Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

Diffraction in Time

M. Moshińsky

Published Nov 1, 1952• 315 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In a previous note a dynamical description of resonance scattering was given, and transient terms appeared in the wave function describing the process. To understand the physical significance of these terms, the transient effects that appear when a shutter is opened are discussed in this paper. For a nonrelativistic beam of particles, the transient current has a close mathematical resemblance with the intensity of light in the Fresnel diffraction by a straight edge. This is the reason for calling the transient phenomena by the name of diffraction in time.The shutter problem is discussed for particles whose wave functions satisfy the Schr\"odinger equation, the ordinary wave equation, and the Klein-Gordon equation. Only for the Schr\"odinger time-dependent equation do the transient wave functions resemble the solutions that appear in Sommerfeld's theory of diffraction. The connection of transient phenomena with the time-energy uncertainty relation, and the interpretation of the transient current in a scattering process, are briefly discussed. The relativistic wave functions for the shutter problem may play an important role in the dynamical description of a relativistic scattering process.

DOI
10.1103/physrev.88.625

Related papers

A Basis for Causal Scattering Waves, Relativistic Diffraction in Time Functions

Salvador Godoy, Karen Villa

Relativistic diffraction in time wave functions can be used as a basis for causal scattering waves. We derive such exact wave function for a beam of Dirac and Klein-Gordon particles. The transient Dirac spinors are expressed in terms of integral defined functions which are the relativistic equivalent of the Fresnel integrals. When plotted versus time the exact relativistic densities show transient oscillations which resemble a diffraction pattern. The Dirac and Klein-Gordon time oscillations look different, hence relativistic diffraction in time depends strongly on the particle spin.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2016•9 citations

Transient Quantum Beat Oscillations in Extreme-Relativistic Diffraction in Time

Salvador Godoy

In the solution of the Klein-Gordon equation for the shutter problem, we prove that, at internuclear distances, a relativistic beam of Pi-mesons has a probability density which oscillates in time in a similar way to the spatial dependence in optical Fresnel diffraction from a straight edge. However, for an extreme-relativistic beam, the Fresnel oscillations turn into quantum damped beat oscillations. We prove that quantum beat oscillations are the consequence, at extreme-relativistic velocities, of the interference between the initial incident wave function, and the Green’s function in the relativistic shutter problem. This is a pure quantum relativistic phenomenon.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2021•1 citation

Diffraction in time and the time–energy uncertainty relation

M. Moshińsky

The purpose of this paper is to discuss two forms in which the time–energy uncertainty relation can appear. One of them concerns the time of preparation of a given state and the other the lifetime of compound systems. Both will be illustrated here through exactly solvable examples. The first one will be the opening and subsequent closing of a shutter on which we have an incident beam of particles. This problem shows a diffraction-in-time effect closely connected with the first type of time–energy uncertainty relation. The second will be the decay of a compound state described through a schematic R matrix formalism. There one can clearly see the transition between the time–energy uncertainty relation as associated with the interval in which the decay process has been in operation, and as associated with the lifetime of the compound state.

American Journal of Physics•Nov 1, 1976•61 citations

Transient effects in two channel interactions and an application to the behavior of a time dependent shutter

Tobias Kramer, M. Moshińsky

The subject of transient effects in quantum mechanics has been of interest to one of the authors (MM) since long before it became possible to study them experimentally. In particular, the problem of opening a shutter instantaneously led him to the concept of diffraction in time [1]. Physically, it is only possible to open a shutter as a function of time and this complicates the problem greatly, as it is then not invariant under time translations and thus, among other difficulties, the energy of the system is not a constant of the motion. Kleber and Scheitler [2] analyzed the problem describing the shutter as a ±¡function potential at the origin x = 0, but whose strength was an inverse function of time. In this paper, we follow another procedure by adding to our initial two particle channel another one, and make them interact through appropriate time independent boundary conditions at the point of coincidence. The full problem conserves the total energy, but this does not happen if we restrict ourselves to a description in the first channel only. Thus, we have a rough but analytically solvable problem using a Laplace transform, which mimics some aspects of a time-dependent shutter, and compare our results with some of those derived by the different procedure of reference [2].

•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Diffraction in time in terms of Wigner distributions and tomographic probabilities

Vladimir I. Man’ko, M. Moshińsky, Anju Sharma

Long ago in quantum mechanics a discussion appeared about the problem of opening a completely absorbing shutter on which a stream of particles of definite velocity was impinged. The solution of the problem was obtained in a form entirely analogous to the optical one of diffraction by a straight edge. The argument of the Fresnel integrals was time dependent, and thus the first part in the title of this paper. In this paper we reformulate the problem in Wigner distributions and tomographical probabilities. In the former case the probability in phase space is very simple but, as it takes positive and negative values, the interpretation is ambiguous, though it gives a classical limit that agrees entirely with our intuition. In the latter case we can start with our initial conditions in a given reference frame, but obtain our final solution in an arbitrary frame of reference.

arXiv:quant-ph/9902075•Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1999•54 citations

Dirac Quantum Beats in Extreme Relativistic Diffraction in Time

Salvador Godoy

We solve the relativistic Dirac equation for the shutter problem. We prove that, at intermediate relativistic energies, the probability density oscillates in time in a similar way to the optical Fresnel oscillations in a straight edge. However, for extreme-relativistic beams, the Fresnel oscillations turn into quantum damped beats.

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics•Jan 1, 2022•2 citations
In a previous note a dynamical description of resonance scattering was given, and transient terms appeared in the wave function describing the process. To understand the physical significance of these terms, the transient effects that appear when a shutter is opened are discussed in this paper. For a nonrelativistic beam of particles, the transient current has a close mathematical resemblance with the intensity of light in the Fresnel diffraction by a straight edge. This is the reason for calling the transient phenomena by the name of diffraction in time.The shutter problem is discussed for particles whose wave functions satisfy the Schr"odinger equation, the ordinary wave equation, and the Klein-Gordon equation. Only for the Schr"odinger time-dependent equation do the transient wave functions resemble the solutions that appear in Sommerfeld's theory of diffraction. The connection of transient phenomena with the time-energy uncertainty relation, and the interpretation of the transient current in a scattering process, are briefly discussed. The relativistic wave functions for the shutter problem may play an important role in the dynamical description of a relativistic scattering process.
Relativistic diffraction in time wave functions can be used as a basis for causal scattering waves. We derive such exact wave function for a beam of Dirac and Klein-Gordon particles. The transient Dirac spinors are expressed in terms of integral defined functions which are the relativistic equivalent of the Fresnel integrals. When plotted versus time the exact relativistic densities show transient oscillations which resemble a diffraction pattern. The Dirac and Klein-Gordon time oscillations look different, hence relativistic diffraction in time depends strongly on the particle spin.
In the solution of the Klein-Gordon equation for the shutter problem, we prove that, at internuclear distances, a relativistic beam of Pi-mesons has a probability density which oscillates in time in a similar way to the spatial dependence in optical Fresnel diffraction from a straight edge. However, for an extreme-relativistic beam, the Fresnel oscillations turn into quantum damped beat oscillations. We prove that quantum beat oscillations are the consequence, at extreme-relativistic velocities, of the interference between the initial incident wave function, and the Green’s function in the relativistic shutter problem. This is a pure quantum relativistic phenomenon.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss two forms in which the time–energy uncertainty relation can appear. One of them concerns the time of preparation of a given state and the other the lifetime of compound systems. Both will be illustrated here through exactly solvable examples. The first one will be the opening and subsequent closing of a shutter on which we have an incident beam of particles. This problem shows a diffraction-in-time effect closely connected with the first type of time–energy uncertainty relation. The second will be the decay of a compound state described through a schematic R matrix formalism. There one can clearly see the transition between the time–energy uncertainty relation as associated with the interval in which the decay process has been in operation, and as associated with the lifetime of the compound state.
The subject of transient effects in quantum mechanics has been of interest to one of the authors (MM) since long before it became possible to study them experimentally. In particular, the problem of opening a shutter instantaneously led him to the concept of diffraction in time [1]. Physically, it is only possible to open a shutter as a function of time and this complicates the problem greatly, as it is then not invariant under time translations and thus, among other difficulties, the energy of the system is not a constant of the motion. Kleber and Scheitler [2] analyzed the problem describing the shutter as a ±¡function potential at the origin x = 0, but whose strength was an inverse function of time. In this paper, we follow another procedure by adding to our initial two particle channel another one, and make them interact through appropriate time independent boundary conditions at the point of coincidence. The full problem conserves the total energy, but this does not happen if we restrict ourselves to a description in the first channel only. Thus, we have a rough but analytically solvable problem using a Laplace transform, which mimics some aspects of a time-dependent shutter, and compare our results with some of those derived by the different procedure of reference [2].
Long ago in quantum mechanics a discussion appeared about the problem of opening a completely absorbing shutter on which a stream of particles of definite velocity was impinged. The solution of the problem was obtained in a form entirely analogous to the optical one of diffraction by a straight edge. The argument of the Fresnel integrals was time dependent, and thus the first part in the title of this paper. In this paper we reformulate the problem in Wigner distributions and tomographical probabilities. In the former case the probability in phase space is very simple but, as it takes positive and negative values, the interpretation is ambiguous, though it gives a classical limit that agrees entirely with our intuition. In the latter case we can start with our initial conditions in a given reference frame, but obtain our final solution in an arbitrary frame of reference.