Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy

Speedup in adiabatic evolution based quantum algorithms

Jie Sun, Songfeng Lu, Fang Liu

Published Jul 19, 2012• 21 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11433-012-4854-y

Related papers

Progress in the quantum Adiabatic algorithm

Edward Farhi

APS•Mar 1, 2015•1 citation

Speedup in Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm

Joonwoo Bae, Younghun Kwon

The quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving NPcomplete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one in the evolution. In this paper we show a way of speedup in the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm, using an extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides a new point of view to reduce the running time.

arXiv:quant-ph/0205048•Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Apr 1, 2003•0 citations

Speedup in Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm

Joonwoo Bae, Younghun Kwon

Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving instances of NP-complete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one through the evolution. In this letter, we show a way of speedup in quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm,using the extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides the new point of view to reduce the running time. It is generally expected that quantum computation may solve the problems which are hard in classical context. Shor’s quantum factorization algorithm[1] and Grover’s quantum search algorithm[2] are the preludes to such expectation. Factorization problem, which is to factorize a large number, needs exponential time resource when a known classical algorithm is applied. However, Shor’s algorithm solves the problem with exponential speedup. Grover algorithm finds a target with quadratic speedup, compared to any known classical search algorithms. Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm was proposed by Farhi et al. and applied to solve instances of NPcomplete

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

High-Performance Algorithms for Quantum Systems Evolution

А. В. Богданов, Ashot S. Gevorkyan, Elena N. Stankova

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Quantum Computation and Adiabatic Evolution

Stefano Olivares

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Invalid quantum partial adiabatic search can be remedied

Jie Sun, Hui Zheng, Zhiming Zhang +1 more

This paper first demonstrates that by appropriately specifying the evolution interval in quantum partial adiabatic evolution, the time complexity of the resulting quantum search algorithm can achieve the well-known quadratic speedup bound of quantum computation. Then this result is used as a reference to remedy invalid quantum partial adiabatic search schemes, which means its time complexity doesn’t align with the optimal quantum speedup. And, it is found that the two versions of quantum partial adiabatic evolutions, i.e. “global” and “local” ones must be treated separately, despite previous studies indicating only minor differences in algorithmic performance between the two cases. Additionally, for the “local” variant of the quantum partial adiabatic search algorithm, it can be seen that there are other possible choices for the evolution interval besides the referred one. Our findings further show that significant variations in the resulting single-round success probabilities occur between valid and invalid quantum partial adiabatic evolutions.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Jan 14, 2026•1 citation
The quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving NPcomplete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one in the evolution. In this paper we show a way of speedup in the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm, using an extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides a new point of view to reduce the running time.
Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving instances of NP-complete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one through the evolution. In this letter, we show a way of speedup in quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm,using the extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides the new point of view to reduce the running time. It is generally expected that quantum computation may solve the problems which are hard in classical context. Shor’s quantum factorization algorithm[1] and Grover’s quantum search algorithm[2] are the preludes to such expectation. Factorization problem, which is to factorize a large number, needs exponential time resource when a known classical algorithm is applied. However, Shor’s algorithm solves the problem with exponential speedup. Grover algorithm finds a target with quadratic speedup, compared to any known classical search algorithms. Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm was proposed by Farhi et al. and applied to solve instances of NPcomplete
This paper first demonstrates that by appropriately specifying the evolution interval in quantum partial adiabatic evolution, the time complexity of the resulting quantum search algorithm can achieve the well-known quadratic speedup bound of quantum computation. Then this result is used as a reference to remedy invalid quantum partial adiabatic search schemes, which means its time complexity doesn’t align with the optimal quantum speedup. And, it is found that the two versions of quantum partial adiabatic evolutions, i.e. “global” and “local” ones must be treated separately, despite previous studies indicating only minor differences in algorithmic performance between the two cases. Additionally, for the “local” variant of the quantum partial adiabatic search algorithm, it can be seen that there are other possible choices for the evolution interval besides the referred one. Our findings further show that significant variations in the resulting single-round success probabilities occur between valid and invalid quantum partial adiabatic evolutions.