The quantum theory of radiation, formulated in wave-mechanical language but in terms of running waves, is shown to lead under suitable conditions to the classical theory of emission by a particle as a first approximation. Non-relativistic mechanics is used, and the limitations of the method are brought out in terms of classical theory. The characteristic quantum phenomenon of the Compton effect requires that the Compton recoil shall exceed the spread in momentum of the particle, and so that the wave-packet shall greatly exceed in diameter the wave-length of the incident radiation; this condition is realizable on any scale of magnitude. For quasi-classical motion just the reverse is required; furthermore, if the motion is to last for a number of waveperiods, the wave-length must greatly exceed $\frac{h}{\mathrm{mc}}$ ($m=\mathrm{mass}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{particle}$). The classical packet-motion arises from combinations between quantum-states of the particle-field system; this fact suggests that the photon is not a fundamental constituent of the field but only one possible aspect of its action. The infinite "zero-energy" associated apparently even with the lowest energy-state of the field implies no electromagnetic field intensities at any point. Whereas for problems on energy or momentum it is customary to represent an incident wave-train by a single typical quantum state, to obtain motional phenomena of classical type a more complete expression such as that given in the paper must be used. The physically empty field likewise corresponds to a mixture of quantum states but without correlation among their amplitudes.
The quantum theory of radiation, formulated in wave-mechanical language but in terms of running waves, is shown to lead under suitable conditions to the classical theory of emission by a particle as a first approximation. Non-relativistic mechanics is used, and the limitations of the method are brought out in terms of classical theory. The characteristic quantum phenomenon of the Compton effect requires that the Compton recoil shall exceed the spread in momentum of the particle, and so that the wave-packet shall greatly exceed in diameter the wave-length of the incident radiation; this condition is realizable on any scale of magnitude. For quasi-classical motion just the reverse is required; furthermore, if the motion is to last for a number of waveperiods, the wave-length must greatly exceed mch (m=massoftheparticle). The classical packet-motion arises from combinations between quantum-states of the particle-field system; this fact suggests that the photon is not a fundamental constituent of the field but only one possible aspect of its action. The infinite "zero-energy" associated apparently even with the lowest energy-state of the field implies no electromagnetic field intensities at any point. Whereas for problems on energy or momentum it is customary to represent an incident wave-train by a single typical quantum state, to obtain motional phenomena of classical type a more complete expression such as that given in the paper must be used. The physically empty field likewise corresponds to a mixture of quantum states but without correlation among their amplitudes.
Chapter I The origins of quantum physics I The Compton effect — a strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation In a series of experiments conducted between 1919 and 1923, Arthur Holly Compton (Figure 1.1) investigated the scattering of monochromatic (single-wavelength) X-rays from graphite targets. He found that the radiation scattered at an angle 0 to the incident beam contained, in addition to radiation of the same wavelength as the incident radiation, a second component with a considerably longer wavelength. The existence of this second component in the scattered radiation could not be explained by the well-established theory of the scattering of electromagnetic waves by electrons. Compton considered instead the process illustrated in Figure 1.2, in which a particle of electromagnetic radiation, collides with a slow moving electron, which then recoils absorbing some of the X-ray particle’s energy. Treating the process as a collision between particles, and using only the (relativistic) conservation laws of energy and momentum, Compton was able to account for the effect completely. However, at the same time, in the same experiment, Compton was using interference effects, depending wholly on the wave model, in order to determine the wavelength of the scattered radiation. So here was an experiment which apparently required the simultaneous use of both the wave and particle models of electromagnetic radiation for the interpretation of the results! The existence of this strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation was just one indication of the need for a radical revision of views regarding the physical world.
Atoms and ions containing residual bound electrons do not quite resemble the simple harmonic oscillator model used so successfully in the classical theory of radiation. However, replacing the atoms or ions with sets of harmonic oscillators of a great number of discrete resonance frequencies and having various amplitudes, together with the results of classical radiation theory, go a long way toward a quantitative description of emission or absorption spectra. The set of resonance frequencies is obtained from measured or calculated energy levels using Ritz's combination principle. The amplitudes are associated with matrix elements of appropriate quantum mechanical operators between wave functions of the two energy eigenstates involved at a given frequency. In other words, quantities of the emitters, absorbers, or scatterers are described quantum-mechanically, whereas the electromagnetic field is treated classically. Such semi-classical description of matter-electromagnetic field interactions became unnecessary very early in the development of quantum theory. It will therefore not be discussed in any detail. Instead, we will begin immediately with the combined theory of matter and radiation (Heitler 1954, Dirac 1958, Loudon 1983). Quantum theory of particles and fields There are various ways to also quantize the electromagnetic fields (Cohen-Tannoudji, DuPont-Roc and Grynberg 1989), of which that performed on the combined Hamiltonian equations of motion for the field-matter system is followed here.
It has already been noted (section 2.8) that high frequency electromagnetic radiation can exhibit particle-like behaviour. For example, in the sensitive type of detector known as a photomultiplier tube (described in Wehr and Richards, Physics of the Atom , 2nd edn, Addison-Wesley, section 10.5), a beam of low-intensity X-rays is detected as a sequence of isolated sharp pulses, such as would be produced by a stream of particles arriving at the detector. As was pointed out, it is not surprising that it is usually high-frequency radiation which travels in particle form; as shown in figure 2.39, a wave group of high-frequency radiation can be compressed into a very short time span. However, when we speak of a particle, we mean something more than an entity which arrives in a short time span. A particle has a definite size, or more exactly it has a well-defined energy and momentum. It was discovered around about 1900 that the same is true of an X-ray wave packet: all packets of a given frequency radiation carry the same energy and momentum. This revolutionary discovery means that we must treat the wave packets as particles on exactly the same footing as more familiar particles such as electrons. The electromagnetic particle is called a photon . There is a wealth of experimental evidence which may be used to define the properties of a photon. We shall be highly selective, however, and simply present two particularly clear-cut experiments, the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering, which enable one to define the energy and momentum of the photon in terms of the frequency and wave number of the corresponding wave. These experiments will be described in detail in section 4.1.
At the beginning of the century doubts were growing about the whole edifice of classical physics, including the laws of mechanics in their Lagrangian and Hamiltonian forms, of statistical thermodynamics, as formulated by Boltzmann and Gibbs, and of optics, namely Maxwell’s and Fresnel’s theory. Einstein proposed that electromagnetic radiation exists in discrete quanta whilst propagating in space as well as during the emission or absorption processes. Scattering by free electrons is a common interaction connected with the absorption of electromagnetic radiation. If the electromagnetic energy is large compared with the ionization energy, the atomic electron can be treated as free. The characteristic features of the scattered radiation have been explained by Compton, on the basis of an elastic collision of a photon with a free electron, where both energy and momentum are conserved. The concept of the matter wavelength holds for both relativistic and non-relativistic particles, provided that the appropriate form of momentum is used.
1: The Birth of Quantum Theory. 1.1: The radiation of an ideal black body. 1.2: Line spectra and Bohr's model of the atom. 1.3: The quantum conditions of Bohr-Sommerfield. 1.4: Waves of matters. Comments. Problems. 2: Classical Physics - Quantum Physics. 2.1: The difficulties of classical theory. 2.2: The successes of quantum theory. 2.3: Problems with interpretation of quantum theory. 2.4: Quantum theory (1930. Problems. II: Schrodinger's Equation and the Interpretation of its Solutions. 3: Schrodinger's Equation. 3.1: The Schrodinger equation with time. 3.2: The time-dependent Schrodinger equation. Comments. Problems. 4: The Probabilistic Interpretation of the Wavefunction. Comments. Problems. 5: The Motion of a Free Particle in Wave Mechanics. 5.1: The spreading of wave packets. 5.2: The initial problem for Schrodinger's free particle equation. 5.3: The Gaussian wave packet. Comments. Problems. 6: The Momentum of a Particle and the Fourier Transformation of the Wavefunction. Comments. Problems. 7: Description of Experiments in Wave Mechanics and the Heinsberg Uncertainty Principle. 7.1: Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. 7.2: The entropic uncertainty principle. Comments. Problems. 8: A Charged Particle in an Electromagnetic Field. Comments. Problems. 9: The Hydrodynamic Formulation of Wave Mechanics. 9.1: The motion of the probability fluid in an electromagnetic field. Comments. Problems. 10: The Spin of the Elctron and Pauli's Equation. 10.1: The magnetic moment vector. 10.2: Pauli's equation. 10.3: The Stern-Gerlach experiments. Comments. Problems. 11: The Hydrodynamic Picture of Wave Mechanics of a Particle with Spin. Comments. Problems. 12: Ehrenfest's Equations. 12.1: A particle with spin in the electromagnetic field. Problems. 13: Descriptiopn of Particle Motion in Phase Space -- Wigner's Function. Comments. Problems. 14: Mixed States. 14.1: An unpolarized beam as a mixed state. Comments. Problems. III: Solutions of Schrodinger's Equation. 15: Classification of Solutions to Schrodinger's Equation. 15.1: Scattering states. 15.2: The completeness of the set of bound and scattering state wavefunctions. 15.3: Orthogonality of the wavefunctions. 15.4: Development of the system in time. 15.5: Bound and scattered states. Problems. 16: Bound States and Energy. 16.1: The three-dimensional spherically symmetric potential well. Comments. Problems. 17: Scattering States and Collision Cross-sections. 17.1: One-dimensional scattering. 17.2: The method of integral equations. 17.3: Three-dimensional scattering. 17.4: The scattering amplitude. 17.5: The S matrix. 17.6: Collision cross-section. 17.7: The optical theorem. Comments. Problems. 18: Partial Waves and Wave Effects in Scattering. 18.1: Phase shifts. 18.2: The spherical potential hump. 18.3: The Ramsauer-Townsend effect. 18.4: The extinction paradox. Comments. Problems. 19: Resonance States. Problems. 20: The Coulomb Potential. 20.1: Bound states. 20.2: Scattering states. Comments. Problems. 21
It is in accordance with such experiments as single photon self-interference that a photon, conveying one radiation energy quantum " h × frequency", is spatially extensive and stretches an electromagnetic wave train. A wave train, hence an energy quantum, can only be emitted (or absorbed) by its source (or absorber) gradually. In both two processes the wave and "particle" attributes of the radiation field are simultaneously prominent, where an overall satisfactory theory has been lacking; for the latter process no known theoretical description currently exists. This paper presents a first principles treatment, in a unified framework of the classical and quantum mechanics, of the latter process, the emission (similarly absorption) of a single radiation quantum based on the dynamics of the radiation-emitting source, a charged oscillator, which is itself extensive across the potential well in which it oscillates. During the emission of one single radiation quantum, the extensive charged oscillator undergoes a continuous radiation damping and is non-stationary. This process is in this work treated using a quasi stationary approach, whereby the classical equation of motion, which directly facilitates the correspondence principle for a particle oscillator, and the quantum wave equation are established for each sufficiently brief time interval. As an inevitable consequence of the division of the total time for emitting one single quantum, a fractional Planck constant h is introduced. The solutions to the two simultaneous equations yield for the charged oscillator a continuously exponentially decaying Hamiltonian that is at the same time quantised with respect to the fractional- h at any instant of time; and the radiation wave field emitted over time stretches a wave train of finite length. The total system of the source and radiation field maintains at any time (integer n times) one whole energy quantum, ( n × ) h × frequency, in complete accordance with the standard notion of quantum mechanics and experiment.