Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

On the concept of spontaneously broken gauge symmetry in condensed matter physics

Anthony J. Leggett, Fernando Sols

Published Mar 1, 1991• 251 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01883640

Related papers

Emergent Gauge Symmetries in Quantum Condensed Matter Systems

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Apr 2, 2025•0 citations

Interference of Bose condensates: testing the paradigm of broken gauge symmetry

M. Naraschewski, Andreas Röhrl, Hartmut Wallis +1 more

Materials Science and Engineering B•Aug 1, 1997•6 citations

Broken Gauge Symmetry in a Bose Condensate

A. J. Leggett

This paper examines the meaning of the “phase” of a Bose condensate, and in particular the degree of validity of the often used analogy with the direction of magnetization of a ferromagnet. It focusses on two specific questions: (i) Under what circumstances is the relative phase of two condensates well defined? (ii) Would it be possible in principle to set up a “standard of phase”? In the most obvious sense, the answer to (ii) is concluded to be no. As is well known, it is very fashionable nowadays to treat Bose condensation as a special case of the more general idea of spontaneously broken symmetry, which is ubiquitous in condensed-matter physics [1]. The standard account goes something like this: Just as in a magnetic material described by an isotropic Heisenberg model, the Hamiltonian is invariant under simultaneous rotation of all the spins, so in a Bose system described by the standard creation and annihilation operators ψ † (r), ψ(r) it is invariant under the global U (1) gauge transformation ψ(r) → ψ(r)e iϕ , ψ † (r) → ψ † (r)e −iϕ . Thus, at first sight, symmetry forbids either the expectation value < S > of the magnetization of the magnetic material, or the corresponding quantity < ψ > in the Bose system, to take a finite value.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 6, 1995•23 citations

Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetry in a Bose Gas with Constant Particle Number

Alexej Schelle

The interplay between spontaneously broken gauge symmetries and Bose–Einstein condensation has long been controversially discussed in science, since the equations of motion are invariant under phase transformations. Within the present model, it is illustrated that spontaneous symmetry breaking appears as a non-local process in position space, but within disjoint subspaces of the underlying Hilbert space. Numerical simulations show that it is the symmetry of the relative phase distribution between condensate and non-condensate quantum fields which is spontaneously broken when passing the critical temperature for Bose–Einstein condensation. Since the total number of gas particles remains constant over time, the global U(1)-gauge symmetry of the system is preserved.

arXiv:1410.7058•Fluctuation and Noise Letters•Jan 17, 2017•4 citations

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and the Transition to Disorder in Physics

Serge Galam

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2004•5 citations

Spontaneous symmetry breaking in quantum systems

Franco Strocchi

Scholarpedia•Jan 1, 2012•11 citations
This paper examines the meaning of the “phase” of a Bose condensate, and in particular the degree of validity of the often used analogy with the direction of magnetization of a ferromagnet. It focusses on two specific questions: (i) Under what circumstances is the relative phase of two condensates well defined? (ii) Would it be possible in principle to set up a “standard of phase”? In the most obvious sense, the answer to (ii) is concluded to be no. As is well known, it is very fashionable nowadays to treat Bose condensation as a special case of the more general idea of spontaneously broken symmetry, which is ubiquitous in condensed-matter physics [1]. The standard account goes something like this: Just as in a magnetic material described by an isotropic Heisenberg model, the Hamiltonian is invariant under simultaneous rotation of all the spins, so in a Bose system described by the standard creation and annihilation operators ψ † (r), ψ(r) it is invariant under the global U (1) gauge transformation ψ(r) → ψ(r)e iϕ , ψ † (r) → ψ † (r)e −iϕ . Thus, at first sight, symmetry forbids either the expectation value < S > of the magnetization of the magnetic material, or the corresponding quantity < ψ > in the Bose system, to take a finite value.
The interplay between spontaneously broken gauge symmetries and Bose–Einstein condensation has long been controversially discussed in science, since the equations of motion are invariant under phase transformations. Within the present model, it is illustrated that spontaneous symmetry breaking appears as a non-local process in position space, but within disjoint subspaces of the underlying Hilbert space. Numerical simulations show that it is the symmetry of the relative phase distribution between condensate and non-condensate quantum fields which is spontaneously broken when passing the critical temperature for Bose–Einstein condensation. Since the total number of gas particles remains constant over time, the global U(1)-gauge symmetry of the system is preserved.