Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Comment on “Time asymmetry in quantum mechanics: a retrodiction paradox”

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

Published Jul 1, 1995• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(95)00396-k

Related papers

Time asymmetry in quantum mechanics: a retrodiction paradox

Asher Peres

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 1994•15 citations

Reply to the comment of Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman on “Time asymmetry in quantum mechanics: a retrodiction paradox”

Asher Peres

arXiv:quant-ph/9501005•Physics Letters A•Jul 1, 1995•6 citations

Incompatible and contradictory retrodictions in the history approach to quantum mechanics

Giulio Peruzzi, A. Rimini

arXiv:quant-ph/9710003•Foundations of Physics Letters•Jan 1, 1998•2 citations

Time asymmetry and the interpretation of quantum theory.

Viatcheslav Mukhanov

•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

A retrodiction paradox in quantum and classical optics

Andrea Aiello, J. P. Woerdman

Quantum mechanics represents one of the greatest triumphs of human intellect and, undoubtedly, is the most successful physical theory we have to date. However, since its foundation about a century ago, it has been uninterruptedly the center of harsh debates ignited by the counterintuitive character of some of its predictions. The subject of one of these heated discussions is the so-called "retrodiction paradox", namely a deceptive inconsistency of quantum mechanics which is often associated with the "measurement paradox" and the "collapse of the wave function"; it comes from the apparent time-asymmetry between state preparation and measurement. Actually, in the literature one finds several versions of the retrodiction paradox; however, a particularly insightful one was presented by Sir Roger Penrose in his seminal book \emph{The Road to Reality}. Here, we address the question to what degree Penrose's retrodiction paradox occurs in the classical and quantum domain. We achieve a twofold result. First, we show that Penrose's paradox manifests itself in some form also in classical optics. Second, we demonstrate that when information is correctly extracted from the measurements and the quantum-mechanical formalism is properly applied, Penrose's retrodiction paradox does not manifest itself in quantum optics.

arXiv:1506.04831•Jun 16, 2015•0 citations

Time in Quantum Mechanics II

Juan Gonzalo Muga, A. Ruschhaupt, A Del Campo

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2009•107 citations
Quantum mechanics represents one of the greatest triumphs of human intellect and, undoubtedly, is the most successful physical theory we have to date. However, since its foundation about a century ago, it has been uninterruptedly the center of harsh debates ignited by the counterintuitive character of some of its predictions. The subject of one of these heated discussions is the so-called "retrodiction paradox", namely a deceptive inconsistency of quantum mechanics which is often associated with the "measurement paradox" and the "collapse of the wave function"; it comes from the apparent time-asymmetry between state preparation and measurement. Actually, in the literature one finds several versions of the retrodiction paradox; however, a particularly insightful one was presented by Sir Roger Penrose in his seminal book \emph{The Road to Reality}. Here, we address the question to what degree Penrose's retrodiction paradox occurs in the classical and quantum domain. We achieve a twofold result. First, we show that Penrose's paradox manifests itself in some form also in classical optics. Second, we demonstrate that when information is correctly extracted from the measurements and the quantum-mechanical formalism is properly applied, Penrose's retrodiction paradox does not manifest itself in quantum optics.