Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Elimination of negative probabilities within the causal stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics

Nicola Cufaro Petroni, Christopher Dewdney, Peter Holland, T. Kyprianidis, Jean Pierre Vigier

Published Dec 1, 1984• 24 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(84)90918-6

Related papers

Positive probabilities and the principle of equivalence for spin-zero particles in the causal stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics

Peter Holland, Jean Pierre Vigier

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Jul 1, 1985•11 citations

Action-at-a-distance and causality in the stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics

Nicola Cufaro Petroni, Ph. Droz-Vincent, Jean Pierre Vigier

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Jul 1, 1981•36 citations

Causal stochastic interpretation of quantum statistics

Jean Pierre Vigier

Pramana•Oct 1, 1985•12 citations

Probabilistic causality in quantum mechanics

Patrick Suppes

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference•Jul 1, 1990•11 citations

The Principle of Anomaly in Quantum Mechanics

Hans Reichenbach

The following two questions are examined: 1o Do the unobservable parameters possess precise, though unknown, values ? 2o If these unobservable values were known, would it be possible to make precise predictions of the reults of later measurements ? The answer is shown to be negative; the questions, therefore, are not meaningless, being capable of a falsification. The inquiry leads to the establishment of a principle of anomaly, more precisely speaking, of causal anomaly, which is to be added to Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy. This principle states that the principle of action by contact is violated whenever definite values are assigned to the unobserved quantities, i. e., when an exhaustive interpretation of quantum mechanics is used. The two most important exhaustive interpretations are given by the corpuscle and the wave interpretation; each leads to causal anomalies, though for different places. The causal anomalies can be eliminated by the use of a restrictive interpretation, which separates statements about unobserved quantities, as a third propositional class, from true or false statements. Bohr and Heisenberg have called such statements meaningless, without being able to eliminate them completely; these statements arte thus merely shifted into the metalanguage. In another version of the restrictive interpretation such statements are assigned a third truth value, the value indeterminate, and quantum mechanics is then presented in the form of a three-valued logic. The inquiry is carried through without the presupposition of any philosophical conception; every interpretation is examined with respect to the consequences to which it leads. - H. R.'

dialectica•Jan 1, 1948•42 citations

Probabilistic Causality in Quantum Mechanics

Patrick Suppes

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•2 citations
The following two questions are examined: 1o Do the unobservable parameters possess precise, though unknown, values ? 2o If these unobservable values were known, would it be possible to make precise predictions of the reults of later measurements ? The answer is shown to be negative; the questions, therefore, are not meaningless, being capable of a falsification. The inquiry leads to the establishment of a principle of anomaly, more precisely speaking, of causal anomaly, which is to be added to Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy. This principle states that the principle of action by contact is violated whenever definite values are assigned to the unobserved quantities, i. e., when an exhaustive interpretation of quantum mechanics is used. The two most important exhaustive interpretations are given by the corpuscle and the wave interpretation; each leads to causal anomalies, though for different places. The causal anomalies can be eliminated by the use of a restrictive interpretation, which separates statements about unobserved quantities, as a third propositional class, from true or false statements. Bohr and Heisenberg have called such statements meaningless, without being able to eliminate them completely; these statements arte thus merely shifted into the metalanguage. In another version of the restrictive interpretation such statements are assigned a third truth value, the value indeterminate, and quantum mechanics is then presented in the form of a three-valued logic. The inquiry is carried through without the presupposition of any philosophical conception; every interpretation is examined with respect to the consequences to which it leads. - H. R.'