Abstract Various ways of generalizing classical canonical dynamics are considered. It is found that there exist systems of c-number Hamiltonian dynamics possessing neither canonically conjugate dynamical variables nor Lagrangian formulation. The possibility of a non c-number classical dynamics is then considered and realized. Elementary examples of both types of dynamics are examined, and emerge as classical analogues of a Fermioscillator. This is remarkable in view of the commonly held belief that a Fermi oscillator does not have a classical analogue. Not all possible classical analogues possess a Lagrangian formulation: those which do are of particular interest, since they provide the means of setting up a kind of Feynman principle.
Abstract Various ways of generalizing classical canonical dynamics are considered. It is found that there exist systems of c-number Hamiltonian dynamics possessing neither canonically conjugate dynamical variables nor Lagrangian formulation. The possibility of a non c-number classical dynamics is then considered and realized. Elementary examples of both types of dynamics are examined, and emerge as classical analogues of a Fermioscillator. This is remarkable in view of the commonly held belief that a Fermi oscillator does not have a classical analogue. Not all possible classical analogues possess a Lagrangian formulation: those which do are of particular interest, since they provide the means of setting up a kind of Feynman principle.
In this chapter we set up a classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. The fundamental idea is to set up an analog of classical dynamics in which the phase space variables are non-commutative, and the basic tool that allows one to accomplish this is cyclic invariance under a trace. Since no assumptions about commutativity of the phase space variables (such as canonical commutators/anticommutators) are made at this stage, the dynamics that we set up is not the same as standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical behavior will be seen to emerge only when, in Chapters 4 and 5, we study the statistical mechanics of the classical matrix dynamics formulated here. In Section 1.1, we introduce our basic notation for bosonic and fermionic matrices, and give the cyclic identities that will be used repeatedly throughout the book. In Section 1.2, we define the derivative of a trace quantity with respect to an operator, and give the basic properties of this definition. In Section 1.3, we use the operator derivative to formulate a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. In Section 1.4, we introduce a generalized Poisson bracket appropriate to trace dynamics, constructed from the operator derivative defined in Section 1.2, and give its properties and some applications. Finally, in Section 1.5 we discuss the relation between the trace dynamics time evolution equations, and the usual unitary Heisenberg picture equations of motion obtained when one assumes standard canonical commutators/anticommutators. Bosonic and fermionic matrices and the cyclic trace identities We shall assume finite-dimensional matrices, although ultimately an extension to the infinite-dimensional case may be needed. The matrix elements of these matrices will be constructed from ordinary complex numbers, and from complex anticommuting Grassmann numbers.
Abstract The classical and quantum theories of dynamical systems whose Lagrangians are linear in the co-ordinate derivatives are studied, with a view to clarifying a number of points in relation to Schwinger’s quantum-mechanical variational principle. In particular, linear variations of the dynamical variables are considered, and it is shown that they may be consistently included in Schwinger’s formalism. It is also found to be possible to obtain Green’s generalized commutation rules by excluding c number variations from the theory, for a suitably restricted class of Lagrangian.
One classical theory, as determined by an equation of motion or set of classical trajectories, can correspond to many unitarily {\em in}equivalent quantum theories upon canonical quantization. This arises from a remarkable ambiguity, not previously investigated, in the construction of the classical (and hence the quantized) Hamiltonian or Lagrangian. This ambiguity is illustrated for systems with one degree of freedom: An arbitrary function of the constants of motion can be introduced into this construction. For example, the nonrelativistic and relativistic free particles follow identical classical trajectories, but the Hamiltonians or Lagrangians, and the canonically quantized versions of these descriptions, are inequivalent. Inequivalent descriptions of other systems, such as the harmonic oscillator, are also readily obtained.
This thesis is concerned with the properties of dynamical systems with Hamiltonians which are general quadratic combinations of classical or quantum canonical variables or of Boson or Fermion annihilation and creation operators.Chapter I, consisting of six sections, deals mainly with sets of canonical forms for quadratic Hamiltonians under the action of the group of linear canonical transformations.By viewing the group of C.C.R.Bogoliubov transformations as Sp(2tf, i?) , a full set of canonical Boson Hamiltonians, labelled by the invariants for symplectic conjugacy classes, is obtained.Since the conjugacy class of a real orthogonal matrix is determined by its eigenvalues, there is only one type of canonical form for quadratic Fermion Hamiltonians.Unlike the Fermion case, indefinite Boson Hamiltonians can not in general be reduced to a sum of quasi-particle number operators.However, it is shown how spectral theory in Krein space rigorizes the full reduction of a strictly positive quadratic Boson Hamiltonian for which the single particle space is infinite dimensional.In the case of infinite degrees of freedom, there are various existence criteria for a unitary operator which implements a given Bogoliubov transformation and the equivalence of these is discussed in Section 6.Cahpter II, consisting of seven sections, applies the techniques of Chapter I to algebraic quantization.The Boson commutation relations , among formal mode operators obtained in heuristic quantization, are shown to be incompatible with the canonical commutation relations among conjugate variables unless the motion is stable.Segal quantization of any real
We start by rewriting classical mechanics in a quantum mechanical fashion and point out that the only difference with quantum theory re- sides at one point. There is a classical analogon of the collapse of the wavefunction and an extension of the usual Born rule is proposed which might solve this problem. We work only with algebra’s over the real (com- plex) numbers, general number fields of finite characteristic allowing for finite dimensional representations of the commutation relations are not considered given that such fields are not well ordered and do not give rise to a well defined probability interpretation. Our theory generalizes however to discrete spacetimes and finite dimensional algebra’s. Looking at physics this way, spacetime itself distinguishes itself algebraically by means of well chosen commutation relations and there is further nothing special about it meaning it has also a particle interpretation just like any other dynamical variable. Likewise, there is no reason for the dynamics to be Hamiltonian and therefore we have a nonconservative formulation of quantum physics at hand. The harmonic oscillator (amongst few oth- ers) distinguishes itself because the algebra forms a finite dimensional Lie algebra; the classical and quantum (discrete) harmonic oscillator are stud- ied in a some more generality and examples are given which are neither classical, nor quantum.
A generalization of quantum mechanics is given in which the central mathematical concept is the analogue of the action in classical mechanics. It is therefore applicable to mechanical systems whose equations of motion cannot be put into Hamiltonian form. It is only required that some form of least action principle be available. It is shown that if the action is the time integral of a function of velocity and position (that is, if a Lagrangian exists), the generalization reduces to the usual form of quantum mechanics. In the classical limit, the quantum equations go over into the corresponding classical ones, with the same action function. As a special problem, because of its application to electrodynamics, and because the results serve as a confirmation of the proposed generalization, the interaction of two systems through the agency of an intermediate harmonic oscillator is discussed in detail. It is shown that in quantum mechanics, just as in classical mechanics, under certain circumstances the oscillator can be completely eliminated, its place being taken by a direct, but, in general, not instantaneous, interaction between the two systems. The work is non-relativistic throughout.