Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica C Superconductivity

One- and two-particle excitations in doped Hubbard models

Wolfram Brenig, A. P. Kampf

Published Dec 1, 1994• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0921-4534(94)92341-8

Related papers

One- and Two-Particle Excitations in Doped Mott-Hubbard Insulators

Peter Horsch, W. Stephan

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 1993•1 citation

Comment on “One-Particle Excitation of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model”

Behnam Farid

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 15, 1999•1 citation

Comment on “One-Particle Excitation of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model”

Satoshi Fujimoto

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 15, 1998•2 citations

Comment on “One-Particle Excitation of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model”

Osamu Narikiyo, Satoshi Fujimoto

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 15, 1998•2 citations

Comment on “One-Particle Excitation of the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model”

Osamu Narikiyo

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 15, 1998•1 citation

Doping evolution of spin and charge excitations in the Hubbard model

Y. F. Kung, Elizabeth Nowadnick, Chunjing Jia +4 more

To shed light on how electronic correlations vary across the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors, we examine the doping evolution of spin and charge excitations in the single-band Hubbard model using determinant quantum Monte Carlo (DQMC). In the single-particle response, we observe that the effects of correlations weaken rapidly with doping, such that one may expect the random phase approximation (RPA) to provide an adequate description of the two-particle response. In contrast, when compared to RPA, we find that significant residual correlations in the two-particle excitations persist up to 40% hole and 15% electron doping (the range of dopings achieved in the cuprates). These fundamental differences between the doping evolution of single- and multiparticle renormalizations show that conclusions drawn from single-particle processes cannot necessarily be applied to multiparticle excitations. Eventually, the system smoothly transitions via a momentum-dependent crossover into a weakly correlated metallic state where the spin and charge excitation spectra exhibit similar behavior and where RPA provides an adequate description.

arXiv:1509.04754•Physical Review B•Nov 5, 2015•36 citations
To shed light on how electronic correlations vary across the phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors, we examine the doping evolution of spin and charge excitations in the single-band Hubbard model using determinant quantum Monte Carlo (DQMC). In the single-particle response, we observe that the effects of correlations weaken rapidly with doping, such that one may expect the random phase approximation (RPA) to provide an adequate description of the two-particle response. In contrast, when compared to RPA, we find that significant residual correlations in the two-particle excitations persist up to 40% hole and 15% electron doping (the range of dopings achieved in the cuprates). These fundamental differences between the doping evolution of single- and multiparticle renormalizations show that conclusions drawn from single-particle processes cannot necessarily be applied to multiparticle excitations. Eventually, the system smoothly transitions via a momentum-dependent crossover into a weakly correlated metallic state where the spin and charge excitation spectra exhibit similar behavior and where RPA provides an adequate description.