We analyze a one dimensional quantum system consisting of a test particle interacting with two harmonic oscillators placed at the positions a1 and a2, with a1>0 and ∣a2∣>a1, in the two possible situations: a2>0 and a2<0. At time zero, the harmonic oscillators are in their ground state and the test particle is in a superposition state of two wave packets centered in the origin with opposite mean momentum. Under suitable assumptions on the physical parameters of the model, we consider the time evolution of the wave function and we compute the probability Pn1n2−(t) [Pn1n2+(t)] that both oscillators are in the excited states labeled by n1 and n2>0 at time t>∣a2∣v0−1 when a2<0 (a2>0). We prove that Pn1n2−(t) is negligible with respect to Pn1n2+(t) up to second order in time dependent perturbation theory. The system we consider is a simplified, one dimensional version of the original model of a cloud chamber introduced by Mott [“The wave mechanics of α-ray tracks,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 126, 79 (1929)], where the result was argued using euristic arguments in the framework of the time independent perturbation theory for the stationary Schrödinger equation. The method of the proof is entirely elementary and it is essentially based on a stationary phase argument. We also remark that all the computations refer to the Schrödinger equation for the three-particle system, with no reference to the wave packet collapse postulate.
We analyze a one dimensional quantum system consisting of a test particle interacting with two harmonic oscillators placed at the positions a1 and a2, with a1>0 and ∣a2∣>a1, in the two possible situations: a2>0 and a2<0. At time zero, the harmonic oscillators are in their ground state and the test particle is in a superposition state of two wave packets centered in the origin with opposite mean momentum. Under suitable assumptions on the physical parameters of the model, we consider the time evolution of the wave function and we compute the probability Pn1n2−(t) [Pn1n2+(t)] that both oscillators are in the excited states labeled by n1 and n2>0 at time t>∣a2∣v0−1 when a2<0 (a2>0). We prove that Pn1n2−(t) is negligible with respect to Pn1n2+(t) up to second order in time dependent perturbation theory. The system we consider is a simplified, one dimensional version of the original model of a cloud chamber introduced by Mott [“The wave mechanics of α-ray tracks,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 126, 79 (1929)], where the result was argued using euristic arguments in the framework of the time independent perturbation theory for the stationary Schrödinger equation. The method of the proof is entirely elementary and it is essentially based on a stationary phase argument. We also remark that all the computations refer to the Schrödinger equation for the three-particle system, with no reference to the wave packet collapse postulate.
We analyze a one dimensional quantum system consisting of a test particle interacting with two harmonic oscillators placed at the positions a1, a2, with a1>0, ∣a2∣>a1, in the two possible situations: a2>0 and a2<0. At time zero the harmonic oscillators are in their ground state and the test particle is in a superposition state of two wave packets centered in the origin with opposite mean momentum. %±Mv0. Under suitable assumptions on the physical parameters of the model, we consider the time evolution of the wave function and we compute the probability Pn1n2−(t) (resp. Pn1n2+(t)) that both oscillators are in the excited states labelled by n1, n2>0 at time t>∣a2∣v0−1 when a2<0 (resp. a2>0). We prove that Pn1n2−(t) is negligible with respect to Pn1n2+(t), up to second order in time dependent perturbation theory. The system we consider is a simplified, one dimensional version of the original model of a cloud chamber introduced by Mott in \cite{m}, where the result was argued using euristic arguments in the framework of the time independent perturbation theory for the stationary Schrödinger equation. The method of the proof is entirely elementary and it is essentially based on a stationary phase argument. We also remark that all the computations refer to the Schrödinger equation for the three-particle system, with no reference to the wave packet collapse postulate.
The dynamics of an initially excital Gaussian wave packet (harmonic oscillator coherent state, HOCS) in a general one-dimensional anharmonic system is studied analytically with the aid of a second quantization formalism for times shorter than a classical oscillation period. The initial state population probability PQ(t), its classical counterpart PC(t), and the overlap probability PQC(t) between a time evolved wave packet and a classically moving Gaussian with stationary shape are calculated in order to analyze the spreading of the wave packet. It was found that, in general, PQ(t) and PC(t) agree very well if the potential energy function has no strongly changing low order derivatives. This agreement is held even if the wave packet spreads drastically within the time scale considered as can be demonstrated by analyzing PQC(t). The analytical expressions for PQ(t), PC(t), and PQC(t) are applied to a dissociative third-order oscillator and a strongly anharmonic fourth-order oscillator. While for a harmonic system, the initial decay time of PQ(t) and PC(t) (which are identical in this case) are only dependent on the energy expectation value 〈H〉 with respect to the initial HOCS, differences up to an order of magnitude occur for HOCS with the same energy in the model systems.
The problem investigated refers to periodically driven 1D quantum inverted harmonic oscillator (IHO) with the Hamiltonian of . The model is used widely in huge quantum applications concerned unstable molecular complexes and ions under laser light affection. Non-stationary Schrödinger equation (NSE) was solved analytically and numerically by means of Maple 17 with initial wave function (w.f.) of generalized Gaussian type. This one described the converging 1D probability flux and fitted well the quantum operator of initial conditions (IC). For the IC one can observe, first, the collapse of w.f. packet into extremely narrow 1D space interval of length and, second, its spreading back up to its starting half width, and all that - at dimensionless times. At certain phases j defined by W and s0 the wave packet center displayed nonharmonic oscillating behavior near some slowly drifting space position within this time interval and after that leaved onto infinity while the unlimited packet spreading. And the phases themselves served as bifurcation points separating the NSE solutions with the outgoing to from those with. In “resonant” case of the values obeyed an inverted Fermi-Dirac formula of; for differing the asymptotic of obeyed well classical law.
The Schrödinger equation is a significant achievement on the development of quantum mechanics. By solving the Schrödinger equation, the fundamental behaviors and properties of a microscopic particle can be found in one- to three-dimensions. The article focuses on the derivations of quantum harmonic oscillators in one dimension by solving second order-differential equation. The wave functions, probability densities under different energy levels are presented. The results can be used to estimate different forms of continuous potential experienced by an oscillator. By calculating the uncertainty relation of the oscillator under one specific excited state, the general relation can be confirmed. Based on the output, by splitting the variables, the two-dimensional harmonic oscillator can also be derived. The degenerate energy levels are presented as . Numerical simulations are made to visualize those results and suggests the relation of energy levels and number of maxima of the probability densities.
Abstract We consider the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator potential and determine its bound states and energy levels in one spatial dimension using two approaches: the algebraic and the analytic method. Using the former, we introduce ladder operators: the annihilation and creation operators, as well as the occupation-number operator, and determine the ground state of the harmonic oscillator to be a Gaussian wave packet, while the latter method yields the general bound state solutions in terms of the Hermite polynomials. We further discuss the zero-point energy and uncertainty relation for the quantum harmonic oscillator and make a comparison to the classical harmonic oscillator. Finally, we examine the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, which leads us to the description of systems with multiple degrees of freedom via the tensor product