Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

The exact transition probabilities of quantum-mechanical oscillators calculated by the phase-space method

M. S. Bartlett, J. E. Moyal

Published Oct 1, 1949• 165 citations

Abstract

The ‘phase-space’ method in quantum theory is used to derive exact expressions for the transition probabilities of a perturbed oscillator. Comparison with the approximate results obtained by perturbation methods shows that the latter must be multiplied by an exponential factor exp (− ∊/ℏω), where ∊ is the non-fluctuating part of the work done by the perturbing forces; as long as ∊ is small, exp (− ∊/ℏω) ˜ 1 and only dipole transitions have an appreciable probability. As the perturbation energy increases, however, this is no longer true, and multipole transitions become progressively more probable, the most probable ones being those for which the change in energy is approximately equal to the work done by the perturbing forces.

DOI: 10.1017/s030500410002524x

Related papers

Oscillator Semiclassical Phase Space Probability versus a Quantum Mechanical Approach

Francesco R. Ruggeri

The Maxwell-Boltzmann probability factor exp(-energy/T) / normalization may be applied to a quantum oscillator using energy levels given by hbar w (n+.5). This leads to the derivative in 1/T of a geometric series and yields an average energy: Eave = hbar w/2 + hbar w / (-1+exp(hbar w/T)). If one were to consider a semiclassical approach using p (momentum and x), energy would be described by pp/2 + xx/2 where for simplicity m=1 and k=1. This would appear in the MB factor with a temperature T and this expression would be expected to hold for high T or w/T small i.e. the quantum phonon jumps would be hardly noticeable compared to the average energy T in this limit. If one tries to write the classical energy, for w/T small, in the form of quantum energy, one has hbar w n in this limit, where n is the number of phonons (hbarw/2 is small in this limit) so: zz= {pp/2+kk/2}/w is the number of phonons which should be multiplied by hbar w/T. One may then ask: What function has the limit hbar w/T? A solution is: {1-exp(-hbarw/T)}. Thus the semiclassical normalized phase space probability: P(p,x) = {1-exp(-hbarw/T)}. Exp{ - zz {1-exp(-hbarw/T)} } yields the small hbar w/T limit quantum average energy. As a result, the average energy in this limit should match for both the classical phase space distribution and the quantum average energy expression. This classical distribution happens to be identical to the Husimi distribution. One may note (as is done in (1)), that {1-exp(-hbarw/T)} is the probability for the quantum oscillator particle to be in the ground state. In the limit of hbar w/T small, this probability is hbar w/T which is a measure of the effect of the quantum phonon leaps as well. Fisher’s information, as noted in (1), is equivalent to this ground state probability, but it is also the average energy which is proportional to the temperature type value, in this case {1-exp(-hbarw/T)}. This follows from the same kind of calculation done for a gas with particles with energy pp/2m, although instead of a factor of .5T one T because there is a contribution from pp/2 and xx/2.

Apr 29, 20230 citations

Rabi oscillations in many-level quantum system

Alexander Alexandrovich Biryukov, B. V. Danilyuk

The object of the research are the quantum transitions of a many-level system between its stationary states under the influence of an alternating external electric field. The transition amplitudes and probabilities are calculated by the method of perturbation theory in the approximation of a classical external field. It is illustrated that in the case when the external field frequency is equal to the frequency of any quantum transition, then the probability of this transition fluctuate nearly the average value which is oscillating with Rabi frequency. Probabilities of other quantum transitions are very small and change chaotically with time.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIEMar 3, 20083 citations

Time-dependent perturbation and exact results for the periodically driven quantum harmonic oscillator

Russell Akridge

Transition amplitudes and probabilities for the harmonic oscillator with a forcing function proportional to cos(ωt) beginning at time zero are calculated to lowest nonvanishing order using time-dependent perturbation theory. The results are compared with the exact amplitudes and probabilities. When the exact amplitude is expanded in a Taylor series in powers of the coupling constant, the individual terms turn out to be the perturbation amplitudes, showing that the complete series of perturbation amplitudes converges to the exact amplitude.

American Journal of PhysicsFeb 1, 19955 citations

Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory in Quantum Phase Space

Qian‐Shu Li

Time-dependent perturbation theory is discussed within the quantum phase space representation as formulated by Torres-Vega and Frederick(T-F) and the quantum transition probability is studied.Time-dependent perturbation formula in T-F quantum phase space is established,in accordance with the calculation theory in T-F phase space.As an example,the one dimensional harmonic oscillator system,affected by an external electric field,is used to calculate in T-F phase space,the result indicate that the principle of the method is correct.Quantum transition probability of the system's first excited state in T-F phase space is discussed.

Transactions of Beijing Institute of TechnologyJan 1, 20090 citations

Quantum transition probabilities during a perturbing pulse: Differences between the nonadiabatic results and Fermi’s golden rule forms

Anirban Mandal, Katharine L. C. Hunt

For a perturbed quantum system initially in the ground state, the coefficient ck(t) of excited state k in the time-dependent wave function separates into adiabatic and nonadiabatic terms. The adiabatic term ak(t) accounts for the adjustment of the original ground state to form the new ground state of the instantaneous Hamiltonian H(t), by incorporating excited states of the unperturbed Hamiltonian H0 without transitions; ak(t) follows the adiabatic theorem of Born and Fock. The nonadiabatic term bk(t) describes excitation into another quantum state k; bk(t) is obtained as an integral containing the time derivative of the perturbation. The true transition probability is given by bk(t)2, as first stated by Landau and Lifshitz. In this work, we contrast bk(t)2 and ck(t)2. The latter is the norm-square of the entire excited-state coefficient which is used for the transition probability within Fermi’s golden rule. Calculations are performed for a perturbing pulse consisting of a cosine or sine wave in a Gaussian envelope. When the transition frequency ωk0 is on resonance with the frequency ω of the cosine wave, bk(t)2 and ck(t)2 rise almost monotonically to the same final value; the two are intertwined, but they are out of phase with each other. Off resonance (when ωk0 ≠ ω), bk(t)2 and ck(t)2 differ significantly during the pulse. They oscillate out of phase and reach different maxima but then fall off to equal final values after the pulse has ended, when ak(t) ≡ 0. If ωk0 < ω, bk(t)2 generally exceeds ck(t)2, while the opposite is true when ωk0 > ω. While the transition probability is rising, the midpoints between successive maxima and minima fit Gaussian functions of the form a exp[−b(t − d)2]. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of nonadiabatic transition probabilities during a perturbing pulse.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsMay 17, 20188 citations

Oscillator Semiclassical Phase Space Probability versus a Quantum Mechanical Approach Part II

Francesco R. Ruggeri

In this note we consider, as in (1), finding an oscillator quantum state |z> (called the coherent state) such that <z| exp(-Hamiltonian/T |z> yields a classical-like phase space probability distribution in p and x. In (1) the approach is to use the known weights of <z|n> where Hamiltonian |n> = en |n>. Here we use instead the following ideas. First, we argue that for exp(-Hamiltonian/T) to be used at all, P(e1)P(e2)=P(e1+e2), but also P(z1*z1)P(z2*z2) = P(z1*z1+z2*z2) where z*z = pp/2+xx/2 with k=m=1. This yields a solution of exp(- b z*z) where b is unknown. In the limit of hbar w/T <<1, i.e. the classical limit, P(z*z) should become the Maxwell-Boltzmann factor exp(- (pp/2T + xx/2T). Writing |z> as a linear superposition of the energy eigenfunctions |n> one may find a solution for |z>, the coherent state which has an average of (pp/2+xx/2)/ hbar w phonons/photons. P(z*z) is called the Husimi distribution.

May 1, 20230 citations