Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Causality and time dependence in quantum tunneling

M. S. Marinov, Bilha Segev

Published Jan 1, 1997• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02550160

Related papers

Quantum tunneling times: A crucial test for the causal program?

James T. Cushing

Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 1995•27 citations

Time dependent quantum tunnelling

G J Papadopoulos

Springer eBooks•Apr 7, 2008•0 citations

Quantum tunneling time and tunneling in time-dependent potentials: A general formulation and some exactly solvable models

Ashok V. Pimpale

Progress in Quantum Electronics•Jan 1, 2004•6 citations

On the Superluminal Quantum Tunneling and "Causality Violation"

Moses Fayngold

This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a signal, are discussed. The argument is presented that claim of superluminal signaling allegedly observed in frustrated internal reflection experiment was based on the wrong interpretation of the tunneling process. A thought experiment similar to that in the Tolman paradox is discussed. It shows that a new factor, attenuation, comes in the interplay between tunneled signals and macroscopic causality.

arXiv:1412.7200•Dec 22, 2014•2 citations

Time and history in quantum tunneling

Aephraim M. Steinberg

Superlattices and Microstructures•Mar 1, 1998•15 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICAL TUNNELING IN A CAUSAL INTERPRETATION

Richard P. Feynman

•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations
This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a signal, are discussed. The argument is presented that claim of superluminal signaling allegedly observed in frustrated internal reflection experiment was based on the wrong interpretation of the tunneling process. A thought experiment similar to that in the Tolman paradox is discussed. It shows that a new factor, attenuation, comes in the interplay between tunneled signals and macroscopic causality.