Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Information Processing Letters

Entropy lower bounds for quantum decision tree complexity

Yaoyun Shi

Published Jan 1, 2002• 10 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0020-0190(01)00191-0

Related papers

Lower bounds on quantum query complexity for decision trees

Hideaki Fukuhara, Eiji Takimoto

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Oct 3, 2008•0 citations

Entropy lower bounds of quantum decision tree complexity

Yaoyun Shi

We prove a general lower bound of quantum decision tree complexity in terms of some entropy notion. We regard the computation as a communication process in which the oracle and the computer exchange several rounds of messages, each round consisting of O(log(n)) bits. Let E(f) be the Shannon entropy of the random variable f(X), where X is uniformly random in f's domain. Our main result is that it takes Ω(E(f)) queries to compute any \emph{total} function f. It is interesting to contrast this bound with the Ω(E(f)/log(n)) bound, which is tight for \emph{partial} functions. Our approach is the polynomial method.

arXiv:quant-ph/0008095•Aug 23, 2000•0 citations

Quantum lower bounds by entropy numbers

Stefan Heinrich

arXiv:quant-ph/0611294•Journal of Complexity•Mar 14, 2007•9 citations

Separating Decision Tree Complexity from Subcube Partition Complexity

Robin Kothari, David Racicot-Desloges, Miklós Sántha

The subcube partition model of computation is at least as powerful as decision trees but no separation between these models was known. We show that there exists a function whose deterministic subcube partition complexity is asymptotically smaller than its randomized decision tree complexity, resolving an open problem of Friedgut, Kahn, and Wigderson (2002). Our lower bound is based on the information-theoretic techniques first introduced to lower bound the randomized decision tree complexity of the recursive majority function. We also show that the public-coin partition bound, the best known lower bound method for randomized decision tree complexity subsuming other general techniques such as block sensitivity, approximate degree, randomized certificate complexity, and the classical adversary bound, also lower bounds randomized subcube partition complexity. This shows that all these lower bound techniques cannot prove optimal lower bounds for randomized decision tree complexity, which answers an open question of Jain and Klauck (2010) and Jain, Lee, and Vishnoi (2014).

arXiv:1504.01339•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2015•4 citations

Entropy and algorithmic complexity in quantum information theory

Fabio Benatti

Natural Computing•Dec 7, 2006•8 citations

Lower bounds on quantum query complexity for read-once decision trees with parity nodes

Hideaki Fukuhara, Eiji Takimoto

We introduce a complexity measure for decision trees called the soft rank, which measures how well-balanced a given tree is. The soft rank is a somehow relaxed variant of the rank. Among all decision trees of depth d, the complete binary decision tree (the most balanced tree) has maximum soft rank d, the decision list (the most unbalanced tree) has minimum soft rank √d, and any other trees have soft rank between √d and d. We show that, for any decision tree T in some class G of decision trees which includes all read-once decision trees, the soft rank of T is a lower bound on the quantum query complexity of the Boolean function that T represents. This implies that for any Boolean function f that is represented by a decision tree in G, the deterministic query complexity of f is only quadratically larger than the quantum query complexity of f.

Computing: The Australasian Theory Symposium•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations
We prove a general lower bound of quantum decision tree complexity in terms of some entropy notion. We regard the computation as a communication process in which the oracle and the computer exchange several rounds of messages, each round consisting of O(log(n)) bits. Let E(f) be the Shannon entropy of the random variable f(X), where X is uniformly random in f's domain. Our main result is that it takes Ω(E(f)) queries to compute any \emph{total} function f. It is interesting to contrast this bound with the Ω(E(f)/log(n)) bound, which is tight for \emph{partial} functions. Our approach is the polynomial method.
The subcube partition model of computation is at least as powerful as decision trees but no separation between these models was known. We show that there exists a function whose deterministic subcube partition complexity is asymptotically smaller than its randomized decision tree complexity, resolving an open problem of Friedgut, Kahn, and Wigderson (2002). Our lower bound is based on the information-theoretic techniques first introduced to lower bound the randomized decision tree complexity of the recursive majority function. We also show that the public-coin partition bound, the best known lower bound method for randomized decision tree complexity subsuming other general techniques such as block sensitivity, approximate degree, randomized certificate complexity, and the classical adversary bound, also lower bounds randomized subcube partition complexity. This shows that all these lower bound techniques cannot prove optimal lower bounds for randomized decision tree complexity, which answers an open question of Jain and Klauck (2010) and Jain, Lee, and Vishnoi (2014).
We introduce a complexity measure for decision trees called the soft rank, which measures how well-balanced a given tree is. The soft rank is a somehow relaxed variant of the rank. Among all decision trees of depth d, the complete binary decision tree (the most balanced tree) has maximum soft rank d, the decision list (the most unbalanced tree) has minimum soft rank √d, and any other trees have soft rank between √d and d. We show that, for any decision tree T in some class G of decision trees which includes all read-once decision trees, the soft rank of T is a lower bound on the quantum query complexity of the Boolean function that T represents. This implies that for any Boolean function f that is represented by a decision tree in G, the deterministic query complexity of f is only quadratically larger than the quantum query complexity of f.