Under certain conditions it is possible to describe time evolution using different times for different particles. Use of multiple times is optional in the independent particle approximation, where interparticle interactions are removed, and the N-particle evolution operator factors into N single-particle evolution operators. In this limit one may use either a single time, with a single energy-time Fourier transform, or N different times with a different energy-time transform for each particle. The use of different times for different particles is fully justified when coherence between single-particle amplitudes is lost, e.g., if relatively strong randomly fluctuating residual fields influence each particle independently. However, when spatial correlation is present the use of multiple times is not feasible, even when the evolution of the particles is uncorrelated in time. Some calculations in simple atomic systems with and without spatial and temporal correlation between different electrons are included.
Under certain conditions it is possible to describe time evolution using different times for different particles. Use of multiple times is optional in the independent particle approximation, where interparticle interactions are removed, and the N-particle evolution operator factors into N single-particle evolution operators. In this limit one may use either a single time, with a single energy-time Fourier transform, or N different times with a different energy-time transform for each particle. The use of different times for different particles is fully justified when coherence between single-particle amplitudes is lost, e.g., if relatively strong randomly fluctuating residual fields influence each particle independently. However, when spatial correlation is present the use of multiple times is not feasible, even when the evolution of the particles is uncorrelated in time. Some calculations in simple atomic systems with and without spatial and temporal correlation between different electrons are included.
If we consider ( ) 2,kr tΨ G to be the probability density for finding, at time t, particle 1 at particle k at and particle N at ,,1 … Gr …G ,kr ,Nr G a normalization condition analogous to Eq.(29.2) holds as (35.2) 1V* =ΨΨ∫ d The integral is defined in a space with 3N dimensions called the configuration space of the system, where a configuration point is given by 3N position coordinates 1 1 1, , , , , , , , , ,k k k N N N ,x y z x y z x y z… … and the volume element is NNNkkkNk dzdydxdzdydxdzdydxdddd ………… 1111 VVVV == Physical observables of the system will be represented by Hermitian operators, obtained from the classical representation in terms of the position and momentum variables as indicated by Postulate 2. Thus the many-particle Hamiltonian results from Eq.(2.32) as ( ) (∑ ∑ = ≠ ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ++∇−= k rrUtrU m H ,, 2 ˆ GGG= ) ) (35.3) where only acts on the coordinates of the kth particle, of mass The one-particle potential energy is due to external fields where this particle moves and k∇ .km( trU kk ,G( )jkkj rrU GG , gives the mutual interaction between the particles k and j. It is assumed that the position and momentum operators of different particles commute, and so do all the operators describing single-particle observables if they refer to different particles. The evolution of a many-particle system will be then formulated as a generalization of Eq.(30.6) in terms of given by Eqs.(35.1) and (35.3) HˆandΨ Ψ=∂ Ψ∂ H t i ˆ= (35.4) If the Hamiltonian (35.3) does not depend explicitly on the time, it is usual to express the time dependence of the many-particle state function by means of the evolution operator defined as ( )tUˆ ( ) ( ) ( )NkNk rrrtUtrrr G…G…GG…G…G ,,,,ˆ,,,,, 11 αΨ=Ψ (35.5) which is formally derived from Eq.(35.4) as ( ) ( ) ( )ˆˆ ˆU ti U t i HU t t t ˆα α α ∂∂ ⎡ ⎤Ψ = Ψ =⎣ ⎦∂ ∂= = Ψ It follows that (35.6) ( ) =/ˆˆ tHietU −= which is the analogue of Eq.(30.12). The evolution operator is unitary, Eq.(II.22), since ( ) ( )†ˆ ˆU t U t Iˆ= (35.7) Substituting Eq.(35.5), one obtains from Eq.(35.4) that the stationary states of the Nparticle systems are given by the energy eigenvalue equation ( ) ( )1 1ˆ , , , , , , , ,k N k NH r r r E r r rα α αΨ = ΨG G G G G G… … … … (35.8) The solution to the N-particle problem is facilitated if we take into account the symmetries of many systems of physical interest, which allow us to define constants of motion and criteria for simplifying the form (35.3) of the Hamiltonian operator. An alternative to complex explicit calculations is to associate with specific symmetries time independent unitary operators which transform the state functions into so that Eq.(35.4) gives ˆ ,U Ψ ˆ ,U Ψ ( ) ( )†ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆi U i U UH UHU Ut t∂ ∂ΨΨ = = Ψ = Ψ∂ ∂= = ˆ This is again a Schrödinger equation for the state Uˆ Ψ with the new Hamiltonian †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆH UHU′ = If the Hamiltonian remains unchanged by the transformation, we have (35.9) †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆor , 0H UHU U H⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦ = According to the evolution equation (29.43), this implies that so that U is a constant of motion. If the unitary transformation which leaves the Hamiltonian invariant, is a function of an observable, its constancy implies that the given observable is a constant in any state of the system.
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics of N particles in three spatial dimensions, the wave function ψ ( q 1 , ..., q N , t ) is a function of 3 N position coordinates and one time coordinate. It is an obvious idea that in a relativistic setting, such functions should be replaced by ϕ (( t 1 , q 1 ), ..., ( t N , q N )), a function of N space-time points called a multi-time wave function because it involves N time variables. Its evolution is determined by N Schrödinger equations, one for each time variable; to ensure that simultaneous solutions to these N equations exist, the N Hamiltonians need to satisfy a consistency condition. This condition is automatically satisfied for non-interacting particles, but it is not obvious how to set up consistent multi-time equations with interaction. For example, interaction potentials (such as the Coulomb potential) make the equations inconsistent, except in very special cases. However, there have been recent successes in setting up consistent multi-time equations involving interaction, in two ways: either involving zero-range ( δ potential) interaction or involving particle creation and annihilation. The latter equations provide a multi-time formulation of a quantum field theory. The wave function in these equations is a multi-time Fock function, i.e., a family of functions consisting of, for every n = 0, 1, 2, ..., an n -particle wave function with n time variables. These wave functions are related to the Tomonaga–Schwinger approach and to quantum field operators, but, as we point out, they have several advantages.
We propose an independent time approximation (ITA), defined by simplifying the chronological operator, namely, TTunc, where Tunc is the uncorrelated limit of the chronological operator T. The concept of the time correlation is analogous to spatial electron correlation. In both cases `correlation' is the difference between an exact result and an uncorrelated limit. In the uncorrelated ITA the time correlation operator Tcor = T-Tunc is neglected and causality between electrons is lost. In second-order calculations of a two-electron transition the ITA reduces computer time by over two orders of magnitude. Greater savings are expected when higher orders or more electrons are included.
Abstract It is shown that the relevant part of an equilibrium two-time correlation function of operators related to a subsystem of S < N particles, selected from the whole system of N ≫ 1 quantum particles, obeys the exact completely closed (homogeneous) evolution equation. This equation differs from the conventional Nakajima–Zwanzig equation by the absence of the undesirable inhomogeneous term comprising all interparticle correlations at the initial time moment. The equation defines the subdynamics in a subspace of S selected particles and is obtained without any use of approximation like the Boltzmann ‘molecular chaos’, factorized initial state or Bogoliubov’s principle of weakening of initial correlations. In the second order in a small inter-particle interaction, this equation reduces to the Markovian evolution equation, which for a one-particle correlation function ( S = 1) takes the form of the linear generalized quantum Boltzmann-like equation for a relevant part of a correlation function (one particle momentum distribution function) with the additional terms conditioned by initial correlations taken into account. This equation makes it possible to obtain the solution for the corresponding one-particle correlation function, which is valid for all timescales and reveals the influence of initial correlations on the evolution in time process. On a large timescale t ≫ t cor ∼ ℏ / k B T (decoherence time), the initial correlations cease to influence the damping process and the evolution enters a kinetic stage. However, the factor related to initial correlations survives on the large timescale, and can contribute to the kinetic coefficients.
The postulates of quantum mechanics and their consequences, which have been developed to describe a single particle, are still valid when applied to a system of N particles. The system can be described by a wave function Ψ which depends on the time and on the 3 N coordinates of all the particles: 10.1 Ψ = Ψ ( r → 1 , … r → i , … r → N , t ) = Ψ ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 , … , x i , y i , z i , … x N , y N , z N , t ) https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003078265/e77b8ce0-ccb3-48ed-9f6d-a84c8cb529c5/content/eqn10_1_B.tif"/>