Quantum annealing is a promising tool for solving optimization problems, similar in some ways to the traditional (classical) simulated annealing of Kirkpatrick et al. Simulated annealing takes advantage of thermal fluctuations in order to explore the optimization landscape of the problem at hand, whereas quantum annealing employs quantum fluctuations. Intriguingly, quantum annealing has been proved to be more effective than its classical counterpart in many applications. We illustrate the theory and the practical implementation of both classical and quantum annealing – highlighting the crucial differences between these two methods – by means of results recently obtained in experiments, in simple toy-models, and more challenging combinatorial optimization problems (namely, Random Ising model and Travelling Salesman Problem). The techniques used to implement quantum and classical annealing are either deterministic evolutions, for the simplest models, or Monte Carlo approaches, for harder optimization tasks. We discuss the pro and cons of these approaches and their possible connections to the landscape of the problem addressed.
Quantum annealing is a promising tool for solving optimization problems, similar in some ways to the traditional (classical) simulated annealing of Kirkpatrick et al. Simulated annealing takes advantage of thermal fluctuations in order to explore the optimization landscape of the problem at hand, whereas quantum annealing employs quantum fluctuations. Intriguingly, quantum annealing has been proved to be more effective than its classical counterpart in many applications. We illustrate the theory and the practical implementation of both classical and quantum annealing – highlighting the crucial differences between these two methods – by means of results recently obtained in experiments, in simple toy-models, and more challenging combinatorial optimization problems (namely, Random Ising model and Travelling Salesman Problem). The techniques used to implement quantum and classical annealing are either deterministic evolutions, for the simplest models, or Monte Carlo approaches, for harder optimization tasks. We discuss the pro and cons of these approaches and their possible connections to the landscape of the problem addressed.
We review here some recent work in the field of quantum annealing, alias adiabatic quantum computation. The idea of quantum annealing is to perform optimization by a quantum adiabatic evolution which tracks the ground state of a suitable time-dependent Hamiltonian, where 'ℏ' is slowly switched off. We illustrate several applications of quantum annealing strategies, starting from textbook toy-models—double-well potentials and other one-dimensional examples, with and without disorder. These examples display in a clear way the crucial differences between classical and quantum annealing. We then discuss applications of quantum annealing to challenging hard optimization problems, such as the random Ising model, the travelling salesman problem and Boolean satisfiability problems. The techniques used to implement quantum annealing are either deterministic Schrödinger's evolutions, for the toy models, or path-integral Monte Carlo and Green's function Monte Carlo approaches, for the hard optimization problems. The crucial role played by disorder and the associated non-trivial Landau–Zener tunnelling phenomena is discussed and emphasized.
We introduce quantum fluctuations into the simulated annealing process of optimization problems, aiming at faster convergence to the optimal state. The idea is tested by the two models, the transverse Ising model and the traveling salesman problem (TSP). Adding the transverse field to the Ising model is a simple way to introduce quantum fluctuations. The strength of the transverse field is controlled as a function of time similarly to the temperature in the conventional method. TSP can be described by the Ising spin, so that we also apply the same technique to TSP. We directory solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for small-size systems and perform the quantum Monte Carlo simulation for large-size systems. Comparison with the results of the corresponding classical (thermal) method reveals that the quantum method leads to the ground state with much larger probability in almost all cases if we use the same annealing schedule of the control parameters. We also find that the relaxation time is quite short for quantum systems by numerical simulations. We consider this is one of the reasons why the annealing in quantum systems have a better performance of finding the optimal state in comparison with classical systems.
Optimization algorithms for combinatorial problems play a critical role in a wide range of applications, from logistics and scheduling to cryptography and artificial intelligence. Traditional classical methods, such as simulated annealing, genetic algorithms, and branch-and-bound techniques, have been widely employed to solve these problems, but they often face limitations in terms of computational efficiency and scalability as problem complexity grows. In recent years, quantum computing has emerged as a promising alternative, with quantum annealing offering a novel approach to solving combinatorial optimization problems. This study provides a comparative analysis of quantum annealing and classical optimization methods, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations. We explore how quantum annealing, through leveraging quantum tunnelling and superposition, has the potential to outperform classical algorithms in specific problem domains and Noisy Mean Field Annealing (NMFA) is used to comparisons of all algorithms. Benchmarking various combinatorial problems, such as the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), Max-Cut, Knapsack, and Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP), this paper discusses performance metrics, computational time, and scalability. The findings suggest that while classical methods remain robust and practical for many real-world problems, quantum annealing holds significant promise, especially as quantum hardware continues to mature. However, there remain challenges in terms of noise, coherence, and problem mapping, which currently limit the full realization of quantum annealing's potential. This study offers insights into the future directions of optimization techniques and the evolving role of quantum computing in solving complex combinatorial problems.
Simulated annealing and quantum annealing are algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. The former brings solutions using thermal fluctuations and through classical dynamics, while the latter does using quantum fluctuations and through quantum dynamics. In this paper, dynamics of these two algorithms are compared by means of the Kibble-Zurek argument, employing a one-dimensional random Ising model as an exercise for algorithms. We reveal that quantum annealing reduces residual errors faster than simulated annealing with decreasing annealing rate. The result implies the advantage of quantum annealing over simulated annealing.
The path integral Monte Carlo simulated quantum annealing algorithm is applied to the optimization of a large hard instance of the random satisfiability problem (N = 10,000). The dynamical behavior of the quantum and the classical annealing are compared, showing important qualitative differences in the way of exploring the complex energy landscape of the combinatorial optimization problem. At variance with the results obtained for the Ising spin glass and for the traveling salesman problem, in the present case the linear-schedule quantum annealing performance is definitely worse than classical annealing. Nevertheless, a quantum cooling protocol based on field-cycling and able to outperform standard classical simulated annealing over short time scales is introduced.
Quantum computers use quantum resources to carry out computational tasks and may outperform classical computers in solving certain computational problems. Special-purpose quantum computers such as quantum annealers employ quantum adiabatic theorem to solve combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, we compare classical annealings such as simulated annealing and quantum annealings that are done by the D-Wave machines both theoretically and numerically. We show that if the classical and quantum annealing are characterized by equivalent Ising models, then solving an optimization problem, i.e., finding the minimal energy of each Ising model, by the two annealing procedures, are mathematically identical. For quantum annealing, we also derive the probability lower-bound on successfully solving an optimization problem by measuring the system at the end of the annealing procedure. Moreover, we present the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to realize quantum annealing by classical computers and investigate its statistical properties. In the numerical section, we discuss the discrepancies between the MCMC based annealing approaches and the quantum annealing approach in solving optimization problems.