The tunneling-time problem is shown to be analogous to the interpretation of the two-slit interference experiment. A measurement assuming an arbitrarily small interaction between a particle and a clock is shown to contradict the uncertainty principle and leads to complex times. A real non-negative traversal time is obtained in a measurement which selects Feynman paths that spend in the barrier a known amount of time; this, however, strongly perturbs the tunneling. The Larmor clock demonstrates both types of behavior.
The tunneling-time problem is shown to be analogous to the interpretation of the two-slit interference experiment. A measurement assuming an arbitrarily small interaction between a particle and a clock is shown to contradict the uncertainty principle and leads to complex times. A real non-negative traversal time is obtained in a measurement which selects Feynman paths that spend in the barrier a known amount of time; this, however, strongly perturbs the tunneling. The Larmor clock demonstrates both types of behavior.
A controversy surrounding the "tunnelling time problem" stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an "operational" angle. Typically, one tries to mimic, in a quantum case, an experiment which yields the desired result for a classical particle. One such approach is based on the use of a Larmor clock. We show that the difficulty with applying a non-perturbing Larmor clock in order to "time" a classically forbidden transition arises from the quantum Uncertainty Principle. We also demonstrate that for this reason a Larmor time (in fact, any Larmor time) cannot be interpreted as a physical time interval. We provide a theoretical description of the quantities measured by the clock.
We derive the exact distribution of times spent in the classically forbidden region by a particle as it tunnels through a square barrier potential. We find that the integrated distribution has a simple interpretation. If one restricts the time spent in the barrier to be \ensuremath{\leqslant}\ensuremath{\tau}, then an effective uncertainty \ensuremath{\Delta}V is introduced in the barrier height, such that\ensuremath{\Delta}V\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremath{\simeq}1. This uncertainty leads to unusual interference effects in the distribution. These interference effects explain why the average speed of a particle traversing a very opaque barrier may exceed the speed of light. \textcopyright{} 1990 The American Physical Society
The Salecker-Wigner-Peres (SWP) clock is often used to determine the duration a quantum particle is supposed to spend in a specified region of space $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$. By construction, the result is a real positive number, and the method seems to avoid the difficulty of introducing complex time parameters, which arises in the Feynman paths approach. However, it tells little about the particle's motion. We investigate this matter further, and show that the SWP clock, like any other Larmor clock, correlates the rotation of its angular momentum with the durations $\ensuremath{\tau}$, which the Feynman paths spend in $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}$, thereby destroying interference between different durations. An inaccurate weakly coupled clock leaves the interference almost intact, and the need to resolve the resulting ``which way?'' problem is one of the main difficulties at the center of the ``tunnelling time'' controversy. In the absence of a probability distribution for the values of $\ensuremath{\tau}$, the SWP results are expressed in terms of moduli of the ``complex times,'' given by the weighted sums of the corresponding probability amplitudes. It is shown that overinterpretation of these results, by treating the SWP times as physical time intervals, leads to paradoxes and should be avoided. We also analyze various settings of the SWP clock, different calibration procedures, and the relation between the SWP results and the quantum dwell time. The cases of stationary tunneling and tunnel ionization are considered in some detail. Although our detailed analysis addresses only one particular definition of the duration of a tunneling process, it also points towards the impossibility of uniting various time parameters, which may occur in quantum theory, within the concept of a single tunnelling time.
Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.
The time a quantum particle spends traversing a classically forbidden region has resisted un-ambiguous definition since the earliest analyses of wave-packet tunneling, and the proliferation ofmutually incompatible “clocks”—the Wigner phase time, the Büttiker–Landauer traversal time, theLarmor time, and the path-integral complex time among them—has kept the question open fordecades. The controversy has been sharpened, not settled, by the advent of attosecond angular-streaking metrology, in which competing analyses of tunnel ionization continue to disagree over theexistence of a finite delay. Here we show that these rival definitions are not alternative answersto a single question but distinct cumulants of one traversal-time quasi-distribution, generated bythe exact rectangular-barrier transmission amplitude when the latter is promoted to a cumulantgenerating functional through a barrier-height counting field. The first cumulant unifies the Wignerphase time and the Larmor/Büttiker–Landauer time as the real and imaginary parts of a singlecomplex traversal time, recovering the celebrated Hartman saturation as the width-independentvalue ℏ/V0 of its real part. The second cumulant—which, to our knowledge, has not previouslybeen enlisted as a tunneling-time observable—yields a traversal-time variance that entirely evadesthe Hartman saturation and instead grows linearly with the barrier width d. The standard devia-tion of the tunneling time therefore scales as στ ∝ √d: rather than becoming superluminally sharpfor thick barriers, the tunneling time grows progressively more uncertain, in direct opposition tothe naive superluminal reading of the Hartman effect. This parameter-free scaling, independentof the O(1) coefficient that fixes its magnitude, constitutes a falsifiable prediction: attosecond an-gular streaking, which resolves the full arrival-time distribution of tunneled electrons rather thanmerely its centroid, should register a temporal spread broadening as √d even where the mean delaysaturates. We thereby recast a nearly century-old semantic dispute as a concrete experimentalquestion.
Quantum particles interacting with potential barriers are ubiquitous in physics, and the question of how much time they spend inside classically forbidden regions has attracted interest for many decades. Recent developments of new experimental techniques revived the issue and ignited a debate with often contradictory results. This motivates the present study of an exactly solvable model for quantum tunneling induced by a strong field. We show that the tunneling dynamics can depart significantly from the scenario in which the barrier-traversal time is zero or very small. However, our findings do not support the idea of a well-defined tunneling time either. Our numerically exact results should help in finding a consensus about this fundamental problem.