Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Computer Physics Communications

The complexity of the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm

A. P. Young, Sergey Knysh, Vadim Smelyanskiy

Published Jun 9, 2010• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.cpc.2010.06.001

Related papers

Progress in the quantum Adiabatic algorithm

Edward Farhi

APS•Mar 1, 2015•1 citation

Complexity of the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm

Itay Hen

The Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm (QAA) has been proposed as a mechanism for efficiently solving optimization problems on a quantum computer. Since adiabatic computation is analog in nature and does not require the design and use of quantum gates, it can be thought of as a simpler and perhaps more profound method for performing quantum computations that might also be easier to implement experimentally. While these features have generated substantial research in QAA, to date there is still a lack of solid evidence that the algorithm can outperform classical optimization algorithms.

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 18, 2013•0 citations

Speedup in adiabatic evolution based quantum algorithms

Jie Sun, Songfeng Lu, Fang Liu

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Jul 19, 2012•21 citations

Exact Equivalence between Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm and Quantum Circuit Algorithm

Hongye Yu, Yuliang Huang, Biao Wu

We present a rigorous proof that quantum circuit algorithm can be transformed into quantum adiabatic algorithm with the exact same time complexity. This means that from a quantum circuit algorithm of L gates we can construct a quantum adiabatic algorithm with time complexity of O(L). Additionally, our construction shows that one may exponentially speed up some quantum adiabatic algorithms by properly choosing an evolution path .

arXiv:1706.07646•Chinese Physics Letters•Oct 1, 2018•21 citations

Adiabatic Quantum Computation

Catherine C. McGeoch

Synthesis lectures on quantum computing•Jan 1, 2014•7 citations

Exponential complexity of the quantum adiabatic algorithm for certain satisfiability problems

Itay Hen, A. P. Young

We determine the complexity of several constraint satisfaction problems using the quantum adiabatic algorithm in its simplest implementation. We do so by studying the size dependence of the gap to the first excited state of "typical" instances. We find that, at large sizes N, the complexity increases exponentially for all models that we study. We also compare our results against the complexity of the analogous classical algorithm WalkSAT and show that the harder the problem is for the classical algorithm, the harder it is also for the quantum adiabatic algorithm.

arXiv:1109.6872•Physical Review E•Dec 29, 2011•89 citations
The Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm (QAA) has been proposed as a mechanism for efficiently solving optimization problems on a quantum computer. Since adiabatic computation is analog in nature and does not require the design and use of quantum gates, it can be thought of as a simpler and perhaps more profound method for performing quantum computations that might also be easier to implement experimentally. While these features have generated substantial research in QAA, to date there is still a lack of solid evidence that the algorithm can outperform classical optimization algorithms.
We determine the complexity of several constraint satisfaction problems using the quantum adiabatic algorithm in its simplest implementation. We do so by studying the size dependence of the gap to the first excited state of "typical" instances. We find that, at large sizes N, the complexity increases exponentially for all models that we study. We also compare our results against the complexity of the analogous classical algorithm WalkSAT and show that the harder the problem is for the classical algorithm, the harder it is also for the quantum adiabatic algorithm.