A local hidden-variable theory that, FAPP, agrees with quantum theory

Koji Nagata

Jonathan P. Dowling

Now that we have a few more concepts under our belts, I would like to go back and revisit in some more detail just what John Bell proved in 1964 about entangled states. He considered a simple quantum situation like the entangled ions in Alice and Bob’s pocket watches and then set about to compare the predictions of quantum theory for such a setup to the predictions of a classical hidden variable theory that had all of Einstein’s constraints: reality, locality, and certainty. Remember-there was already the Bohm hidden variable theory, well known in 1964, which did predict the same outcome as quantum theory, but this Bohm theory doesn’t count because it violates Einstein’s locality condition. (Einstein thumbs his nose at the Bohmians.) Bell’s goal was to see if he could construct a local classical hidden variable theory that would agree with all the predictions of quantum theory and satisfy Einstein’s three conditions. If such a hidden variable theory could be found, then it would be tempting to just replace quantum theory with that hidden variable theory and all the spookiness would just disappear. But in order for this project to succeed, the classical hidden variable theory had to obey all three of Einstein’s reality, locality, and certainty conditions and reproduce all the predictions of quantum theory. at was just too tall of an order to ask of any local hidden variable theory, Bell discovered. Something, somewhere, had to give.

Emilio Santos

Vandana Shiva

Abner Shimony

The study of hidden-variable interpretations of quantum mechanics was transformed by two papers of Bell. In his 1966 paper in Reviews of Modern Physics [1] he analysed the argument of von Neumann [2] and the more powerful arguments of Jauch and Piron [3] and of Gleason [4], all leading to similar conclusions about the nonassignability of simultaneous values to all the observables of a nontrivial quantum system; and he showed that these arguments do not exclude what may be called “contextualistic” hidden-variable theories, in which the value of an observable O is allowed to depend not only upon the hidden state λ, but also upon the set C of compatible observables measured along with O . In Bell's 1964 paper in Physics [5] (written later than the other, in spite of the earlier publication date) he gave a new kind of argument against a hidden-variable interpretation of quantum mechanics, by showing that no hidden-variables theory which satisfies a certain condition of locality can agree with all the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics. The main purpose of this lecture is to discuss an experiment, designed by Clauser, Horne, Holt and myself [6], which is based on Bell's proof of the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and local hidden-variable theories. Before doing this, however, I wish to make several comments.

Alberto Casado, Trevor W. Marshall, Ramón Risco +1 more

In previous articles we have developed a theory of down conversion in nonlinear crystals, based on the Wigner representation of the radiation field. Taking advantage of the fact that the Wigner function is always positive in parametric down conversion experiments, we construct a local hidden variables model where the amplitudes of the field modes are taken as random variables whose probability distribution is the Wigner function. In order to achieve our goal we give a model of detection which is fully local but departs from quantum theory. In our model the zeropoint (vacuum) level of radiation lies below a threshold of the detectors and only signals above the threshold are detectable. The predictions of the model agree with those of quantum mechanics if the signal intensities surpase some level and the efficiency is low. This is consistent with the known fact that quantum mechanics is compatible with local realism in that case (a fact called the ``efficiency loophole''). Our model gives a number of constraints which do not follow from the quantum theory of detection and are experimentally testable.