Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical Computer Science

Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey

Harry Buhrman, Ronald de Wolf

Published Oct 1, 2002• 666 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0304-3975(01)00144-x

Related papers

Randomized decision tree complexity of Deutsch–Jozsa problem and a generalization

Guoliang Xu, Daowen Qiu, Binbin Zhang +2 more

Quantum Information Processing•Feb 26, 2024•1 citation

Optimal direct sum results for deterministic and randomized decision tree complexity

Rahul Jain, Hartmut Klauck, Miklós Sántha

arXiv:1004.0105•Information Processing Letters•Jul 24, 2010•22 citations

Lower bounds on quantum query complexity for decision trees

Hideaki Fukuhara, Eiji Takimoto

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Oct 3, 2008•0 citations

Entropy lower bounds for quantum decision tree complexity

Yaoyun Shi

Information Processing Letters•Jan 1, 2002•10 citations

Monotone measures of statistical complexity

Łukasz Rudnicki, I. V. Toranzo, Pablo Sánchez-Moreno +1 more

arXiv:1510.01547•Physics Letters A•Oct 30, 2015•66 citations

Lower bounds on quantum query complexity for read-once decision trees with parity nodes

Hideaki Fukuhara, Eiji Takimoto

We introduce a complexity measure for decision trees called the soft rank, which measures how well-balanced a given tree is. The soft rank is a somehow relaxed variant of the rank. Among all decision trees of depth d, the complete binary decision tree (the most balanced tree) has maximum soft rank d, the decision list (the most unbalanced tree) has minimum soft rank √d, and any other trees have soft rank between √d and d. We show that, for any decision tree T in some class G of decision trees which includes all read-once decision trees, the soft rank of T is a lower bound on the quantum query complexity of the Boolean function that T represents. This implies that for any Boolean function f that is represented by a decision tree in G, the deterministic query complexity of f is only quadratically larger than the quantum query complexity of f.

Computing: The Australasian Theory Symposium•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations
We introduce a complexity measure for decision trees called the soft rank, which measures how well-balanced a given tree is. The soft rank is a somehow relaxed variant of the rank. Among all decision trees of depth d, the complete binary decision tree (the most balanced tree) has maximum soft rank d, the decision list (the most unbalanced tree) has minimum soft rank √d, and any other trees have soft rank between √d and d. We show that, for any decision tree T in some class G of decision trees which includes all read-once decision trees, the soft rank of T is a lower bound on the quantum query complexity of the Boolean function that T represents. This implies that for any Boolean function f that is represented by a decision tree in G, the deterministic query complexity of f is only quadratically larger than the quantum query complexity of f.