Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Comments on `The question of completeness and locality in Liddy's hidden variable theory'

D E Liddy

Published May 11, 1985• 0 citations

Abstract

Liddy in his reply to Lehr's comment, while not wholly agreeing with the criticism, does concede that the theories he presented are not totally viable.

DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/18/7/023

Related papers

The question of completeness and locality in Liddy's hidden variable theory

William J. Lehr

Lehr considers that more details are required about the hidden variable model proposed by Liddy (1983, 1984) before it can be said to be a complete objective local hidden variable theory.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and GeneralMay 11, 19850 citations

A local hidden-variable theory that, FAPP, agrees with quantum theory

Euan J. Squires

Physics Letters AJul 1, 199312 citations

A note on the locality of Gudder's hidden-variable theory

Masao Nagasawa, Jörg Schröder

Chaos Solitons & FractalsNov 1, 19972 citations

Reply to a comment of I. Schmelzer

Schulz, Benjamin

This is a reply to the comment of Schmelzer on my earlier paper. In contrast to Schmelzer's claims, it is shown that passive locality does not correspond to the completeness condition of EPR. Nevertheless, it is argued that Schmelzer has found several errors in my article which, fortunately, can be corrected. In spite of Schmelzer's arguments, the Fritsche-Haugk theory can be used to define a local hidden variable theory for the singlet state.

arXiv:0910.5660Oct 29, 20090 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘All quantum observables in a hidden-variable model must commute simultaneously’” [Phys. Rev. A73, 066101 (2006)]

James D. Malley, Arthur I. Fine

Nagata [Phys. Rev. A 73, 066101 (2006)] questions whether a general no-go theorem of Malley [Phys. Rev. A 69, 022118 (2004)] applies to local hidden variables and outlines a ``counterexample.'' In fact this is not a counterexample at all, but in seeing why it fails we clarify the significance of Malley's result and its relation to other no-go theorems.

Physical Review AJun 14, 20062 citations

Comments on Shimony’s “An Analysis of Stapp’s ‘A Bell-Type Theorem without Hidden Variables’ ”

Henry Pierce Stapp

Foundations of PhysicsJan 1, 20065 citations