An extension of Feynman's rule, relating probability amplitudes and probabilities in two-photon interferometry, has been proposed recently [G. Jaeger et al., Phys. Rev. A 48, 1023 (1993)]. It would be interesting to analyze the validity of this rule in other physical situations not considered by these authors. In particular, we show in this paper that the extended rule cannot be applied to the gedanken two-slit experiment. This result suggests the existence of two quantum regimes, differentiated by the validity of the generalized rule. The distinguishability of one particle and the visibilities of one-particle and two-particle interferences are calculated. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
An extension of Feynman's rule, relating probability amplitudes and probabilities in two-photon interferometry, has been proposed recently [G. Jaeger et al., Phys. Rev. A 48, 1023 (1993)]. It would be interesting to analyze the validity of this rule in other physical situations not considered by these authors. In particular, we show in this paper that the extended rule cannot be applied to the gedanken two-slit experiment. This result suggests the existence of two quantum regimes, differentiated by the validity of the generalized rule. The distinguishability of one particle and the visibilities of one-particle and two-particle interferences are calculated. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
Probability and interference According to Feynman, single-particle interference is ‘the only mystery’ of quantum theory (Feynman, Leighton and Sands 1965, ch. 1, p. 1). Feynman considered an experiment in which particles are fired, one at a time, towards a screen with two holes labelled 1 and 2. With both holes open, the distribution P 12 of particles at the backstop displays an oscillatory pattern of bright and dark fringes. If P 1 is the distribution with only hole 1 open, and P 2 is the distribution with only hole 2 open, then experimentally it is found that P 12 ≠ P 1 + P 2 . According to the argument given by Feynman (as well as by many other authors), this result is inexplicable by ‘classical’ reasoning. By his presentation of the two-slit experiment (as well as by his development of the path-integral formulation of quantum theory), Feynman popularised the idea that the usual probability calculus breaks down in the presence of quantum interference, where it is probability amplitudes (and not probabilities themselves) that are to be added. As pointed out by Koopman (1955), and by Ballentine (1986), this argument is mistaken: the probability distributions at the backstop – P 12 , P 1 and P 2 – are conditional probabilities with three distinct conditions (both slits open, one or other slit closed), and probability calculus does not imply any relationship between these. Feynman's argument notwithstanding, standard probability calculus is perfectly consistent with the two-slit experiment.
Identical two-particle interferometry provides a scenario where interference and exchange effects manifest at once. We present a detailed calculation of the detection patterns in the two-particle two-slit experiment by extending Feynman's Gaussian slit approach to multi-mode states. We show the existence of two regimes depending on the mode distributions. In one of them we find a novel behavior for bosons, with detection patterns almost equal to those of distinguishable particles although the overlapping is large. As a byproduct of our analysis we conclude that the interaction at the diffraction grating is an efficient method to increase the initial overlapping. We propose a scheme, within the reach of present day technology, to experimentally verify our results.
Classically, probability is considered in terms of the number of possible outcomes. For example, a die toss has six possible outcomes and a coin toss, two. Probability calculations make use of probabilities and hence of the total number of possible outcomes. Thus, they are not deterministic calculations which follow “what happens” as in Newtonian mechanics. We suggest that if free particle quantum mechanics is probabilistic, it must also involve the notion of possible outcomes in an experiment and not represent a deterministic approach. We suggest, however, that something interesting applies to quantum mechanics because we have suggested that free particle quantum mechanics arises from the Lorentz invariant A = -Et+px. We note that there exist x,t trajectory points which follow x=vt. We also note, however, that one may introduce the idea of intervals dx, dt (because Newton’s dx→0, dt→0 is an idealization) and that A is unchanged for x,t and x+hbar/p , t+hbar/E. In other words, we suggest that there are intervals with probability about each x,t trajectory point. A trajectory point is associated with deterministic physics, but probability about this point is not. In other words, one has a kind of hybrid probability scheme. Thus, exp(ipx) and exp(-iEt) really represent fluctuation probabilities about a trajectory point x and t. These ranges of possible x and t fluctuations about a trajectory point x,t allow for further probability to occur in certain interactions. We consider two examples. The first is 2-slit interference which involves a deterministic particle moving along a straight line towards a 2-slit mechanism perpendicular to its path. At the 2-slit apparatus, one considers a probabilistic calculation as the uncertainty in x, i.e. dx=hbar/p allows for possible interaction with both slits. This involves considering all possible outcomes (i.e. motion through one slit or the other which is a classical situation), but exp(i p dot r1) and exp(i p dot r2) “sit on top” of these trajectories at the 2-slit apparatus and one has interference of the probabilities linked with each classical possible outcome. Thus, there are two sets of probabilities which are intertwined, the probability range hbar/p for each path and the two possible paths which have equal probability. One must consider the possible outcomes for both sets together. We suggest that a similar analysis applies to the case of 1-D reflection-refraction for x=0 at an n1-n2 index of refraction junction. Thus, we suggest that a deterministic free particle with x=vt may encounter probabilistic interaction situations, such as a two-slit apparatus or an n1-n2 index of refraction junction. These are probabilistic only because there is a probability fluctuation scheme in x associated with each deterministic x point. It is this probability which allows for a second probability to arise due to interaction with the slits or at the 1-D n1-n2 junction. In such a case, one must consider all possible outcomes which means that one does not only consider the exp(ipx) type probabilities, but also those linked with the physical interaction, i.e. two possible paths, one from each slit, or an incident, reflected and refracted photon at x=0 (n1-n2 junction). It is a combination of all possible paths which must be used in calculations. We thus suggest that even though there is a sense of determinism, i..e free particles move as x=vt and these exist in the 2-slit case and the 1-D reflection-refraction case, in a probabilistic calculation one must consider all probabilistic outcomes consistent with these. Thus, quantum mechanical calculations are true probabilistic calculations in the sense that they involve all possible outcomes in an analysis.
In Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9, 3119 (1994), one of us (R.D.S) investigated a formulation of quantum mechanics as a generalized measure theory. Quantum mechanics computes probabilities from the absolute squares of complex amplitudes, and the resulting interference violates the (Kolmogorov) sum rule expressing the additivity of probabilities of mutually exclusive events. However, there is a higher order sum rule that quantum mechanics does obey, involving the probabilities of three mutually exclusive possibilities. We could imagine a yet more general theory by assuming that it violates the next higher sum rule. In this paper, we report results from an ongoing experiment that sets out to test the validity of this second sum rule by measuring the interference patterns produced by three slits and all the possible combinations of those slits being open or closed. We use attenuated laser light combined with single photon counting to confirm the particle character of the measured light.
We start with the discussion on misapplication of classical probability theory by Feynman in his analysis of the two slit experiment (by following the critical argumentation of Koopman, Ballentine, and the author of this paper). The seed of Feynman's conclusion on the impossibility to apply the classical probabilistic description for the two slit experiment is treatment of conditional probabilities corresponding to different experimental contexts as unconditional ones. Then we move to the Bell type inequalities. Bell applied classical probability theory in the same manner as Feynman and, as can be expected, he also obtained the impossibility statement. In contrast to Feynman, he formulated his no-go statement not in the probabilistic terms, but by appealing to nonlocality. This note can be considered as a part of the author's attempts for getting rid off nonlocality from quantum physics.
This paper is based on work published in [1]. It describes a triple slit experiment using single photons that has been used to provide a bound on one of the most fundamental axioms of quantum mechanics i.e. Born’s rule for probabilities [2]. In spite of being one of the most successful theories which describes various natural phenomena, quantum mechanics has enough intricacies and “weirdness” associated with it which makes many physicists believe that it may not be the final theory and hints towards the possibility of more generalized versions. Quantum interference as shown by a double slit diffraction experiment only occurs from pairs of paths. Even in multi‐slit versions, interference can only occur between pairs of possibilities and increasing the number of slits does not increase the complexity of the theory that still remains second‐order. However, more generalized versions of quantum mechanics may allow for multi‐path i.e. higher than second order interference. This experiment also provides a bound on the magnitude of such higher order interference. We have been able to bound the magnitude of three‐path interference to less than 10−2 of the expected two‐path interference, thus ruling out third and higher order interference and providing a bound on the accuracy of Born’s rule.