions, while the underlying microscopic equations remain formally time-reversal symmetric. At the same time, the concept of operationally inaccessible microscopic quantum reconstruction, such as that with regards to fission, naturally emerges. Still, we do not claim to replace Boltzmannian, correlation-based, or information-theoretic approaches. Rather, the present study proposes a complementary quantum-state scaling perspective for discussing thermodynamic accessibility and the macroscopic evolution of complex systems. Even so, within the present framework, these practical limitations on thermodynamic accessibility do not necessitate a breakdown of formal microscopic reversibility; rather, they align with the Boltzmannian view that macroscopic reversals remain formally possible yet are rendered overwhelmingly inaccessible in practice.