Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

On perturbation theory in statistical mechanics

Francisco Marcelo Fernández

Published Oct 13, 2003• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We discuss the application of perturbation theory to statistical mechanics both in the operator form of Schwinger and in the scalar form as a sum over states. We briefly consider and compare the use of variational parameters in both approaches. By means of a simple model we show that Schwinger perturbation theory might fail when the eigenfunctions satisfy Dirichlet boundary conditions. On the other hand, the sum over states gives accurate results.

DOI
10.1119/1.1590655

Related papers

Perturbation theory

Giampiero V. M. Esposito, Giuseppe Marmo, George Sudarshan

The subject of perturbation theory in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is introduced. First, perturbation theory for stationary states in the absence of degeneracy is studied. The case of nearby levels, perturbations of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, the occurrence of degeneracy, Stark and Zeeman effects are then described in detail. After a brief outline of the variational method, the Dyson series for time-dependent perturbation theory is derived, with application to harmonic perturbations. The Fermi golden rule is also presented. The chapter ends with an assessment of four branches of the subject: regular perturbation theory, asymptotic perturbation theory, and summability methods, spectral concentration and singular perturbations. Approximate methods for stationary states It is frequently the case, in physical problems, that the full Hamiltonian operator H consists of an operator H 0 whose eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are known exactly, and a second term V resulting from a variety of sources (e.g. the interaction with an electric field, or a magnetic field, or the relativistic corrections to the kinetic energy, or the effects of spin). The problems and aims of perturbation theory for stationary states can be therefore summarized as follows. (i) Once the domain of (essential) self-adjointness of the ‘unperturbed’ Hamiltonian H 0 is determined, find on which domain the ‘sum’ H = H 0 + V represents an (essentially) self-adjoint operator (the reader should remember from appendix 4. A that in general, once some operators A and B are given, the intersection of their domains, on which their sum is defined, might be the empty set). […]

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 11, 2004•0 citations

Perturbation theory in quantum mechanics

Alan Herries Wilson

Abstract The theory of perturbations of electronic systems has been considered by various writers, and the method is the basis of the solution of most quantum problems. It therefore seems desirable that the theory should be placed on a firm footing, and this necessitates the discussion of the convergence of the series of perturbations, which up to the present has been avoided. This investigation is all the more necessary since the wave equation of the Stark Effect has no solution of the form assumed by Schrödinger in his original discussion of the perturbation theory. Dirac’s theory leads to a system of linear differential equations in an infinite number of variables, and 2 is devoted to the discussion of the existence theorem for such a system by a matrix method. In 3 the application is made to the perturbation theory in the case of perturbations satisfying the conditions assumed in 2. In 4 the theory is extended so as to include more general types of disturbances. It is shown that, though the series of perturbations does not in general converge, yet it usually possesses the same asymptotic character as in the classical theory, and its use can therefore be justified.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•Feb 1, 1929•8 citations

Examples in which the Perturbation Method Fails

T. Kato

The perturbation method in quantum mechanics attempts to' solve the eigenvalueproblem etc. of a linear operator H.,.=H o +" V of Hilbert space ~ by means of development into power series of the small parameter ".Although the convergence of the results is usually assumed quite simply, it can.hardly be justified from the mathematical point of view.Let us give some simple examples in which the formal theory is not applicable.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1950•0 citations

On Perturbation and Variation Methods

R E B Makinson, J. S. Turner

It is pointed out that the notation of the theory of functionals and the theorem in it analogous to Taylor's theorem facilitates a compact discussion of perturbation and variation methods in quantum mechanics, both for bound state and scattering problems. With this aid it is shown (i) how stationary expressions required for variation methods may be sought and found, (ii) that the perturbation and variation methods are virtually identical, (iii) that second order perturbations and expressions stationary to the second order may be found similarly, though these are complicated. The form found for the second order perturbation of bound states differs from that commonly used in that it does not explicitly involve the eigenfunctions of states other than that perturbed.

Proceedings of the Physical Society Section A•Oct 1, 1953•12 citations

Quantum-mechanical perturbation theory

John P. Killingbeck

Modern computers have made possible the evaluation of higher order terms of perturbation series. Apart from the empirical work involving numerical calculations, much formal mathematical work has been done on the convergence properties of perturbation series and of Pade approximants which represent them. Some of the modern work in perturbation theory is reviewed in the context of traditional results from the theory of real and complex variables. The two major versions of time-independent perturbation theory, the Rayleigh-Schrodinger (RS) and Brillouin-Wigner (BW) theories, are compared and contrasted, and the alternative techniques for evaluating the terms in the energy series are discussed. The sum-over-states method, the differential equation method and the variational principle method are treated, with emphasis on their inter-relations.

Reports on Progress in Physics•Sep 1, 1977•163 citations

Reaction matrix for Dirichlet billiards with attached waveguides

Holger Schanz

Abstract. The reaction matrix of a cavity with attached waveguides connects scattering properties to properties of a corresponding closed billiard for which the waveguides are cut off by straight walls. On the one hand this matrix is directly related to the S-matrix, on the other hand it can be expressed by a spectral sum over all eigenfunctions of the closed system. However, in the physically relevant situation where these eigenfunctions vanish on the impenetrable boundaries of the closed billiard, the spectral sum for the reaction matrix, as it was used before, fails to converge and does not reliably reproduce the scattering properties. We derive here a convergent representation of the reaction matrix in terms of eigenmodes satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions and demonstrate its validity in the rectangular and the Sinai billiards. Recently, there has been some interest in the application of the reaction-matrix theory of Wigner and Eisenbud [1] and the projection-operator formalism of Feshbach [2], originally developed for the description of nuclear collisions, to chaotic cavities with attached scattering channels [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Such models are frequently used as paradigms

•Jan 1, 2002•6 citations
We discuss the application of perturbation theory to statistical mechanics both in the operator form of Schwinger and in the scalar form as a sum over states. We briefly consider and compare the use of variational parameters in both approaches. By means of a simple model we show that Schwinger perturbation theory might fail when the eigenfunctions satisfy Dirichlet boundary conditions. On the other hand, the sum over states gives accurate results.
The subject of perturbation theory in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is introduced. First, perturbation theory for stationary states in the absence of degeneracy is studied. The case of nearby levels, perturbations of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, the occurrence of degeneracy, Stark and Zeeman effects are then described in detail. After a brief outline of the variational method, the Dyson series for time-dependent perturbation theory is derived, with application to harmonic perturbations. The Fermi golden rule is also presented. The chapter ends with an assessment of four branches of the subject: regular perturbation theory, asymptotic perturbation theory, and summability methods, spectral concentration and singular perturbations. Approximate methods for stationary states It is frequently the case, in physical problems, that the full Hamiltonian operator H consists of an operator H 0 whose eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are known exactly, and a second term V resulting from a variety of sources (e.g. the interaction with an electric field, or a magnetic field, or the relativistic corrections to the kinetic energy, or the effects of spin). The problems and aims of perturbation theory for stationary states can be therefore summarized as follows. (i) Once the domain of (essential) self-adjointness of the ‘unperturbed’ Hamiltonian H 0 is determined, find on which domain the ‘sum’ H = H 0 + V represents an (essentially) self-adjoint operator (the reader should remember from appendix 4. A that in general, once some operators A and B are given, the intersection of their domains, on which their sum is defined, might be the empty set). […]
Abstract The theory of perturbations of electronic systems has been considered by various writers, and the method is the basis of the solution of most quantum problems. It therefore seems desirable that the theory should be placed on a firm footing, and this necessitates the discussion of the convergence of the series of perturbations, which up to the present has been avoided. This investigation is all the more necessary since the wave equation of the Stark Effect has no solution of the form assumed by Schrödinger in his original discussion of the perturbation theory. Dirac’s theory leads to a system of linear differential equations in an infinite number of variables, and 2 is devoted to the discussion of the existence theorem for such a system by a matrix method. In 3 the application is made to the perturbation theory in the case of perturbations satisfying the conditions assumed in 2. In 4 the theory is extended so as to include more general types of disturbances. It is shown that, though the series of perturbations does not in general converge, yet it usually possesses the same asymptotic character as in the classical theory, and its use can therefore be justified.
It is pointed out that the notation of the theory of functionals and the theorem in it analogous to Taylor's theorem facilitates a compact discussion of perturbation and variation methods in quantum mechanics, both for bound state and scattering problems. With this aid it is shown (i) how stationary expressions required for variation methods may be sought and found, (ii) that the perturbation and variation methods are virtually identical, (iii) that second order perturbations and expressions stationary to the second order may be found similarly, though these are complicated. The form found for the second order perturbation of bound states differs from that commonly used in that it does not explicitly involve the eigenfunctions of states other than that perturbed.
Modern computers have made possible the evaluation of higher order terms of perturbation series. Apart from the empirical work involving numerical calculations, much formal mathematical work has been done on the convergence properties of perturbation series and of Pade approximants which represent them. Some of the modern work in perturbation theory is reviewed in the context of traditional results from the theory of real and complex variables. The two major versions of time-independent perturbation theory, the Rayleigh-Schrodinger (RS) and Brillouin-Wigner (BW) theories, are compared and contrasted, and the alternative techniques for evaluating the terms in the energy series are discussed. The sum-over-states method, the differential equation method and the variational principle method are treated, with emphasis on their inter-relations.
Abstract. The reaction matrix of a cavity with attached waveguides connects scattering properties to properties of a corresponding closed billiard for which the waveguides are cut off by straight walls. On the one hand this matrix is directly related to the S-matrix, on the other hand it can be expressed by a spectral sum over all eigenfunctions of the closed system. However, in the physically relevant situation where these eigenfunctions vanish on the impenetrable boundaries of the closed billiard, the spectral sum for the reaction matrix, as it was used before, fails to converge and does not reliably reproduce the scattering properties. We derive here a convergent representation of the reaction matrix in terms of eigenmodes satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions and demonstrate its validity in the rectangular and the Sinai billiards. Recently, there has been some interest in the application of the reaction-matrix theory of Wigner and Eisenbud [1] and the projection-operator formalism of Feshbach [2], originally developed for the description of nuclear collisions, to chaotic cavities with attached scattering channels [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Such models are frequently used as paradigms