Physical Review A

Comment on "Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect" (1 page)

Sascha Wallentowitz

Published Jan 1, 2005• 1 citation

Related papers

Comment on: “Defense of ‘Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect’ ” [Phys. Lett. A 356 (2006) 411]

Sascha Wallentowitz, P. E. Toschek

Physics Letters AMar 21, 20073 citations

Defense of “Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect”

Masanao Ozawa

arXiv:quant-ph/0603030Physics Letters AApr 18, 20064 citations

Quantum Zeno effect by indirect measurement: The effect of the detector (4 pages)

P. Lambropoulos, M. G. Makris

Physical Review AJan 1, 20041 citation

Quantum Zeno effect in spontaneous decay with distant detector

Alexander D Panov

arXiv:quant-ph/0101031Physics Letters AMar 1, 20015 citations

Comment on “On the quantum Zeno effect” by Nakazato et al.

Jian-Wei Pan, Yong-de Zhang, Qinxi Dong

Physics Letters AFeb 1, 19986 citations

Comment on “Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect”

Sascha Wallentowitz, P. E. Toschek

In the paper by M. Hotta and M. Morikawa [Phys. Rev. A 69, 052114 (2004)] the non-existence of the quantum Zeno effect caused by indirect measurements has been claimed. It is shown here that the pertinent proof is incorrect, and the claim unfounded.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509098Physical Review AOct 5, 200510 citations