Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Quantum tunneling times: A crucial test for the causal program?

James T. Cushing

Published Feb 1, 1995• 27 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02055207

Related papers

Reply to “quantum tunneling times: A crucial test for the causal program?”

Katherine Bedard

Foundations of Physics Letters•Apr 1, 1997•4 citations

Causality and time dependence in quantum tunneling

M. S. Marinov, Bilha Segev

Foundations of Physics•Jan 1, 1997•4 citations

Time for tunneling causality and wave packets

B. Segev

•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICAL TUNNELING IN A CAUSAL INTERPRETATION

Richard P. Feynman

•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

On the Superluminal Quantum Tunneling and "Causality Violation"

Moses Fayngold

This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a signal, are discussed. The argument is presented that claim of superluminal signaling allegedly observed in frustrated internal reflection experiment was based on the wrong interpretation of the tunneling process. A thought experiment similar to that in the Tolman paradox is discussed. It shows that a new factor, attenuation, comes in the interplay between tunneled signals and macroscopic causality.

arXiv:1412.7200•Dec 22, 2014•2 citations

Quantum Mechanical Tunneling in a Causal Interpretation

Michael Clarkson

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations
This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a signal, are discussed. The argument is presented that claim of superluminal signaling allegedly observed in frustrated internal reflection experiment was based on the wrong interpretation of the tunneling process. A thought experiment similar to that in the Tolman paradox is discussed. It shows that a new factor, attenuation, comes in the interplay between tunneled signals and macroscopic causality.