Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica Scripta

Strong local oscillator limit of the operational approach for quantum phase measurement

A. Bandilla

Published Jan 1, 1993• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We address the problem of strong local oscillator limit of the recently introduced operational approach to phase uncertainty measurements. In this limit the operator character of the local oscillator mode is neglected and its coherent amplitude tends to infinity. Thereby reasonable new operators for the sine and the cosine of the phase difference between an arbitrary signal field and the coherent local oscillator field are found which describe an already well-known physical situation connected with strong amplification of the signal field.

DOI
10.1088/0031-8949/1993/t48/007

Related papers

Measurement of very small phase fluctuations by means of the operational approach

A. Bandilla

Recently Noh, Fourgeres and Mandel (NFM) have improved the operational approach to the quantum phase problem substantially and measured the phase dispersion of coherent light down to very small means photon numbers of the order of 10(exp -2). This has prompted many other investigations and clarified some important questions in relation to what is actually measured. Although their treatment is rather general, we confine ourselves here to the case of a strong local oscillator (LO) and reproduce their measurement scheme. Surprisingly enough, this simultaneous measurement of the sine and the cosine of the phase difference is completely equivalent to an old proposal to measure the phase after strong linear amplification realized experimentally by the Welling group. The reason for this rests on the fact, that in both cases the results are determined by the Q function of the signal. This was shown for amplification in and for the measurement after beam splitting by Lai and Haus.

•May 1, 1994•0 citations

Is There a Unique Operator for the Phase Difference of Two Quantum Fields?

J. R. Torgerson, L. Mandeļ

The recent operational approach to the phase operator of a quantized electromagnetic field is applied to the problem of determining the phase difference between two weak coherent fields in two different ways. The phase difference is determined directly, and indirectly by measuring each field in turn against the field of a strong local oscillator. We show by measurements with an eight-port interferometer that these two different schemes lead to quite different outcomes for the probability distribution of the phase difference, in agreement with our theory, but in disagreement with most other theoretical approaches.

Physical Review Letters•May 20, 1996•46 citations

Further investigations of the operationally defined quantum phase

J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, L. Mandeļ

The formalism that we have previously developed for the phase difference between two quantized electromagnetic fields, which is intimately connected with the measurement process, is explored further, both theoretically and experimentally. We calculate the higher moments of the measured cosine and sine operators for certain two-mode Fock states \ensuremath{\Vert}${\mathit{n}}_{1}$,${\mathit{n}}_{2}$〉, and show how the measurement itself exerts a bias on the outcome. We find that the corresponding phase difference becomes uniform over the interval 0 to 2\ensuremath{\pi} only in the limit ${\mathit{n}}_{1}$,${\mathit{n}}_{2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. On the other hand, the phase difference associated with the product of a coherent state \ensuremath{\Vert}v〉 with a Fock state can be random for large \ensuremath{\Vert}v\ensuremath{\Vert}, because of the availability of an infinite number of photons. Several of our theoretical predictions are compared with predictions based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators, and they are also tested by experiment. We find that the experimental results confirm our theory in every case, and this includes tests of the higher moments of the measured cosine operator.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1992•117 citations

Phase measurement of a quantum field

J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, L. Mandeļ

The problem of identifying the dynamic variable representing the phase difference between quantized electromagnetic fields is approached via the measurement process. By comparison with classical optics, certain operators corresponding to the measured sine and cosine of the phase difference are identified, but different measurement schemes lead naturally to different operators. First and second moments of the sine and cosine operators are calculated for a two-mode field in a coherent state. The theory is then tested in a photon counting experiment, for mean detected photon numbers varying from 30 to 10-2 which extends the range of previous measurements 300- fold. Good agreement is found between theory and experiment.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Operational approach to the phase of a quantum field

J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, L. Mandeļ

We examine the problem of determining the phase difference between two optical fields, first for classical and later for quantum fields, by reference to two simple measurement schemes that yield the sine and/or cosine of the phase difference between classical fields. We show that certain difficulties exist even within the framework of semiclassical radiation theory when the field is very weak, and particularly when amplitude and phase fluctuations are correlated. We find that a clear distinction has to be made between the measured values of the sine or cosine and the values that can be inferred from a series of repeated measurements. A corresponding distinction can be made also for a quantum field, although the interpretation is not the same. The dynamical variables chosen to represent the cosine and sine that emerge from the discussion of the measurement schemes commute when the sine and cosine are obtained together, but not when the measurement yields one or the other. These sine and cosine operators have well-defined values only when there is a large dispersion of the photon number. We arrive at expressions for the moments of the measured and of the inferred sines and cosines that differ from most previous treatments. The expressions are applied to optical fields in several different quantum states. Only for the Fock state and for the so-called phase state, which was treated recently at some length by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], do the measured and the inferred moments coincide. Our analysis of the problem of phase measurement leads to the conclusion that the appropriate dynamical variables for the measured sine and cosine depend on the measurement scheme, and that different schemes correspond to different operators.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1992•237 citations

Investigations of the operationally defined quantum phase

J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, L. Mandeļ

We have previously developed a formalism for identifying quantum operators corresponding to the sine and cosine of the phase differences between two quantum fields.1 Our approach is based on what is actually measured in an experiment, and it leads to different operators for different measurement schemes. Predictions based on our theory differ from those based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators. We now present the results of new experiments designed to test the validity of our approach, including measurements of the higher moments of the sine and cosine for different quantum states. The results of all measurements confirm our formalism in every case.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1992•0 citations
We address the problem of strong local oscillator limit of the recently introduced operational approach to phase uncertainty measurements. In this limit the operator character of the local oscillator mode is neglected and its coherent amplitude tends to infinity. Thereby reasonable new operators for the sine and the cosine of the phase difference between an arbitrary signal field and the coherent local oscillator field are found which describe an already well-known physical situation connected with strong amplification of the signal field.
Recently Noh, Fourgeres and Mandel (NFM) have improved the operational approach to the quantum phase problem substantially and measured the phase dispersion of coherent light down to very small means photon numbers of the order of 10(exp -2). This has prompted many other investigations and clarified some important questions in relation to what is actually measured. Although their treatment is rather general, we confine ourselves here to the case of a strong local oscillator (LO) and reproduce their measurement scheme. Surprisingly enough, this simultaneous measurement of the sine and the cosine of the phase difference is completely equivalent to an old proposal to measure the phase after strong linear amplification realized experimentally by the Welling group. The reason for this rests on the fact, that in both cases the results are determined by the Q function of the signal. This was shown for amplification in and for the measurement after beam splitting by Lai and Haus.
The recent operational approach to the phase operator of a quantized electromagnetic field is applied to the problem of determining the phase difference between two weak coherent fields in two different ways. The phase difference is determined directly, and indirectly by measuring each field in turn against the field of a strong local oscillator. We show by measurements with an eight-port interferometer that these two different schemes lead to quite different outcomes for the probability distribution of the phase difference, in agreement with our theory, but in disagreement with most other theoretical approaches.
The formalism that we have previously developed for the phase difference between two quantized electromagnetic fields, which is intimately connected with the measurement process, is explored further, both theoretically and experimentally. We calculate the higher moments of the measured cosine and sine operators for certain two-mode Fock states \ensuremath{\Vert}n1{\mathit{n}}_{1}n1​,n2{\mathit{n}}_{2}n2​〉, and show how the measurement itself exerts a bias on the outcome. We find that the corresponding phase difference becomes uniform over the interval 0 to 2\ensuremath{\pi} only in the limit n1{\mathit{n}}_{1}n1​,n2{\mathit{n}}_{2}n2​\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. On the other hand, the phase difference associated with the product of a coherent state \ensuremath{\Vert}v〉 with a Fock state can be random for large \ensuremath{\Vert}v\ensuremath{\Vert}, because of the availability of an infinite number of photons. Several of our theoretical predictions are compared with predictions based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators, and they are also tested by experiment. We find that the experimental results confirm our theory in every case, and this includes tests of the higher moments of the measured cosine operator.
The problem of identifying the dynamic variable representing the phase difference between quantized electromagnetic fields is approached via the measurement process. By comparison with classical optics, certain operators corresponding to the measured sine and cosine of the phase difference are identified, but different measurement schemes lead naturally to different operators. First and second moments of the sine and cosine operators are calculated for a two-mode field in a coherent state. The theory is then tested in a photon counting experiment, for mean detected photon numbers varying from 30 to 10-2 which extends the range of previous measurements 300- fold. Good agreement is found between theory and experiment.
We examine the problem of determining the phase difference between two optical fields, first for classical and later for quantum fields, by reference to two simple measurement schemes that yield the sine and/or cosine of the phase difference between classical fields. We show that certain difficulties exist even within the framework of semiclassical radiation theory when the field is very weak, and particularly when amplitude and phase fluctuations are correlated. We find that a clear distinction has to be made between the measured values of the sine or cosine and the values that can be inferred from a series of repeated measurements. A corresponding distinction can be made also for a quantum field, although the interpretation is not the same. The dynamical variables chosen to represent the cosine and sine that emerge from the discussion of the measurement schemes commute when the sine and cosine are obtained together, but not when the measurement yields one or the other. These sine and cosine operators have well-defined values only when there is a large dispersion of the photon number. We arrive at expressions for the moments of the measured and of the inferred sines and cosines that differ from most previous treatments. The expressions are applied to optical fields in several different quantum states. Only for the Fock state and for the so-called phase state, which was treated recently at some length by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], do the measured and the inferred moments coincide. Our analysis of the problem of phase measurement leads to the conclusion that the appropriate dynamical variables for the measured sine and cosine depend on the measurement scheme, and that different schemes correspond to different operators.
We have previously developed a formalism for identifying quantum operators corresponding to the sine and cosine of the phase differences between two quantum fields.1 Our approach is based on what is actually measured in an experiment, and it leads to different operators for different measurement schemes. Predictions based on our theory differ from those based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators. We now present the results of new experiments designed to test the validity of our approach, including measurements of the higher moments of the sine and cosine for different quantum states. The results of all measurements confirm our formalism in every case.