Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Modern Physics B

Quantum Statistics of Cooper Pairs; Superconducting Temperature

Shigeji Fujita, David L. Morabito

Published Aug 20, 1998• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We show that the eigenvalues of the number operator [Formula: see text] in the pair state (k1, k2), where c's and c†'s are fermion operators, are limited to 0 or 1, while the eigenvalues of the pair-number operator with the net momentum q≡ k1+k2 fixed, [Formula: see text], are 0, 1, 2,…. Both fermionic and bosonic natures of the Cooper pairs (pairons) must be used in the superconductivity theory. The Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) of the pairons moving with a linear energy–momentum relation occurs at [Formula: see text] (3D), [Formula: see text] (2D), where n0 is the pairon density and v F the Fermi velocity. The connection between this [Formula: see text] and the BCS superconducting temperature is discussed.

DOI
10.1142/s0217979298001277

Related papers

Statistical properties of the Cooper pair operators

Ilya G. Kaplan, Oracio Navarro, J. A. Sánchez

Abstract The Cooper pair has the total spin S = 0. So, in accordance with the Pauli principle, the wave functions describing the Cooper pair system should have the boson permutation symmetry, but the pairon operators (Cooper's pair operators) do not obey the boson commutation relations. The pairon operators may not be considered neither as the Bose operators, nor as the Fermi operators. In this work, we analyze the statistical properties and the commutation relations for the pairon operator and reveal that they correspond to the modified parafermi statistics of rank p = 1. Two different expressions for the Cooper pair number operator are presented. We demonstrate that the calculations with a Hamiltonian expressed via pairon operators is more convenient using the commutation properties of these operators without presenting them as a product of fermion operators. This allows to study problems in which the interactions between Cooper's pair are also included. The problem of two interacting Cooper's pairs is discussed. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

physica status solidi (b)•Jun 14, 2005•4 citations

Generalized Bose-Einstein condensation in superconductivity and superfluidity

MANUEL DE LLANO, Rocio R. Jauregui, J. Récamier +1 more

Unification of the Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (BCS) and the Bose‐Einstein condensation (BEC) theories is surveyed in terms of a generalized BEC (GBEC) finite‐temperature statistical formalism. A vital distinction is that Cooper pairs (CPs) are true bosons that may suffer a BEC since they obey BE statistics, in contrast with BCS pairs that are “hard‐core bosons” at best. A second crucial ingredient is the explicit presence of hole‐pairs (2h) alongside the usual electron‐pairs (2e). A third critical element (particularly in 2D where ordinary BEC does not occur) is the linear dispersion relation of CPs in leading order in the center‐of‐mass momentum (CMM) power‐series expansion of the CP energy. The GBEC theory reduces in limiting cases to all five continuum (as opposed to “spin”) statistical theories of superconductivity, from BCS on one extreme to the BEC theory on the other, as well as to the BCS‐Bose “crossover” picture and the 1989 Friedberg‐Lee BEC theory. It accounts for 2e‐ and 2h‐CPs in arbitrary proportions while BCS theory can be deduced from the GBEC theory but allows only equal (50%‐50%) BE condensed‐mixtures of both kinds of CPs. As it yields the precise BCS gap equation for all temperatures as well as the precise BCS zero‐temperature condensation energy for all couplings, it suggests that the BCS condensate is a BE condensate of a ternary mixture of kinematically independent unpaired electrons coexisting with equally proportioned weakly‐bound zero‐CMM 2e‐ and 2h‐CPs. Without abandoning the electron‐phonon mechanism in moderately weak coupling, and fortuituously insensitive to the BF interactions, the GBEC theory suffices to reproduce the unusually high values of Tc (in units of the Fermi temperature TF) of 0.01–0.05 empirically found in the so‐called “exotic” superconductors of the Uemura plot, including cuprates, in contrast to the low values of Tc/TF⩽10−3 roughly reproduced by BCS theory for conventional (mostly elemental) superconductors.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

BEC-DRIVEN SUPERCONDUCTIVITY IN THE CUPRATES

M. Casas, Antonio Puente, A. Rigó +8 more

We apply to cuprates a three-fluid ideal boson-fermion statistical model of superconductivity in two dimensions (2D) derived from three extrema of the system Helmholtz free energy (subject to constant total fermion-number) for the BCS model interaction between fermions. The same interactions absent in BCS theory are neglected here. As the ensuing bosonic Cooper pairs move not in vacuum but in a Fermi sea we employ the correct linear — as opposed to the commonly-assumed quadratic — dispersion relation in the center-of-mass momentum (CMM). More importantly, pair breakup beyond a certain (very small) CMM is accounted for. Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) critical temperatures of about 800 K result for moderate coupling with cuprate parameters.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Dec 20, 1999•2 citations

Superconductor superfluid density from the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer/Bose crossover theory

Israel Chávez, M. Grether, MANUEL DE LLANO

Abstract The superfluid density $$n_{s}(T)$$ n s ( T ) of a superconductor is calculated based on the generalized Bose–Einstein condensation (GBEC) theory that addresses a fully-interacting ternary boson-fermion gas mixture of free electrons as fermions, plus two-electron Cooper pairs (2eCPs) and also, explicitly, two-hole Cooper pairs (2hCPs), both as bosons. Here we consider two special cases (i) 100%–0% (i.e., with no condensed 2hCPs) and (ii) 0%–100% (i.e., with no condensed 2eCPs). Subsumed in GBEC are the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) theories along with the BCS-BEC crossover theory extended with 2hCPs. We find that in the weak-coupling regime $$n_{s}(0)$$ n s ( 0 ) agrees with data from the Uemura et al. (2004) graph for several elemental SCs by taking in 3D with a quadratic energy-dispersion relation while in 2D with a linear relation are much too far below the data. In the strong-coupling regime the linear behavior of critical temperature $$T_{c}$$ T c vs $$n_{s}(0)$$ n s ( 0 ) obtained here is just as Božović et al. (2016) found. However, in 2D with a linear relation accounting for 0%–100%, $$n_{s}(T)/n_{s}(0)$$ n s ( T ) / n s ( 0 ) compares well with some high- $$T_{c}$$ T c -cuprate SC data between the two coupling regimes.

SN Applied Sciences•Jun 13, 2022•0 citations

Bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-Tc cuprates and other exotic systems

Dzhumanov, S.

Various BCS-like pairing theories are still invariably used to describe the unusual superconducting/superfluid states and properties of condensed matters without clarifying the fermionic or bosonic nature of Cooper pairs and the relevant mechanisms of superconductivity and superfluidity. We show that the bosonization of Cooper pairs and the novel superconductivity and superfluidity resulting from the condensation of an attractive Bose gas of Cooper pairs into a superfluid state in high-Tc cuprates and other exotic systems occur under the condition εF≲2εA (where εF is the Fermi energy, εA is the energy of the effective attraction between fermions). We argue that the simple BCS criterion (i.e. formation of an energy gap on the Fermi surface) is insufficient for the occurrence of unconventional superconductivity (superfluidity) and the superconducting/superfluid transition in attractive Bose systems is more λ-like than the usual Bose–Einstein condensation. The new and specific criteria for unconventional superconductivity and superfluidity are formulated. Mean-field theory of the three- and two-dimensional superfluid Bose condensates of Cooper pairs describes reasonably well the novel superconducting states (i.e., two distinct superconducting phases below the bulk superconducting transition temperature Tc and a vortex-like state above Tc) and properties (such as λ-like transition at Tc, first-order phase transition and gapless bosonic excitations somewhat below Tc or even far below Tc) of high-Tc cuprates in full agreement with the experimental findings. The unusual superconducting/superfluid states and properties of heavy-fermion and organic compounds, Sr2RuO4, 3He, 4He and atomic Fermi gases are explained more clearly by this theory.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR LINEARLY-DISPERSIVE COOPER PAIRS

MANUEL DE LLANO, J. J. Valencia

A recent Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) model of several cuprate superconductors is based on bosonic Cooper pairs (CPs) moving in 3D with a quadratic energy-momentum (dispersion) relation. The 3D BEC condensate-fraction versus temperature formula poorly fits penetration-depth data for two cuprates in the range 1/2<T/Tc≤1 where Tc is the BEC transition temperature. We show how these fits are dramatically improved, assuming cuprates to be quasi-2D, and how equally good fits are obtained for conventional 3D and quasi-1D nanotube superconducting data, provided the correct linear CP dispersion is assumed in BEC at their assumed corresponding dimensionalities. This is offered as additional concrete empirical evidence for linearly-dispersive pairs in another recent BEC scenario of superconductors within which a BCS condensate turns out to be a very special case.

arXiv:cond-mat/0602570•Modern Physics Letters B•Jul 30, 2006•4 citations
We show that the eigenvalues of the number operator [Formula: see text] in the pair state (k1, k2), where c's and c†'s are fermion operators, are limited to 0 or 1, while the eigenvalues of the pair-number operator with the net momentum q≡ k1+k2 fixed, [Formula: see text], are 0, 1, 2,…. Both fermionic and bosonic natures of the Cooper pairs (pairons) must be used in the superconductivity theory. The Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) of the pairons moving with a linear energy–momentum relation occurs at [Formula: see text] (3D), [Formula: see text] (2D), where n0 is the pairon density and v F the Fermi velocity. The connection between this [Formula: see text] and the BCS superconducting temperature is discussed.
Abstract The Cooper pair has the total spin S = 0. So, in accordance with the Pauli principle, the wave functions describing the Cooper pair system should have the boson permutation symmetry, but the pairon operators (Cooper's pair operators) do not obey the boson commutation relations. The pairon operators may not be considered neither as the Bose operators, nor as the Fermi operators. In this work, we analyze the statistical properties and the commutation relations for the pairon operator and reveal that they correspond to the modified parafermi statistics of rank p = 1. Two different expressions for the Cooper pair number operator are presented. We demonstrate that the calculations with a Hamiltonian expressed via pairon operators is more convenient using the commutation properties of these operators without presenting them as a product of fermion operators. This allows to study problems in which the interactions between Cooper's pair are also included. The problem of two interacting Cooper's pairs is discussed. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Unification of the Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (BCS) and the Bose‐Einstein condensation (BEC) theories is surveyed in terms of a generalized BEC (GBEC) finite‐temperature statistical formalism. A vital distinction is that Cooper pairs (CPs) are true bosons that may suffer a BEC since they obey BE statistics, in contrast with BCS pairs that are “hard‐core bosons” at best. A second crucial ingredient is the explicit presence of hole‐pairs (2h) alongside the usual electron‐pairs (2e). A third critical element (particularly in 2D where ordinary BEC does not occur) is the linear dispersion relation of CPs in leading order in the center‐of‐mass momentum (CMM) power‐series expansion of the CP energy. The GBEC theory reduces in limiting cases to all five continuum (as opposed to “spin”) statistical theories of superconductivity, from BCS on one extreme to the BEC theory on the other, as well as to the BCS‐Bose “crossover” picture and the 1989 Friedberg‐Lee BEC theory. It accounts for 2e‐ and 2h‐CPs in arbitrary proportions while BCS theory can be deduced from the GBEC theory but allows only equal (50%‐50%) BE condensed‐mixtures of both kinds of CPs. As it yields the precise BCS gap equation for all temperatures as well as the precise BCS zero‐temperature condensation energy for all couplings, it suggests that the BCS condensate is a BE condensate of a ternary mixture of kinematically independent unpaired electrons coexisting with equally proportioned weakly‐bound zero‐CMM 2e‐ and 2h‐CPs. Without abandoning the electron‐phonon mechanism in moderately weak coupling, and fortuituously insensitive to the BF interactions, the GBEC theory suffices to reproduce the unusually high values of Tc (in units of the Fermi temperature TF) of 0.01–0.05 empirically found in the so‐called “exotic” superconductors of the Uemura plot, including cuprates, in contrast to the low values of Tc/TF⩽10−3 roughly reproduced by BCS theory for conventional (mostly elemental) superconductors.
We apply to cuprates a three-fluid ideal boson-fermion statistical model of superconductivity in two dimensions (2D) derived from three extrema of the system Helmholtz free energy (subject to constant total fermion-number) for the BCS model interaction between fermions. The same interactions absent in BCS theory are neglected here. As the ensuing bosonic Cooper pairs move not in vacuum but in a Fermi sea we employ the correct linear — as opposed to the commonly-assumed quadratic — dispersion relation in the center-of-mass momentum (CMM). More importantly, pair breakup beyond a certain (very small) CMM is accounted for. Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) critical temperatures of about 800 K result for moderate coupling with cuprate parameters.
Abstract The superfluid density ns(T)n_{s}(T)ns​(T) n s ( T ) of a superconductor is calculated based on the generalized Bose–Einstein condensation (GBEC) theory that addresses a fully-interacting ternary boson-fermion gas mixture of free electrons as fermions, plus two-electron Cooper pairs (2eCPs) and also, explicitly, two-hole Cooper pairs (2hCPs), both as bosons. Here we consider two special cases (i) 100%–0% (i.e., with no condensed 2hCPs) and (ii) 0%–100% (i.e., with no condensed 2eCPs). Subsumed in GBEC are the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) theories along with the BCS-BEC crossover theory extended with 2hCPs. We find that in the weak-coupling regime ns(0)n_{s}(0)ns​(0) n s ( 0 ) agrees with data from the Uemura et al. (2004) graph for several elemental SCs by taking in 3D with a quadratic energy-dispersion relation while in 2D with a linear relation are much too far below the data. In the strong-coupling regime the linear behavior of critical temperature TcT_{c}Tc​ T c vs ns(0)n_{s}(0)ns​(0) n s ( 0 ) obtained here is just as Božović et al. (2016) found. However, in 2D with a linear relation accounting for 0%–100%, ns(T)/ns(0)n_{s}(T)/n_{s}(0)ns​(T)/ns​(0) n s ( T ) / n s ( 0 ) compares well with some high- TcT_{c}Tc​ T c -cuprate SC data between the two coupling regimes.
Various BCS-like pairing theories are still invariably used to describe the unusual superconducting/superfluid states and properties of condensed matters without clarifying the fermionic or bosonic nature of Cooper pairs and the relevant mechanisms of superconductivity and superfluidity. We show that the bosonization of Cooper pairs and the novel superconductivity and superfluidity resulting from the condensation of an attractive Bose gas of Cooper pairs into a superfluid state in high-Tc cuprates and other exotic systems occur under the condition εF≲2εA (where εF is the Fermi energy, εA is the energy of the effective attraction between fermions). We argue that the simple BCS criterion (i.e. formation of an energy gap on the Fermi surface) is insufficient for the occurrence of unconventional superconductivity (superfluidity) and the superconducting/superfluid transition in attractive Bose systems is more λ-like than the usual Bose–Einstein condensation. The new and specific criteria for unconventional superconductivity and superfluidity are formulated. Mean-field theory of the three- and two-dimensional superfluid Bose condensates of Cooper pairs describes reasonably well the novel superconducting states (i.e., two distinct superconducting phases below the bulk superconducting transition temperature Tc and a vortex-like state above Tc) and properties (such as λ-like transition at Tc, first-order phase transition and gapless bosonic excitations somewhat below Tc or even far below Tc) of high-Tc cuprates in full agreement with the experimental findings. The unusual superconducting/superfluid states and properties of heavy-fermion and organic compounds, Sr2RuO4, 3He, 4He and atomic Fermi gases are explained more clearly by this theory.
A recent Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) model of several cuprate superconductors is based on bosonic Cooper pairs (CPs) moving in 3D with a quadratic energy-momentum (dispersion) relation. The 3D BEC condensate-fraction versus temperature formula poorly fits penetration-depth data for two cuprates in the range 1/2<T/Tc≤1 where Tc is the BEC transition temperature. We show how these fits are dramatically improved, assuming cuprates to be quasi-2D, and how equally good fits are obtained for conventional 3D and quasi-1D nanotube superconducting data, provided the correct linear CP dispersion is assumed in BEC at their assumed corresponding dimensionalities. This is offered as additional concrete empirical evidence for linearly-dispersive pairs in another recent BEC scenario of superconductors within which a BCS condensate turns out to be a very special case.