Fisher's measure of information is compared to the usual measure of sensitivity of the SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers. The states of optimum Fisher information measure and prescribed mean photon-number difference are defined, and the properties of these states are studied in the SU(2) interferometer.
The SU(2) group is used in two different fields of quantum optics, the quantum polarization and quantum interferometry.Quantum degrees of polarization may be based on distances of a polarization state from the set of unpolarized states.The maximum polarization is achieved in the case where the state is pure and then the distribution of the photon-number sums is optimized.In quantum interferometry, the SU(2) intelligent states have also the property that the Fisher measure of information is equal to the inverse minimum detectable phase shift on the usual simplifying condition.Previously, the optimization of the Fisher information under a constraint was studied.Now, in the framework of constraint optimization, states similar to the SU(2) intelligent states are treated.
With the rapid development of quantum technologies in recent years, the need for high-sensitivity measuring techniques has become a key issue. In particular, optical sensors based on quantum states of light have proven to be optimal resources for high-precision interferometry. Nevertheless, their performance may be severely affected by the presence of noise or imperfections. In this work, we derive the quantum Fisher information matrix associated with the simultaneous estimation of an interferometric phase and the indistinguishability characterizing the probe state consisting of an even number of photons. We find the optimal measurement attaining the ultimate precision for both parameters in a single setup and perform an experiment based on a pair of photons with an unknown degree of indistinguishability entering a two-port interferometer.
The quantum Fisher information (QFI) in SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers was considered, and the QFI-only calculation was overestimated. In general, the phase estimation as a two-parameter estimation problem, and the quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM) is necessary. In this paper, we theoretically generalize the model developed by Escher et al [Nature Physics 7, 406 (2011)] to the QFIM case with noise and study the ultimate precision limits of SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers with photon losses because photon losses as a very usual noise may happen to the phase measurement process. Using coherent state and squeezed vacuum state as a specific example, we numerically analyze the variation of the overestimated QFI with the loss coefficient, and find its disappearance and recovery phenomenon.
Squeezed-state interferometry plays an important role in quantum-enhanced optical phase estimation, as it allows the estimation precision to be improved up to the Heisenberg limit by using ideal photon-number-resolving detectors at the output ports. Here we show that for each individual N-photon component of the phase-matched coherent $\ensuremath{\bigotimes}$ squeezed vacuum input state, the classical Fisher information always saturates the quantum Fisher information. Moreover, the total Fisher information is the sum of the contributions from each individual N-photon component, where the largest N is limited by the finite number resolution of available photon counters. Based on this observation, we provide an approximate analytical formula that quantifies the amount of lost information due to the finite photon number resolution; e.g., given the mean photon number n in the input state, over 96% of the Heisenberg limit can be achieved with the number resolution larger than 5n.
We theoretically derive the lower and upper bounds of quantum Fisher information (QFI) of an SU(1,1) interferometer whatever the input state chosen. According to the QFI, the crucial resource for quantum enhancement is shown to be large intramode correlations indicated by the Mandel Q parameter. The subtraction of photons from the squeezed vacuum state has the effect of increasing the average photon number of the new field state, as well as the intramode correlations. For example, for a coherent state $\ensuremath{\bigotimes}$ a squeezed vacuum state with a given fixed input mean number of photons as the input, if p photons are subtracted from the squeezed-vacuum state before inputting the SU(1,1) interferometer, the phase sensitivities can be improved due to the intramode-correlation increment.