Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Low Temperature Physics

On quantum interference in a superconducting ring closed by a weak link

V. I. Shnyrkov, V. A. Khlus, Georgy M. Tsoi

Published Jun 1, 1980• 41 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00114891

Related papers

Macroscopic quantum electrodynamic effects in a superconducting ring containing a Josephson weak link

Robert J. Prance, A.P. Long, Terrence D. Clark +6 more

Nature•Feb 1, 1981•65 citations

Measurement of a weak-link Josephson junction in a p-wave superconducting ring

Joonho Jang, Raffi Budakian, David Ferguson +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 24, 2011•0 citations

Radio frequency measurements on a superconducting ring containing a single weak link

Robert Rifkin

•Jan 1, 1976•0 citations

The response of a superconducting weak-link ring to external adiabatic noise

Robert J. Prance, Timothy P. Spiller, Helen Prance +5 more

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Apr 1, 1991•23 citations

Quantum behaviour of superconducting rings

Timothy P. Spiller, Terrence D. Clark

Nature•May 1, 1986•2 citations

Coupled Superconducting Quantum Oscillators

Arnold H. Silver, James Edward Zimmerman

Voltage biasing of a single superconducting weak link results in coherent electromagnetic oscillation at the frequency $\ensuremath{\nu}=\frac{V}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$; simultaneous voltage biasing of two weak links in a superconducting ring produces two strongly coupled oscillators at the same frequency. The electromagnetic phase difference is the difference in the gauge-invariant quantum phases across the two contacts. Because of the quantization of the superconducting ring, this phase difference is $\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$, where $〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉$ is the time-averaged magnetic flux in the superconducting circuit and ${\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}$ is the flux quantum. We can characterize the coupled system in terms of normal modes, and we have experimentally observed these modes of oscillation at 30 MHz. This provides a means of understanding the earlier observations of quantum interference in the resistive state.

Physical Review•Jun 10, 1967•15 citations
Voltage biasing of a single superconducting weak link results in coherent electromagnetic oscillation at the frequency $\ensuremath{\nu}=\frac{V}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$; simultaneous voltage biasing of two weak links in a superconducting ring produces two strongly coupled oscillators at the same frequency. The electromagnetic phase difference is the difference in the gauge-invariant quantum phases across the two contacts. Because of the quantization of the superconducting ring, this phase difference is $\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉}{{\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}}$, where $〈\ensuremath{\Phi}〉$ is the time-averaged magnetic flux in the superconducting circuit and ${\ensuremath{\Phi}}_{0}$ is the flux quantum. We can characterize the coupled system in terms of normal modes, and we have experimentally observed these modes of oscillation at 30 MHz. This provides a means of understanding the earlier observations of quantum interference in the resistive state.