Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America

Investigations of the operationally defined quantum phase

J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, L. Mandeļ

Published Jan 1, 1992• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We have previously developed a formalism for identifying quantum operators corresponding to the sine and cosine of the phase differences between two quantum fields.1 Our approach is based on what is actually measured in an experiment, and it leads to different operators for different measurement schemes. Predictions based on our theory differ from those based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators. We now present the results of new experiments designed to test the validity of our approach, including measurements of the higher moments of the sine and cosine for different quantum states. The results of all measurements confirm our formalism in every case.

DOI
10.1364/oam.1992.tujj2

Related papers

Further investigations of the operationally defined quantum phase

J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, L. Mandeļ

The formalism that we have previously developed for the phase difference between two quantized electromagnetic fields, which is intimately connected with the measurement process, is explored further, both theoretically and experimentally. We calculate the higher moments of the measured cosine and sine operators for certain two-mode Fock states \ensuremath{\Vert}${\mathit{n}}_{1}$,${\mathit{n}}_{2}$〉, and show how the measurement itself exerts a bias on the outcome. We find that the corresponding phase difference becomes uniform over the interval 0 to 2\ensuremath{\pi} only in the limit ${\mathit{n}}_{1}$,${\mathit{n}}_{2}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. On the other hand, the phase difference associated with the product of a coherent state \ensuremath{\Vert}v〉 with a Fock state can be random for large \ensuremath{\Vert}v\ensuremath{\Vert}, because of the availability of an infinite number of photons. Several of our theoretical predictions are compared with predictions based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators, and they are also tested by experiment. We find that the experimental results confirm our theory in every case, and this includes tests of the higher moments of the measured cosine operator.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1992•117 citations

Operational approach to the phase of a quantum field

J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, L. Mandeļ

We examine the problem of determining the phase difference between two optical fields, first for classical and later for quantum fields, by reference to two simple measurement schemes that yield the sine and/or cosine of the phase difference between classical fields. We show that certain difficulties exist even within the framework of semiclassical radiation theory when the field is very weak, and particularly when amplitude and phase fluctuations are correlated. We find that a clear distinction has to be made between the measured values of the sine or cosine and the values that can be inferred from a series of repeated measurements. A corresponding distinction can be made also for a quantum field, although the interpretation is not the same. The dynamical variables chosen to represent the cosine and sine that emerge from the discussion of the measurement schemes commute when the sine and cosine are obtained together, but not when the measurement yields one or the other. These sine and cosine operators have well-defined values only when there is a large dispersion of the photon number. We arrive at expressions for the moments of the measured and of the inferred sines and cosines that differ from most previous treatments. The expressions are applied to optical fields in several different quantum states. Only for the Fock state and for the so-called phase state, which was treated recently at some length by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], do the measured and the inferred moments coincide. Our analysis of the problem of phase measurement leads to the conclusion that the appropriate dynamical variables for the measured sine and cosine depend on the measurement scheme, and that different schemes correspond to different operators.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1992•237 citations

Compatibility of the cosine and sine operators

A. Luk, V. Peinová

By modifying the phase formalism of Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], we illustrate the idea of Susskind and Glogower [Physics 1, 49 (1964)] concerning the zero uncertainty of their cosine and sine operators in the phase state.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1990•8 citations

Phase measurement of a quantum field

J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, L. Mandeļ

The problem of identifying the dynamic variable representing the phase difference between quantized electromagnetic fields is approached via the measurement process. By comparison with classical optics, certain operators corresponding to the measured sine and cosine of the phase difference are identified, but different measurement schemes lead naturally to different operators. First and second moments of the sine and cosine operators are calculated for a two-mode field in a coherent state. The theory is then tested in a photon counting experiment, for mean detected photon numbers varying from 30 to 10-2 which extends the range of previous measurements 300- fold. Good agreement is found between theory and experiment.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Operational approach to phase operators based on classical optics

J. W. Noh, A Fougères, L. Mandeļ

Our operational approach to the problem of identifying dynamical variables to represent the phase, or the sine and cosine of the phase, of a quantum field is reviewed. We start from classical optics and examine what is usually measured to determine the phase difference between two fields. We point out that difficulties in phase measurements exist even in the classical domain, and these difficulties persist when the classical relations are used as guides in the construction of phase operators. We find that different measurement procedures lead naturally to different phase operators, so that there appears to be no one "correct" phase operator. We carry out a series of experiments to measure the phase difference between two fields in various quantum states, and then compare the results with the predictions of our formalism and some other formalisms. We obtain good agreement between experiment and our theoretical approach in every case, so far without exception.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•22 citations

Measurement of the quantum phase by photon counting

J. W. Noh, A. Fougères, L. Mandeļ

We address the problem of identifying the dynamical variables representing the phase of a quantum field by analyzing what is measured in two simple homodyne experiments. This leads us to identify operators C${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{M}}$,S${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{M}}$ corresponding to the measured cosine and sine of the phase difference. The predictions of the theory are tested in an experiment in which the input fields are derived from a highly stable He:Ne laser. Photon-counting measurements extending from mean photon numbers 30 down to ${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}2}$ show good agreement between theory and experiment. The implications for identifying the ``correct'' phase operator are briefly discussed.

Physical Review Letters•Sep 9, 1991•303 citations
We have previously developed a formalism for identifying quantum operators corresponding to the sine and cosine of the phase differences between two quantum fields.1 Our approach is based on what is actually measured in an experiment, and it leads to different operators for different measurement schemes. Predictions based on our theory differ from those based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators. We now present the results of new experiments designed to test the validity of our approach, including measurements of the higher moments of the sine and cosine for different quantum states. The results of all measurements confirm our formalism in every case.
The formalism that we have previously developed for the phase difference between two quantized electromagnetic fields, which is intimately connected with the measurement process, is explored further, both theoretically and experimentally. We calculate the higher moments of the measured cosine and sine operators for certain two-mode Fock states \ensuremath{\Vert}n1{\mathit{n}}_{1}n1​,n2{\mathit{n}}_{2}n2​〉, and show how the measurement itself exerts a bias on the outcome. We find that the corresponding phase difference becomes uniform over the interval 0 to 2\ensuremath{\pi} only in the limit n1{\mathit{n}}_{1}n1​,n2{\mathit{n}}_{2}n2​\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. On the other hand, the phase difference associated with the product of a coherent state \ensuremath{\Vert}v〉 with a Fock state can be random for large \ensuremath{\Vert}v\ensuremath{\Vert}, because of the availability of an infinite number of photons. Several of our theoretical predictions are compared with predictions based on the Susskind-Glogower and the Pegg-Barnett operators, and they are also tested by experiment. We find that the experimental results confirm our theory in every case, and this includes tests of the higher moments of the measured cosine operator.
We examine the problem of determining the phase difference between two optical fields, first for classical and later for quantum fields, by reference to two simple measurement schemes that yield the sine and/or cosine of the phase difference between classical fields. We show that certain difficulties exist even within the framework of semiclassical radiation theory when the field is very weak, and particularly when amplitude and phase fluctuations are correlated. We find that a clear distinction has to be made between the measured values of the sine or cosine and the values that can be inferred from a series of repeated measurements. A corresponding distinction can be made also for a quantum field, although the interpretation is not the same. The dynamical variables chosen to represent the cosine and sine that emerge from the discussion of the measurement schemes commute when the sine and cosine are obtained together, but not when the measurement yields one or the other. These sine and cosine operators have well-defined values only when there is a large dispersion of the photon number. We arrive at expressions for the moments of the measured and of the inferred sines and cosines that differ from most previous treatments. The expressions are applied to optical fields in several different quantum states. Only for the Fock state and for the so-called phase state, which was treated recently at some length by Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)], do the measured and the inferred moments coincide. Our analysis of the problem of phase measurement leads to the conclusion that the appropriate dynamical variables for the measured sine and cosine depend on the measurement scheme, and that different schemes correspond to different operators.
The problem of identifying the dynamic variable representing the phase difference between quantized electromagnetic fields is approached via the measurement process. By comparison with classical optics, certain operators corresponding to the measured sine and cosine of the phase difference are identified, but different measurement schemes lead naturally to different operators. First and second moments of the sine and cosine operators are calculated for a two-mode field in a coherent state. The theory is then tested in a photon counting experiment, for mean detected photon numbers varying from 30 to 10-2 which extends the range of previous measurements 300- fold. Good agreement is found between theory and experiment.
Our operational approach to the problem of identifying dynamical variables to represent the phase, or the sine and cosine of the phase, of a quantum field is reviewed. We start from classical optics and examine what is usually measured to determine the phase difference between two fields. We point out that difficulties in phase measurements exist even in the classical domain, and these difficulties persist when the classical relations are used as guides in the construction of phase operators. We find that different measurement procedures lead naturally to different phase operators, so that there appears to be no one "correct" phase operator. We carry out a series of experiments to measure the phase difference between two fields in various quantum states, and then compare the results with the predictions of our formalism and some other formalisms. We obtain good agreement between experiment and our theoretical approach in every case, so far without exception.
We address the problem of identifying the dynamical variables representing the phase of a quantum field by analyzing what is measured in two simple homodyne experiments. This leads us to identify operators C${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{M}}$,S${\mathrm{^}}_{\mathit{M}}$ corresponding to the measured cosine and sine of the phase difference. The predictions of the theory are tested in an experiment in which the input fields are derived from a highly stable He:Ne laser. Photon-counting measurements extending from mean photon numbers 30 down to ${10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}2}$ show good agreement between theory and experiment. The implications for identifying the ``correct'' phase operator are briefly discussed.