Physics Letters A

Comment on: “Defense of ‘Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect’ ” [Phys. Lett. A 356 (2006) 411]

Sascha Wallentowitz, P. E. Toschek

Published Mar 21, 2007• 3 citations

Publisher

DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.03.019

Related papers

Comment on "Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect" (1 page)

Sascha Wallentowitz

Physical Review AJan 1, 20051 citation

Defense of “Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect”

Masanao Ozawa

arXiv:quant-ph/0603030Physics Letters AApr 18, 20064 citations

Comment on: “Complete resolution of the quantum Zeno paradox for outside observers” [Phys. Lett. A 326 (2004) 32]

Sascha Wallentowitz, P. E. Toschek

Physics Letters AMar 15, 20061 citation

Quantum Zeno effect by indirect measurement: The effect of the detector (4 pages)

P. Lambropoulos, M. G. Makris

Physical Review AJan 1, 20041 citation

Comment on “Impossibility of distant indirect measurement of the quantum Zeno effect”

Sascha Wallentowitz, P. E. Toschek

In the paper by M. Hotta and M. Morikawa [Phys. Rev. A 69, 052114 (2004)] the non-existence of the quantum Zeno effect caused by indirect measurements has been claimed. It is shown here that the pertinent proof is incorrect, and the claim unfounded.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509098Physical Review AOct 5, 200510 citations

Comment on “On the quantum Zeno effect” by Nakazato et al.

Jian-Wei Pan, Yong-de Zhang, Qinxi Dong

Physics Letters AFeb 1, 19986 citations