Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Do EPR-Bell correlations require a non-local interpretation of quantum mechanics? I: Wigner approach

Marlan O. Scully, Noam Erez A, Edward S. Fry

Published Jul 6, 2005• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.084

Related papers

Do the Experimental Violations of Bell Inequalities Require a Non-Local Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?

Edward Edward, F�ry

量子光学学报•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

How to Use Quantum Theory Locally to Explain EPR-Bell Correlations

Richard Healey

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2013•6 citations

Bell’s inequality violation with non-negative Wigner functions

M. Revzen, Pier A. Mello, A. Mann +1 more

A Bell inequality violation allowed by the two-mode squeezed state, whose Wigner function is nonnegative, is shown to hold only for correlations among dynamical variables that cannot be interpreted via a local hidden variable theory. Explicit calculations and interpretation are given for Bell's suggestion that the EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen) state will not allow violation of Bell's inequality, in conjunction with its Wigner representative being nonnegative. It is argued that Bell's theorem disallowing the violation of Bell's inequality within a local hidden-variable theory depends on the dynamical variables having a definite value---assigned by the local hidden variables---even when they cannot be simultaneously measured. The analysis leads us to conclude that Bell's inequality violation is to be associated with endowing these definite values to the dynamical variables, and not with their locality attributes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0405100•Physical Review A•Feb 10, 2005•59 citations

Bell’s Inequality and Quantum Gravity: On the Incompleteness of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity

WU Xin-zhong

This paper examines the history of Bell’s inequality from EPR argument to Bell’s papers, and the influence of Bell’s inequality on the frontier exploration of quantum mechanics. It is found that Bell’s inequality has some hidden assumptions that are different from EPR argument. Along Schrodinger’s idea that the measurement process of the EPR experiment requires time, Karl Hess and his follows treat time as a time order parameter, by extending the method of space-time geometry analysis of relativity to the localized geometry analysis of quantum states, it is believed that the reasoning of Bell’s inequality does not meet the requirements of the completeness of EPR argument. Analyzing the non locality of gravitational energy in general relativity makes it necessary for us to seek a more localized expression of relativistic gravitational theory. Based on local realism, exploring new interpretations and expressions of quantum mechanics may open up new avenues for studying quantum gravity. We found that Lorentz almost discovered the incompleteness of general relativity but erroneously insisted on the concepts of ether and absolute space, just as Einstein correctly discovered the flaws in the non local representation of quantum mechanics based on outdated determinism.

Journal of High Energy Physics Gravitation and Cosmology•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

On EPR paradox, and violation of the Bell inequality in local quantum mechanics

V. K. Ignatovich

•Jan 25, 2011•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Nonlocality - The EPR Argument Reconsidered

G. C. Ghirardi, Renata Grassi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations
A Bell inequality violation allowed by the two-mode squeezed state, whose Wigner function is nonnegative, is shown to hold only for correlations among dynamical variables that cannot be interpreted via a local hidden variable theory. Explicit calculations and interpretation are given for Bell's suggestion that the EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen) state will not allow violation of Bell's inequality, in conjunction with its Wigner representative being nonnegative. It is argued that Bell's theorem disallowing the violation of Bell's inequality within a local hidden-variable theory depends on the dynamical variables having a definite value---assigned by the local hidden variables---even when they cannot be simultaneously measured. The analysis leads us to conclude that Bell's inequality violation is to be associated with endowing these definite values to the dynamical variables, and not with their locality attributes.
This paper examines the history of Bell’s inequality from EPR argument to Bell’s papers, and the influence of Bell’s inequality on the frontier exploration of quantum mechanics. It is found that Bell’s inequality has some hidden assumptions that are different from EPR argument. Along Schrodinger’s idea that the measurement process of the EPR experiment requires time, Karl Hess and his follows treat time as a time order parameter, by extending the method of space-time geometry analysis of relativity to the localized geometry analysis of quantum states, it is believed that the reasoning of Bell’s inequality does not meet the requirements of the completeness of EPR argument. Analyzing the non locality of gravitational energy in general relativity makes it necessary for us to seek a more localized expression of relativistic gravitational theory. Based on local realism, exploring new interpretations and expressions of quantum mechanics may open up new avenues for studying quantum gravity. We found that Lorentz almost discovered the incompleteness of general relativity but erroneously insisted on the concepts of ether and absolute space, just as Einstein correctly discovered the flaws in the non local representation of quantum mechanics based on outdated determinism.