The method of quantum annealing (QA) is a promising way for solving many optimization problems in both classical and quantum information theory. The main advantage of this approach, compared with the gate model, is the robustness of the operations against errors originated from both external controls and the environment. In this work, we succeed in demonstrating experimentally an application of the method of QA to a simplified version of the traveling salesman problem by simulating the corresponding Schr\"odinger evolution with a NMR quantum simulator. The experimental results unambiguously yielded the optimal traveling route, in good agreement with the theoretical prediction.
The method of quantum annealing (QA) is a promising way for solving many optimization problems in both classical and quantum information theory. The main advantage of this approach, compared with the gate model, is the robustness of the operations against errors originated from both external controls and the environment. In this work, we succeed in demonstrating experimentally an application of the method of QA to a simplified version of the traveling salesman problem by simulating the corresponding Schr"odinger evolution with a NMR quantum simulator. The experimental results unambiguously yielded the optimal traveling route, in good agreement with the theoretical prediction.
We introduce quantum fluctuations into the simulated annealing process of optimization problems, aiming at faster convergence to the optimal state. The idea is tested by the two models, the transverse Ising model and the traveling salesman problem (TSP). Adding the transverse field to the Ising model is a simple way to introduce quantum fluctuations. The strength of the transverse field is controlled as a function of time similarly to the temperature in the conventional method. TSP can be described by the Ising spin, so that we also apply the same technique to TSP. We directory solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for small-size systems and perform the quantum Monte Carlo simulation for large-size systems. Comparison with the results of the corresponding classical (thermal) method reveals that the quantum method leads to the ground state with much larger probability in almost all cases if we use the same annealing schedule of the control parameters. We also find that the relaxation time is quite short for quantum systems by numerical simulations. We consider this is one of the reasons why the annealing in quantum systems have a better performance of finding the optimal state in comparison with classical systems.
Quantum annealing is a promising tool for solving optimization problems, similar in some ways to the traditional (classical) simulated annealing of Kirkpatrick et al. Simulated annealing takes advantage of thermal fluctuations in order to explore the optimization landscape of the problem at hand, whereas quantum annealing employs quantum fluctuations. Intriguingly, quantum annealing has been proved to be more effective than its classical counterpart in many applications. We illustrate the theory and the practical implementation of both classical and quantum annealing – highlighting the crucial differences between these two methods – by means of results recently obtained in experiments, in simple toy-models, and more challenging combinatorial optimization problems (namely, Random Ising model and Travelling Salesman Problem). The techniques used to implement quantum and classical annealing are either deterministic evolutions, for the simplest models, or Monte Carlo approaches, for harder optimization tasks. We discuss the pro and cons of these approaches and their possible connections to the landscape of the problem addressed.
With progress in quantum technology more sophisticated quantum annealing devices are becoming available. While they offer new possibilities for solving optimization problems, their true potential is still an open question. As the optimal design of adiabatic algorithms plays an important role in their assessment, we illustrate the aspects and challenges to consider when implementing optimization problems on quantum annealing hardware based on the example of the traveling salesman problem (TSP). We demonstrate that tunneling between local minima can be exponentially suppressed if the quantum dynamics are not carefully tailored to the problem. Furthermore we show that inequality constraints, in particular, present a major hurdle for the implementation on analog quantum annealers. We finally argue that programmable digital quantum annealers can overcome many of these obstacles and can - once large enough quantum computers exist - provide an interesting route to using quantum annealing on a large class of problems.
At land, sea and in the air mobility and traffic management offer a vast amount of problems with a large potential of optimization with quantum computers, e.g. service scheduling, route planning, or path optimization. Many of these problems can be described at a fundamental level by the traveling salesman problem (TSP), in which the shortest route while visiting each point exactly once is to be found [1]. The TSP has already received a lot of attention in the quantum computing community, for example, implementations for adiabatic quantum annealers exist and have been tested [2,3]. We investigate the TSP with a focus on going beyond qubits by employing continuous quantum systems. Using bosonic Qiskit we simulate potential algorithms for solving the TSP and compare their performance. [1] Flood, M. M., The traveling-salesman problem. Operations research, 4(1), 61-75, (1956). [2] Martoňák, Roman, Giuseppe E. Santoro, and Erio Tosatti., Quantum annealing of the traveling-salesman problem. Physical Review E 70.5: 057701, (2004). [3] Jain, S., Solving the traveling salesman problem on the d-wave quantum computer. Frontiers in Physics, 646, (2021).
Quantum computing has paved a new way for faster and more efficient solutions to large-scale, real-world optimization problems that are challenging for classical computing systems. For instance, selective traveling salesman problem (sTSP) that is famous in such fields as logistic optimization and has attracted increasing attention from the research community, however, is known as an NP-Hard problem. Solving the sTSP is, therefore, extremely complex because the optimization function potentially comes with an exponential number of variables that cannot be solved in polynomial time in general. To this end, we propose a quantum annealing framework for time-bounded and near-optimal solutions for the sTSP, overcoming hardware limits of near-term quantum devices. In particular, we put forth an efficient Hamiltonian (QUBO) to encode the complex decision-making for the sTSP on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) annealer. Furthermore, experimental results we obtained on the D-Wave 2000Qquantum hardware demonstrate that the optimal solutions for several instances can be attained.
The Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) serves as a standard benchmark for assessing potential quantum advantage in combinatorial optimization. This paper provides a critical comparative analysis of quantum annealing, gate-based approaches based on quantum phase estimation, and hybrid quantum–classical dynamic programming methods within a unified complexity and implementation framework. While theoretical results indicate reductions of the classical O ( 2 n ) scaling to approximately O ( 1.728 n ) for general instances and to O ( 1.110 n ) for structured cases, these improvements remain largely asymptotic. In practice, all current quantum approaches are strongly constrained by hardware limitations. Quantum annealing suffers from embedding overhead and noise, hybrid methods rely extensively on classical decomposition without guaranteed optimality, and gate-based implementations are limited by circuit depth and error accumulation. As a result, no clear quantum advantage over classical algorithms has been demonstrated at practically relevant problem scales. By systematically separating intrinsic algorithmic scaling from hardware-induced resource constraints, this work clarifies the origin of the gap between theoretical quantum speedups and experimental performance, providing a critical assessment of the current status and realistic prospects of quantum TSP methods.