Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Russian Microelectronics

New method for improving quantum-algorithm reliability

Коноплев Борис Георгиевич, A. V. Kovalev, В. В. Кальсков

Published Mar 1, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A new method is proposed of reducing probability of error for quantum algorithms subject to physical constraints. It essentially involves preparation of qubits for computation. The method is tested on a part of a quantum algorithm employing the quantum gates NOT, SWAP, CNOT, CCNOT, and CSWAP.
DOI
10.1134/s1063739707020102

Related papers

Reducing the CNOT count for Clifford+T circuits on NISQ architectures

Priyanka Mukhopadhyay, Vlad Gheorghiu, Jiaxin Huang +2 more

While mapping a quantum circuit to the physical layer one has to consider the numerous constraints imposed by the underlying hardware architecture. Connectivity of the physical qubits is one such constraint that restricts two-qubit operations, such as CNOT, to ``connected'' qubits. SWAP gates can be used to place the logical qubits on admissible physical qubits, but they entail a significant increase in CNOT-count. In this paper we consider the problem of reducing the CNOT-count in Clifford+T circuits on connectivity constrained architectures, like noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices. We ``slice'' the circuit at the position of Hadamard gates and ``build'' the intermediate {CNOT,T} sub-circuits using Steiner trees, significantly improving on previous methods. We compared the performance of our algorithms while mapping different benchmark and random circuits to some well-known architectures such as 9-qubit square grid, 16-qubit square grid, Rigetti 16-qubit Aspen, 16-qubit IBM QX5 and 20-qubit IBM Tokyo. Our methods give less CNOT-count compared to Qiskit transpiler as well as using SWAP gates. Assuming most of the errors in a NISQ circuit implementation are due to CNOT errors, then our method would allow circuits with few times more CNOT gates be reliably implemented than the previous methods would permit.

•May 16, 2022•2 citations

Dilemma between Quantum Speedup and Computational Reliability--Overcoming Errors with Efficient Verification Methods for Quantum Computing

Yuki Takeuchi, Seiichiro Tani

Quantum computers are expected to solve several problems faster than any classical computer.However, they may sometimes output incorrect answers because they are prone to errors.Therefore, to develop reliable quantum computers, it is essential to develop methods of verifying whether the outputs of quantum computers are correct.In this article, we introduce our recent research results on our verification methods.

NTT technical review•Oct 1, 2023•2 citations

Practical Quantum Error Mitigation for Near-Future Applications

Suguru Endo, Simon C. Benjamin, Ying Li

A new analysis of quantum error mitigation, which attempts to limit the effects of errors in near-term quantum computers, shows that two proposed techniques can work in small systems without the need for extra qubits or peripheral devices.

arXiv:1712.09271•Physical Review X•Jul 26, 2018•562 citations

Reducing the CNOT count for Clifford+T circuits on NISQ architectures

Priyanka Mukhopadhyay, Vlad Gheorghiu, Jiaxin Huang +2 more

While mapping a quantum circuit to the physical layer one has to consider the numerous constraints imposed by the underlying hardware architecture. Connectivity of the physical qubits is one such constraint that restricts two-qubit operations, such as CNOT, to “connected’‘ qubits. SWAP gates can be used to place the logical qubits on admissible physical qubits, but they entail a significant increase in CNOT-count. In this paper we consider the problem of reducing the CNOT-count in Clifford+T circuits on connectivity constrained architectures, like noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices. We “slice’‘ the circuit at the position of Hadamard gates and “build” the intermediate {CNOT,T} sub-circuits using Steiner trees, significantly improving on previous methods. We compared the performance of our algorithms while mapping different benchmark and random circuits to some well-known architectures such as 9-qubit square grid, 16-qubit square grid, Rigetti 16-qubit Aspen, 16-qubit IBM QX5 and 20-qubit IBM Tokyo. Our methods give less CNOT-count compared to Qiskit transpiler as well as using SWAP gates. Assuming most of the errors in a NISQ circuit implementation are due to CNOT errors, then our method would allow circuits with few times more CNOT gates be reliably implemented than the previous methods would permit.

•May 16, 2022•5 citations

Reducing the CNOT Count for Clifford+T Circuits on NISQ Architectures

Vlad Gheorghiu, Jiaxin Huang, Sarah Meng Li +2 more

While mapping a quantum circuit to the physical layer one has to consider the numerous constraints imposed by the underlying hardware architecture. Connectivity of the physical qubits is one such constraint that restricts two-qubit operations, such as CNOT, to “connected” qubits. SWAP gates can be used to place the logical qubits on admissible physical qubits, but they entail a significant increase in CNOT-count. In this article, we consider the problem of reducing the CNOT-count in Clifford+T circuits on connectivity-constrained architectures, like noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices. We “slice” the circuit at the position of Hadamard gates and “build” the intermediate$\{\text {CNOT},{T}\}$subcircuits using Steiner trees, significantly improving on previous methods. We compared the performance of our algorithms while mapping different benchmark and random circuits to some well-known architectures, such as 9-qubit square grid, 16-qubit square grid, Rigetti 16-qubit Aspen, 16-qubit IBM QX5, and 20-qubit IBM Tokyo. Our methods give less CNOT-count compared to Qiskit and TKET transpiler as well as using SWAP gates. Assuming most of the errors in an NISQ circuit implementation are due to CNOT errors, then our method would allow circuits with a few times more CNOT gates be reliably implemented than the previous methods would permit.

arXiv:2011.12191•IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems•Oct 10, 2022•31 citations

Single-Shot Fault-Tolerant Quantum Error Correction

Héctor Bombín

The goal of achieving quantum computation requires overcoming the limitation of quantum noise. A new approach shows how noisy local information about noise can be used to reliably correct errors for an ensemble of qubits on a lattice.

arXiv:1404.5504•Physical Review X•Sep 28, 2015•164 citations
While mapping a quantum circuit to the physical layer one has to consider the numerous constraints imposed by the underlying hardware architecture. Connectivity of the physical qubits is one such constraint that restricts two-qubit operations, such as CNOT, to ``connected'' qubits. SWAP gates can be used to place the logical qubits on admissible physical qubits, but they entail a significant increase in CNOT-count. In this paper we consider the problem of reducing the CNOT-count in Clifford+T circuits on connectivity constrained architectures, like noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices. We ``slice'' the circuit at the position of Hadamard gates and ``build'' the intermediate {CNOT,T} sub-circuits using Steiner trees, significantly improving on previous methods. We compared the performance of our algorithms while mapping different benchmark and random circuits to some well-known architectures such as 9-qubit square grid, 16-qubit square grid, Rigetti 16-qubit Aspen, 16-qubit IBM QX5 and 20-qubit IBM Tokyo. Our methods give less CNOT-count compared to Qiskit transpiler as well as using SWAP gates. Assuming most of the errors in a NISQ circuit implementation are due to CNOT errors, then our method would allow circuits with few times more CNOT gates be reliably implemented than the previous methods would permit.
While mapping a quantum circuit to the physical layer one has to consider the numerous constraints imposed by the underlying hardware architecture. Connectivity of the physical qubits is one such constraint that restricts two-qubit operations, such as CNOT, to “connected’‘ qubits. SWAP gates can be used to place the logical qubits on admissible physical qubits, but they entail a significant increase in CNOT-count. In this paper we consider the problem of reducing the CNOT-count in Clifford+T circuits on connectivity constrained architectures, like noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices. We “slice’‘ the circuit at the position of Hadamard gates and “build” the intermediate {CNOT,T} sub-circuits using Steiner trees, significantly improving on previous methods. We compared the performance of our algorithms while mapping different benchmark and random circuits to some well-known architectures such as 9-qubit square grid, 16-qubit square grid, Rigetti 16-qubit Aspen, 16-qubit IBM QX5 and 20-qubit IBM Tokyo. Our methods give less CNOT-count compared to Qiskit transpiler as well as using SWAP gates. Assuming most of the errors in a NISQ circuit implementation are due to CNOT errors, then our method would allow circuits with few times more CNOT gates be reliably implemented than the previous methods would permit.
While mapping a quantum circuit to the physical layer one has to consider the numerous constraints imposed by the underlying hardware architecture. Connectivity of the physical qubits is one such constraint that restricts two-qubit operations, such as CNOT, to “connected” qubits. SWAP gates can be used to place the logical qubits on admissible physical qubits, but they entail a significant increase in CNOT-count. In this article, we consider the problem of reducing the CNOT-count in Clifford+T circuits on connectivity-constrained architectures, like noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing devices. We “slice” the circuit at the position of Hadamard gates and “build” the intermediate{CNOT,T}\{\text {CNOT},{T}\}{CNOT,T}subcircuits using Steiner trees, significantly improving on previous methods. We compared the performance of our algorithms while mapping different benchmark and random circuits to some well-known architectures, such as 9-qubit square grid, 16-qubit square grid, Rigetti 16-qubit Aspen, 16-qubit IBM QX5, and 20-qubit IBM Tokyo. Our methods give less CNOT-count compared to Qiskit and TKET transpiler as well as using SWAP gates. Assuming most of the errors in an NISQ circuit implementation are due to CNOT errors, then our method would allow circuits with a few times more CNOT gates be reliably implemented than the previous methods would permit.