Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Compatible statistical interpretation of a wave packet

Mirjana Božić, Z. Marić

Published Jan 1, 1995• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02054663

Related papers

Schrödinger Wave Mechanics: Canonical Equation Atlas and USP-Compatible Resonance Commentary

Sadegh Sepehri

How much of Schrödinger’s mathematical work can inform a modern resonance-geometry interpretation without rewriting the history of quantum mechanics? msf:53020 v2.0.1 is a historical and mathematical atlas spanning the structures most relevant to stationary quantum states and future USP development. The document separates four layers throughout: historical source mathematics, modern normalized formulation, USP-compatible interpretation, and explicit limits on what the mathematics establishes. The atlas covers eigenvalue quantization, wave/matrix equivalence, variational methods, hydrogen, the harmonic oscillator, perturbation theory, wave packets, probability current and continuity, uncertainty covariance, energy exchange, Dirac slow/fast motion, curved-spacetime spinors, endpoint-conditioned diffusion, global phase, expanding-geometry modes, factorization, entanglement, quantum jumps, and measurement. The stationary-state architecture remains standard quantum mechanics: Ĥψₙ = Eₙψₙ, Ψₙ(r,t) = ψₙ(r)e^(−iEₙt/ℏ). USP-compatible resonance language is introduced only as an interpretation of already-defined quantum structures. It does not replace the Hamiltonian, Born statistics, spinor structure, phase/current information, or detector theory. Historical compatibility is not evidence for a USP substrate or new dynamics. No nonzero USP residual is claimed: A_USP = 0. *SHORT ZENODO SUMMARY A historical-mathematical atlas of Schrödinger wave mechanics spanning eigenvalue quantization, uncertainty covariance, wave packets, relativistic and curved-space structures, factorization, entanglement, and measurement. USP-compatible resonance language is kept strictly interpretive, with standard quantum mechanics as the predictive baseline and A_USP = 0 as the exact null.

•Aug 21, 2026•0 citations

Wave packet formulation

Phil Attard

Institute of Physics eBooks•Nov 1, 2021•0 citations

COMPLETE SETS OF WAVE-PACKETS

Francis E. Low

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 1985•111 citations

Measurement in Quantum Mechanics. II

Hitoshi Wakita

The theory of measurement is reasonably interpreted without any abrupt and noncausal change of a state, namely, with no “reduction of a wave packet”, in the framework of quantum mechanics. Though a process of measurement is causal in the usual quantum-mechanical sense, it is possible to utilize the concept of the “reduction of a wave packet” without any loss of compatibility. The Stern-Gerlach experiment is put to a careful study to show that the present interpretation is consistent with experiment.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1962•7 citations

Statistical properties of ensembles of classical wave packets

Sherman Karp

Over the past two decades there has been a renewed interest in the properties of light and its interactions with matter. In particular, the phenomenon of mixing on the surface of a quantum detector, first performed by Forrester and Gudmundsen, has had significant impact on the treatment of the interaction of light with matter. Mandel and Wolf have interpreted optical mixing of two fields in terms of wave-packet interactions. The wave packets of the fields were allowed to add in a classical manner, without any interaction between photons. In this paper, we consider the extension to an ensemble of statistical wave packets. This is accomplished by considering the wave-packet ensemble as a generalized shot-noise process, and generating statistical properties of the ensemble. The first-order probability density is obtained for the envelope of an ensemble in which each member has uniform and independently distributed phase. This is then used to compute the resulting photoelectron-counting distribution. The results can be shown to be somewhat different than would arise from a gaussian field, and a statistical test is derived to compare the two.

Journal of the Optical Society of America•Apr 1, 1975•8 citations

INELASTIC SCATTERING OF A WAVE PACKET

F. Bunchaft, C.M. Chaves, W. Baltensperger

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências•Jan 1, 1965•0 citations
How much of Schrödinger’s mathematical work can inform a modern resonance-geometry interpretation without rewriting the history of quantum mechanics? msf:53020 v2.0.1 is a historical and mathematical atlas spanning the structures most relevant to stationary quantum states and future USP development. The document separates four layers throughout: historical source mathematics, modern normalized formulation, USP-compatible interpretation, and explicit limits on what the mathematics establishes. The atlas covers eigenvalue quantization, wave/matrix equivalence, variational methods, hydrogen, the harmonic oscillator, perturbation theory, wave packets, probability current and continuity, uncertainty covariance, energy exchange, Dirac slow/fast motion, curved-spacetime spinors, endpoint-conditioned diffusion, global phase, expanding-geometry modes, factorization, entanglement, quantum jumps, and measurement. The stationary-state architecture remains standard quantum mechanics: Ĥψₙ = Eₙψₙ, Ψₙ(r,t) = ψₙ(r)e^(−iEₙt/ℏ). USP-compatible resonance language is introduced only as an interpretation of already-defined quantum structures. It does not replace the Hamiltonian, Born statistics, spinor structure, phase/current information, or detector theory. Historical compatibility is not evidence for a USP substrate or new dynamics. No nonzero USP residual is claimed: A_USP = 0. *SHORT ZENODO SUMMARY A historical-mathematical atlas of Schrödinger wave mechanics spanning eigenvalue quantization, uncertainty covariance, wave packets, relativistic and curved-space structures, factorization, entanglement, and measurement. USP-compatible resonance language is kept strictly interpretive, with standard quantum mechanics as the predictive baseline and A_USP = 0 as the exact null.
The theory of measurement is reasonably interpreted without any abrupt and noncausal change of a state, namely, with no “reduction of a wave packet”, in the framework of quantum mechanics. Though a process of measurement is causal in the usual quantum-mechanical sense, it is possible to utilize the concept of the “reduction of a wave packet” without any loss of compatibility. The Stern-Gerlach experiment is put to a careful study to show that the present interpretation is consistent with experiment.
Over the past two decades there has been a renewed interest in the properties of light and its interactions with matter. In particular, the phenomenon of mixing on the surface of a quantum detector, first performed by Forrester and Gudmundsen, has had significant impact on the treatment of the interaction of light with matter. Mandel and Wolf have interpreted optical mixing of two fields in terms of wave-packet interactions. The wave packets of the fields were allowed to add in a classical manner, without any interaction between photons. In this paper, we consider the extension to an ensemble of statistical wave packets. This is accomplished by considering the wave-packet ensemble as a generalized shot-noise process, and generating statistical properties of the ensemble. The first-order probability density is obtained for the envelope of an ensemble in which each member has uniform and independently distributed phase. This is then used to compute the resulting photoelectron-counting distribution. The results can be shown to be somewhat different than would arise from a gaussian field, and a statistical test is derived to compare the two.