The problem of reconciling the irreversibility of thermodynamics with the completely reversible mechanics of the ultimate constituents of the thermodynamical system is examined from an operational viewpoint. The informational nature of entropy is demonstrated, and the famous paradoxes of statistical mechanics, due to Loschmidt and Zermelo, are resolved with its aid. Spin echo experiments are shown to realize the conditions of Loschmidt's reflection paradox, and used to illustrate how reversibility occurs only with perfect “memory” or information storage, while “forgetting” or loss of information implies irreversibility.
The problem of reconciling the irreversibility of thermodynamics with the completely reversible mechanics of the ultimate constituents of the thermodynamical system is examined from an operational viewpoint. The informational nature of entropy is demonstrated, and the famous paradoxes of statistical mechanics, due to Loschmidt and Zermelo, are resolved with its aid. Spin echo experiments are shown to realize the conditions of Loschmidt's reflection paradox, and used to illustrate how reversibility occurs only with perfect “memory” or information storage, while “forgetting” or loss of information implies irreversibility.
Abstract If a magnetic polarization excess is locally injected in a crystal of interacting spins in thermal equilibrium, this ‘excitation’ would spread as consequence of spin–spin interactions. Such an apparently irreversible process is known as spin diffusion and it can lead the system back to ‘equilibrium’. Even so, a unitary quantum dynamics would ensure a precise memory of the non-equilibrium initial condition. Then, if at a certain time, say t / 2 , an experimental protocol reverses the many-body dynamics by changing the sign of the effective Hamiltonian, it would drive the system back to the initial non-equilibrium state at time t . As a matter of fact, the reversal is always perturbed by small experimental imperfections and/or uncontrolled internal or environmental degrees of freedom. This limits the amount of signal M ( t ) recovered locally at time t . The degradation of M ( t ) accounts for these perturbations, which can also be seen as the sources of decoherence. This general idea defines the Loschmidt echo (LE), which embodies the various time-reversal procedures implemented in nuclear magnetic resonance. Here, we present an invitation to the study of the LE following the pathway induced by the experiments. With such a purpose, we provide a historical and conceptual overview that briefly revisits selected phenomena that underlie the LE dynamics including chaos, decoherence, localization and equilibration. This guiding thread ultimately leads us to the discussion of decoherence and irreversibility as an emergent phenomenon. In addition, we introduce the LE formalism by means of spin–spin correlation functions in a manner suitable for presentation in a broad scope physics journal. Last, but not least, we present new results that could trigger new experiments and theoretical ideas. In particular, we propose to transform an initially localized excitation into a more complex initial state, enabling a dynamically prepared LE. This induces a global definition of the LE in terms of the raw overlap between many-body wave functions. Our results show that as the complexity of the prepared state increases, it becomes more fragile towards small perturbations.
If a magnetic polarization excess is locally injected in a crystal of interacting spins in thermal equilibrium, this 'excitation' would spread as consequence of spin-spin interactions. Such an apparently irreversible process is known as spin diffusion and it can lead the system back to 'equilibrium'. Even so, a unitary quantum dynamics would ensure a precise memory of the non-equilibrium initial condition. Then, if at a certain time, say , an experimental protocol reverses the many-body dynamics by changing the sign of the effective Hamiltonian, it would drive the system back to the initial non-equilibrium state at time t. As a matter of fact, the reversal is always perturbed by small experimental imperfections and/or uncontrolled internal or environmental degrees of freedom. This limits the amount of signal M(t) recovered locally at time t. The degradation of M(t) accounts for these perturbations, which can also be seen as the sources of decoherence. This general idea defines the Loschmidt echo (LE), which embodies the various time-reversal procedures implemented in nuclear magnetic resonance. Here, we present an invitation to the study of the LE following the pathway induced by the experiments. With such a purpose, we provide a historical and conceptual overview that briefly revisits selected phenomena that underlie the LE dynamics including chaos, decoherence, localization and equilibration. This guiding thread ultimately leads us to the discussion of decoherence and irreversibility as an emergent phenomenon. In addition, we introduce the LE formalism by means of spin-spin correlation functions in a manner suitable for presentation in a broad scope physics journal. Last, but not least, we present new results that could trigger new experiments and theoretical ideas. In particular, we propose to transform an initially localized excitation into a more complex initial state, enabling a dynamically prepared LE. This induces a global definition of the LE in terms of the raw overlap between many-body wave functions. Our results show that as the complexity of the prepared state increases, it becomes more fragile towards small perturbations.
Loschmidt's paradox asks why macroscopic irreversibility is universal despite the time-reversal symmetry of microscopic dynamics. We argue that irreversibility is not a property of the dynamics but of accessibility: chaotic evolution drives phase-space structure below the quantum resolution scale ℓℏ, at a critical time tc=λ−1ln(δ0/ℓℏ), after which the time-reversed microstate exists as a valid solution of Hamilton's equations but cannot be selected by any physically admissible operation. The mechanism operates entirely within the semiclassical regime tc≤tE, where classical geometry is exact. This provides a dynamical resolution of the Loschmidt paradox.
The quantum foundation is established using a Krylov-complexity framework: we prove that for any H(t)=H(−t), the quantum Lyapunov exponent satisfies λLforward=λLbackward. The arrow of time is not in the dynamics. The mechanism predicts sigmoid fidelity decay, logarithmic scaling of tc with λ−1, and ensemble-size independence of the inaccessibility threshold -- all consistent with three decades of Loschmidt echo experiments and confirmed in a stadium-billiard simulation reported here. Underlying everything: quantum mechanics conserves information exactly. Entropy, defined as the logarithm of the multiplicity Ω -- the number of possibilities consistent with the available information -- can only increase when information becomes operationally inaccessible. The second law reflects not a breakdown of microscopic reversibility, but the dynamical inaccessibility of the information required to reverse it.
We study the possibility to undo the quantum mechanical evolution in a time reversal experiment. The naive expectation, as reflected in the common terminology ("Loschmidt echo"), is that maximum compensation results if the reversed dynamics extends to the same time as the forward evolution. We challenge this belief and demonstrate that the time t(r) for maximum return probability is in general shorter. We find that t(r) depends on lambda=epsilon(evol)/epsilon(prep), being the ratio of the error in setting the parameters (fields) for the time-reversed evolution to the perturbation which is involved in the preparation process. Our results should be observable in spin-echo experiments where the dynamical irreversibility of quantum phases is measured.
Isolated systems of many particles often appear to behave irreversibly.though they are in principle dynamically reversible.In some cases this reversibility can be made evident in 'echo • phenomena.in which the system is literally restored to a dynamical statc which existed in the past.Whether such echoes are in principle possible for all isolated systems is not known.However.they do not require the absence of interactions among the particles.Thus the inhomogeneaus and 'magic sandwich' echoes are aspects of the same phcnomenon.
I. Prigogine has proposed, and the writings of N. S. Krylov to some extent suggest, a novel and unorthodox solution to foundational problems in statistical mechanics. In particular, the view claims to offer new insight into two interconnected problems: underst and ing the role of probability in physics, and that of reconciling the irreversibility of physical processes with the temporal symmetry (time reversal invariance) of dynamical theories. The approach in question advocates a conception of the state of a system which incorporates features of the quantum mechanical state concept in a context, classical statistical mechanics, where quantum considerations are generally considered to be irrelevant. I examine the plausibility of this new approach by offering an analysis of the various notions of state employed in modern physics. In the first chapter, I analyze the conceptual connections between dynamical laws and the nature of a system's state. I argue that laws and states are correlative. In constructing dynamical theories one does not start with a fixed or pre-determined state concept. Neither is one given the laws of the theory from which the conception of state is derived. Rather, we get the law/state structure as a "package." In light of this general analysis, I next examine the notion of state employed in the quantum theory. Here I consider a variety of conceptions of quantum states and assess their ability to answer the "paradoxes" of quantum theory. I pay particular attention to the role of probability and related restrictions on the realization of certain states. The new approach to statistical mechanics proposes to exploit similar restrictions on states in order to resolve the irreversibility problem. But is this unorthodox approach viable? In the final four chapters, I offer a detailed critique of this approach, examining the plausibility of the radical reworking of the state concept. I argue that while some important progress can be made, certain old puzzles remain, and new and difficult ones arise--ones which raise serious doubts about the ultimate success of this particular approach. I conclude, however, by arguing that such radical proposals are not unmotivated; and that novel and unorthodox proposals concerning the foundations of statistical mechanics must be taken seriously.