Physica Scripta

Foundations of quantum mechanics?

Göran Lindblad

Published Jun 28, 2011• 30 citations

Abstract

Does quantum mechanics have unsolved foundational problems? Is there a dividing line between the quantum and classical descriptions of the world? In this paper, I give an elementary introduction to the mathematical aspects of quantum and classical models which have prompted such questions.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/84/01/018501

Related papers

Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Robert W. Spekkens

The field of quantum foundations seeks to answer questions such as: What do the elements of the mathematical formalism of quantum theory represent? From what physical principles can the formalism be derived? What are the precise ways in which a quantum world differs from a classical world and other possible worlds? These lectures will cover some important foundational topics which touch upon these questions, in particular, operational and realist interpretations of the formalism, the quantum measurement problem, nonlocality and contextuality.

Jan 1, 20160 citations

The Many Classical Faces of Quantum Structures

Chris Heunen

Interpretational problems with quantum mechanics can be phrased precisely by only talking about empirically accessible information. This prompts a mathematical reformulation of quantum mechanics in terms of classical mechanics. We survey this programme in terms of algebraic quantum theory.

arXiv:1412.2177EntropyMar 29, 201715 citations

Some Thoughts on the Unification of Quantum and Classical Mechanics

Norman Graves

The paper discusses some of the issues related to the unification of quantum theory with classical theory with the aim of providing pointers as to how to go about achieving this.

Jun 1, 20200 citations

Decoherence, quantum Darwinism, and the generic emergence of our objective classical reality

Paul A. Knott

In this article I aim to provide an intuitive and non-technical introduction to decoherence and quantum Darwinism. Together these theories explain how our classical reality emerges from an underlying quantum mechanical description. Here I focus on two aspects of this and explain, firstly, how decoherence can tell us why we never see macroscopic superpositions, such as dead-and-alive cats, in our classical surroundings; and secondly I describe and then provide a resolution to the so-called preferred basis problem. I then introduce recent results demonstrating that certain aspects of classicality are generic phenomena that emerge from the basic mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. This is in stark contrast to previous work in this field that focused on specific models that cannot realistically be scaled up to explicitly answer questions about the macroscopic world. Finally, I demonstrate how decoherence and quantum Darwinism can shed significant light on the measurement problem, and I discuss the implications for how we should interpret quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1811.09062Nov 22, 20181 citation

Quantum Mechanics

Eduardo R. Mucciolo

Now that we went through the math and the notation, we can introduce the fundamentals of quantum mechanics in a formal and precise way.

CRC Press eBooksAug 6, 20250 citations

The Brain Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Unveiling of Material Consciousness

Christopher Giguere

Many open questions or unsolved problems exist in all areas of physics. In Foundations of Physics, one open question, a century old, is how does quantum reality give rise to classical reality. This is called the quantum-classical transition, for which there are many interpretations formally called the interpretations of quantum mechanics. Now, the open problem may be located in physics, but is ultimately a philosophical problem. Physics has been unable to solve this problem with the methods of physics, say mathematics. Instead, the problem is philosophical in nature—the discipline from which physics came about—and so needs (in spite of what many hardcore physicists may detest) philosophy to solve this problem. A new angle on the subject is required; perhaps a different science may be useful, that of neuroscience. The alternative theory presented here, the Brain Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (BIQM)—which states that classical reality is the brain’s interpretation of quantum reality appearing in our collective consciousness—represents a multidisciplinary fusion of philosophy of physics, neuroscience, and consciousness studies to attack this key and lingering unsolved problem in the Foundations of Physics. This paper seeks to provide solutions for two main unsolved problems: 1) the interpretation of quantum mechanics and, by virtue, 2) the consciousness/matter problem, which is an open problem in the philosophy of mind and consciousness studies. This article not only represents an interpretation of quantum mechanics, but is a fairly comprehensive theory of reality.

Aug 12, 20250 citations