Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Modern Physics Letters A

UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE, SQUEEZING, AND QUANTUM GROUPS

A. K. Rajagopal, V.K. Gupta

Published Dec 28, 1992• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It is shown that the complete form of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation (HUR) must be employed in introducing the concepts of squeezing and coherent state in q-quantum mechanics. An important feature of this form of the HUR is that it is invariant under unitary transformation of the operators appearing in it and consequences of this are pointed out.

DOI
10.1142/s0217732392003177

Related papers

Quantum Entanglement and Generalised Uncertainty Relations

Harris Varghese, M. Ravendranadhan

The Robertson's formulation of the uncertainty relation is the most widely accepted form of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (HUR). It gets modified when we consider it for entangled particles. But this formulation does not consider the measurement process itself. There are reformulation of the uncertainty relations called the generalized uncertainty relations by including the measurement process into the uncertainty relation. HUR gets modified for the case of entangled particles. Here it is shown that the limit of the Generalized Uncertainty Relation (GUR) also reduces for entangled particles. So, GUR also shows similar trend as that of the HUR for entangled particles. Also as entanglement increases, the uncertainty reduces and measurement becomes more precise.

arXiv:1706.09377•Jun 28, 2017•0 citations

THE DEPENDENCY ON THE SQUEEZING PARAMETER FOR THE UNCERTAINTY RELATION IN THE SQUEEZED STATES OF THE TIME-DEPENDENT OSCILLATOR

Jeong Ryeol Choi

We obtained the uncertainty relation in squeezed states for a time-dependent oscillator. The uncertainty relation in coherent states is same as that of the number states with n=0. However, the uncertainty relation in squeezed states does not satisfy this property and depends on squeezing parameter c. For instance, the uncertainty relation is ℏ/2 which is the minimum value as far as quantum mechanics permits for c=1, same as that in coherent state for c=±∞, and infinity for c=-1. If the time-dependency of the Hamiltonian for the system vanishes, the uncertainty relation in squeezed states will no longer depend on c and becomes the same as that in number state with n=0, like the uncertainty relation in coherent states.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jun 30, 2004•6 citations

q-PHASE-COHERENT STATES AND THEIR SQUEEZING PROPERTIES

Lin Zhixin, YANG YA-PING, FENG WEI-GUO +1 more

Squeezing properties of q-phase-coherent states with respect to the phase quadrature operators are studied.The relations between number-phase squeezing and number-phase uncertainty are also studied in detail for a two-state system.Some new number-phase minimum uncertainty states are found.

Acta Physica Sinica•Jan 1, 1998•2 citations

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is usually taken to express a limitation of operational possibilities imposed by quantum mechanics.Here we demonstrate that the full content of this principle also includes its positive role as a condition ensuring that mutually exclusive experimental options can be reconciled if an appropriate trade-off is accepted.The uncertainty principle is shown to appear in three manifestations, in the form of uncertainty relations: for the widths of the position and momentum distributions in any quantum state; for the inaccuracies of any joint measurement of these quantities; and for the inaccuracy of a measurement of one of the quantities and the ensuing disturbance in the distribution of the other quantity.Whilst conceptually distinct, these three kinds of uncertainty relations are shown to be closely related formally.Finally, we survey models and experimental implementations of joint measurements of position and momentum and comment briefly on the status of experimental tests of the uncertainty principle.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 1, 2000•0 citations

Realistic Approach of the Relations of Uncertainty of Heisenberg

Paul E. Sterian

Due to the requirements of the principle of causality in the theory of relativity, one cannot make a device for the simultaneous measuring of the canonical conjugate variables in the conjugate Fourier spaces. Instead of admitting that a particle’s position and its conjugate momentum cannot be accurately measured at the same time, we consider the only probabilities which can be determined when working at subatomic level to be valid. On the other hand, based on Schwinger's action principle and using the quadridimensional form of the unitary transformation generator function of the quantum operators in the paper, the general form of the evolution equation for these operators is established. In the nonrelativistic case one obtains the Heisenberg's type evolution equations which can be particularized to derive Heisenberg's uncertainty relations. The analysis of the uncertainty relations as implicit evolution equations allows us to put into evidence the intrinsic nature of the correlation expressed by these equations in straight relations with the measuring process. The independence of the quantisation postulate from the causal evolution postulate of quantum mechanics is also put into discussion.

Advances in High Energy Physics•Jan 1, 2013•3 citations

Canonical transformation in quantum mechanics

Y. S. Kim, Eugene Paul Wigner

The phase-space picture of quantum mechanics and some examples illustrating it are presented. Since the position and momentum are c numbers in this picture, it is possible to introduce the concept of phase space in quantum mechanics. The uncertainty relation is stated in terms of an area element in phase space, whose minimum size is Planck’s constant. Area-preserving canonical transformations in phase space are therefore uncertainty-preserving transformations. The wave-packet spread, coherent-state representation, and squeezed states of light are discussed as illustrative examples.

American Journal of Physics•May 1, 1990•45 citations
It is shown that the complete form of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation (HUR) must be employed in introducing the concepts of squeezing and coherent state in q-quantum mechanics. An important feature of this form of the HUR is that it is invariant under unitary transformation of the operators appearing in it and consequences of this are pointed out.
The Robertson's formulation of the uncertainty relation is the most widely accepted form of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation (HUR). It gets modified when we consider it for entangled particles. But this formulation does not consider the measurement process itself. There are reformulation of the uncertainty relations called the generalized uncertainty relations by including the measurement process into the uncertainty relation. HUR gets modified for the case of entangled particles. Here it is shown that the limit of the Generalized Uncertainty Relation (GUR) also reduces for entangled particles. So, GUR also shows similar trend as that of the HUR for entangled particles. Also as entanglement increases, the uncertainty reduces and measurement becomes more precise.
We obtained the uncertainty relation in squeezed states for a time-dependent oscillator. The uncertainty relation in coherent states is same as that of the number states with n=0. However, the uncertainty relation in squeezed states does not satisfy this property and depends on squeezing parameter c. For instance, the uncertainty relation is ℏ/2 which is the minimum value as far as quantum mechanics permits for c=1, same as that in coherent state for c=±∞, and infinity for c=-1. If the time-dependency of the Hamiltonian for the system vanishes, the uncertainty relation in squeezed states will no longer depend on c and becomes the same as that in number state with n=0, like the uncertainty relation in coherent states.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is usually taken to express a limitation of operational possibilities imposed by quantum mechanics.Here we demonstrate that the full content of this principle also includes its positive role as a condition ensuring that mutually exclusive experimental options can be reconciled if an appropriate trade-off is accepted.The uncertainty principle is shown to appear in three manifestations, in the form of uncertainty relations: for the widths of the position and momentum distributions in any quantum state; for the inaccuracies of any joint measurement of these quantities; and for the inaccuracy of a measurement of one of the quantities and the ensuing disturbance in the distribution of the other quantity.Whilst conceptually distinct, these three kinds of uncertainty relations are shown to be closely related formally.Finally, we survey models and experimental implementations of joint measurements of position and momentum and comment briefly on the status of experimental tests of the uncertainty principle.
Due to the requirements of the principle of causality in the theory of relativity, one cannot make a device for the simultaneous measuring of the canonical conjugate variables in the conjugate Fourier spaces. Instead of admitting that a particle’s position and its conjugate momentum cannot be accurately measured at the same time, we consider the only probabilities which can be determined when working at subatomic level to be valid. On the other hand, based on Schwinger's action principle and using the quadridimensional form of the unitary transformation generator function of the quantum operators in the paper, the general form of the evolution equation for these operators is established. In the nonrelativistic case one obtains the Heisenberg's type evolution equations which can be particularized to derive Heisenberg's uncertainty relations. The analysis of the uncertainty relations as implicit evolution equations allows us to put into evidence the intrinsic nature of the correlation expressed by these equations in straight relations with the measuring process. The independence of the quantisation postulate from the causal evolution postulate of quantum mechanics is also put into discussion.
The phase-space picture of quantum mechanics and some examples illustrating it are presented. Since the position and momentum are c numbers in this picture, it is possible to introduce the concept of phase space in quantum mechanics. The uncertainty relation is stated in terms of an area element in phase space, whose minimum size is Planck’s constant. Area-preserving canonical transformations in phase space are therefore uncertainty-preserving transformations. The wave-packet spread, coherent-state representation, and squeezed states of light are discussed as illustrative examples.