Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids

FINDING PHASE SEPARATION IN THE t–J MODEL NUMERICALLY

C. Stephen Hellberg, Efstratios Manousakis

Published Oct 1, 1998• 6 citations

Publisher

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3697(98)00113-9

Related papers

Phase separation in the two-dimensional t–J model

C. T. Shih, Y. C. Chen, T. K. Lee

Physica C SuperconductivityNov 1, 20010 citations

STUDY OF PHASE SEPARATION IN THE HUBBARD MODEL1

Adriana Moreo

We study the behavior of the mean number of particles <n> as a function of the chemical potential μ in the two dimensional Hubbard model with both attractive and repulsive interaction, using a quantum Monte Carlo method. Working at U/t=10, 4 and −4 on lattices with 4×4, 6×6 and 8×8 sites, we do not find evidence of phase separation.

International Journal of Modern Physics BJan 1, 19910 citations

Phase Separation in a t - J Model

Michael P Marder, N. Papanicolaou, G. C. Psaltakis

NATO ASI series. Series B : PhysicsJan 1, 199113 citations

PHASE SEPARATION OF ATOMS IN OPTICAL LATTICES

Hai-Qing Lin

Conference in Honor of C N Yang's 85th BirthdayDec 1, 20080 citations

Phase separation and flux phases in the t−J model

Alexander A. Gorbatsevich, S.V. Zaykov

Physica C SuperconductivityDec 1, 19940 citations

KINETIC ENERGY AND PHASE SEPARATION IN A DOPED ANTIFERROMAGNET

Xin Xu, Yun Song, Shiping Feng

The ground-state kinetic energy of the t-J model is studied within the mean field approximation by using the fermion-spin transformation, the results show that the mean field ground-state kinetic energy is close to the numerical result at under dopings, and roughly consistent with the numerical result at optimal dopings. It is also shown that the frustration term J′ is favourable to diminish the range of the phase seperation in the t-J model.

Modern Physics Letters BOct 20, 19952 citations