The fulfillment in quantum electrodynamics of the principle of relativistic causality—the signal velocity does not exceed the velocity of light—is discussed. In Sec. 1 it is argued that this principle is not guaranteed automatically merely by the local commutativity of the theory. Section 2 is a critical review of the signal transmission problems which have been formulated and solved in the literature. In Sec. 3, this problem is considered in the framework of a simple but fairly realistic model of quantum electrodynamics. The signal source is an external current localized in some region S. The arrival of a signal in a region D at a distance R is established by a change in the coordinate, momentum, or energy of a charged particle. It is shown that proof of relativistic causality of the theory requires one to take into account appropriately quantum-mechanical and, in particular, quantum-electrodynamical features of the problem. In the final fourth section, a general formulation and exact solution of the signal transmission problem are given. The treatment is of sufficient generality for one to be able to assert that in the framework of quantum electrodynamics none of the possible methods of signal transmission violate relativistic causality.
The fulfillment in quantum electrodynamics of the principle of relativistic causality—the signal velocity does not exceed the velocity of light—is discussed. In Sec. 1 it is argued that this principle is not guaranteed automatically merely by the local commutativity of the theory. Section 2 is a critical review of the signal transmission problems which have been formulated and solved in the literature. In Sec. 3, this problem is considered in the framework of a simple but fairly realistic model of quantum electrodynamics. The signal source is an external current localized in some region S. The arrival of a signal in a region D at a distance R is established by a change in the coordinate, momentum, or energy of a charged particle. It is shown that proof of relativistic causality of the theory requires one to take into account appropriately quantum-mechanical and, in particular, quantum-electrodynamical features of the problem. In the final fourth section, a general formulation and exact solution of the signal transmission problem are given. The treatment is of sufficient generality for one to be able to assert that in the framework of quantum electrodynamics none of the possible methods of signal transmission violate relativistic causality.
Causality, in the sense of finiteness of the velocity of propagation of signals, is discussed for quantum electrodynamics. The paper proposes an appropriate quantum-mechanical criterion for causality. According to this criterion local observables like the field strengths E(x), H(x) and the current density j/sub ..mu../(x) behave causally. However, the theory contains quantities (like the electron number density) which exhibit macroscopic acausality. The reason for this result is discussed in a theory where the usual causality condition, i.e., local commutativity of the operators A/sub ..mu../ and psi, is satisfied. (AIP)
The notion of Einstein causality, i.e. the limiting role of the velocity of light in the transmission of signals, is discussed. It is pointed out that Nimtz and coworkers use the notion of signal velocity in a different sense from Einstein and that their experimental results are in full agreement with Einstein causality in its ordinary sense. We also show that under quite general assumptions instantaneous spreading of particle localization occurs in quantum theory, relativistic or not, with fields or without. We discuss if this affects Einstein causality.
The notion of Einstein causality, i.e. the limiting role of the velocity of light in the transmission of signals, is discussed. We show that under quite general assumptions instantaneous spreading of particle localization occurs in quantum theory, relativistic or not, with fields or without. We discuss if this affects Einstein causality. It is also pointed out that the controversy about recent experiments of Nimtz and coworkers reporting superluminal signal velocities in micro-wave tunneling arise from an indiscriminate use of terminology and that the experimental results are in full agreement with Einstein causality in its ordinary sense.
Abstract The new quantum theory, based on the assumption that the dynamical variables do not obey the commutative law of multiplication, has by now been developed sufficiently to form a fairly complete theory of dynamics. One can treat mathematically the problem of any dynamical system composed of a number of particles with instantaneous forces acting between them, provided it is describable by a Hamiltonian function, and one can interpret the mathematics physically by a quite definite general method. On the other hand, hardly anything has been done up to the present on quantum electrodynamics. The questions of the correct treatment of a system in which the forces are propagated with the velocity of light instead of instantaneously, of the production of an electromagnetic field by a moving electron, and of the reaction of this field on the electron have not yet been touched. In addition, there is a serious difficulty in making the theory satisfy all the requirements of the restricted principle of relativity, since a Hamiltonian function can no longer be used. This relativity question is, of course, connected with the previous ones, and it will be impossible to answer any one question completely without at the same time answering them all. However, it appears to be possible to build up a fairly satisfactory theory of the emission of radiation and of the reaction of the radiation field on the emitting system on the basis of a kinematics and dynamics which are not strictly relativistic. This is the main object of the present paper. The theory is noil-relativistic only on account of the time being counted throughout as a c-number, instead of being treated symmetrically with the space co-ordinates. The relativity variation of mass with velocity is taken into account without difficulty. The underlying ideas of the theory are very simple. Consider an atom interacting with a field of radiation, which we may suppose for definiteness to be confined in an enclosure so as to have only a discrete set of degrees of freedom. Resolving the radiation into its Fourier components, we can consider the energy and phase of each of the components to be dynamical variables describing the radiation field. Thus if Er is the energy of a component labelled r and θr is the corresponding phase (defined as the time since the wave was in a standard phase), we can suppose each Er and θr to form a pair of canonically conjugate variables. In the absence of any interaction between the field and the atom, the whole system of field plus atom will be describable by the Hamiltonian H ═ ΣrEr + Ho equal to the total energy, Ho being the Hamiltonian for the atom alone, since the variables Er, θr obviously satisfy their canonical equations of motion Er ═ — ∂H/∂θr ═ 0, θr ═ ∂H/∂Er ═ 1.
We investigate whether commutativity is necessary to represent relativistic locality for localization observables of relativistic quantum systems in Minkowski spacetime. A well known no-go theorem by Halvorson and Clifton shows that commutativity of localization effects for causally separated regions is incompatible with other seemingly natural assumptions about spatial localization. Since commutativity is taken to represent locality in the Araki-Haag-Kastler framework of QFT, this prompts the question whether it follows from more elementary locality principles of quantum theory. Using Busch's operational analysis in terms of no-signaling and relativistic consistency, we argue that for particle-like systems commutativity is not implied by these principles. Assuming a natural local detectability principle, elementary localization observables are not localized in arbitrarily small spacetime neighborhoods of the relevant spatial regions, but rather in regions containing the entire rest space (a Cauchy surface) on which the measurement is performed. This reflects the particle picture itself, where localization occurs at a unique place on a rest space filled with ideal detectors, and therefore does not directly conflict with the Araki-Haag-Kastler notion of locality. We also show that commutativity and localization can coexist for less idealized localization procedures. To this end, we introduce conditional localization POVMs associated with bounded spatial regions interpreted as laboratories. By the gentle measurement lemma, these observables describe conditional localization probabilities and can, in principle, satisfy commutativity for causally separated laboratories. They may therefore be represented by local observables in the Araki-Haag-Kastler sense. Explicit examples are presented in a second work within local QFT.
This paper surveys the issue of relativistic causality within the framework of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). In doing so, we distinguish various notions of causality formulated in the literature and study their relationships, and thereby we offer what we hope to be a useful taxonomy. We propose that the most direct expression of relativistic causality in AQFT is captured not (as has sometimes been claimed) by the spectrum condition but rather by the axiom of local primitive causality, in that it entails a form of local determinism for quantum fields which generalizes the constraint of no superluminal propagation of classical field theories to relativistic quantum field theory. We discuss the status of the axiom of micro-causality by locating its place within a large family of separability/independence/locality conditions developed for AQFT and also by relating it to so-called no-signalling theorems. And we also provide a critical survey of attempts to understand the implications for relativistic causality of the distant correlations endemic to the states in models of AQFT satisfying the standard axioms, and we provide an assessment of attempts to employ Reichenbach's common cause principle in AQFT to defuse worries that these distant correlations implicate direct causal connections between relatively spacelike events.