Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Elsevier eBooks

Superconductivity and Quantum Fluids

Published Jan 1, 1970• 42 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/c2013-0-02179-2

Related papers

Quantum fluid as a common model for superfluidity and superconductivity

Nobuo Mikoshiba

Il Nuovo Cimento•Mar 1, 1957•1 citation

Superfluidity and Superconductivity

WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE) eBooks•Aug 1, 2023•42 citations

Gauge-invariant microscopic kinetic theory of superconductivity in response to electromagnetic fields

Fan Yang, M. W. Wu

Within a gauge-invariant microscopic kinetic theory, we study the electromagnetic response in the superconducting states. Both superfluid and normal-fluid dynamics are involved. We predict that the normal fluid is present only when the excited superconducting velocity ${v}_{s}$ is larger than a threshold ${v}_{L}=|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}|/{k}_{F}$. Interestingly, with the normal fluid, we find that there exists friction between the normal-fluid and superfluid currents. Due to this friction, part of the superfluid becomes viscous. Therefore a three-fluid model, normal fluid and nonviscous and viscous superfluids, is proposed. For the stationary magnetic response, at ${v}_{s}<{v}_{L}$ with only the nonviscous superfluid, the Meissner supercurrent is excited and the gap equation can be reduced to the Ginzburg-Landau equation. At ${v}_{s}\ensuremath{\ge}{v}_{L}$, with the normal fluid and nonviscous and viscous superfluids, in addition to the directly excited Meissner supercurrent in the superfluid, a normal-fluid current is also induced through the friction drag with the viscous superfluid current. Due to the normal-fluid and viscous-superfluid currents, the penetration depth is influenced by the scattering effect. In addition, a modified Ginzburg-Landau equation is proposed. We predict an exotic phase in which both the resistivity and superconducting gap are finite. As for the optical response, the excited ${v}_{s}$ oscillates with time. When ${v}_{s}<{v}_{L}$, only the nonviscous superfluid is present, whereas at ${v}_{s}\ensuremath{\ge}{v}_{L}$, normal fluid and nonviscous and viscous superfluids are present. We show that the excited normal-fluid current exhibits the Drude-model behavior, while the superfluid current consists of the Meissner supercurrent and Bogoliubov quasiparticle current. Due to the friction between the superfluid and normal-fluid currents, the optical conductivity is captured by the three-fluid model. Finally, we also study the optical excitation of the Higgs mode. By comparing the contributions from the drive and Anderson-pseudospin pump effects, we find that the drive effect is dominant at finite temperature whereas at zero temperature, both effects contribute.

arXiv:1807.03414•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Sep 10, 2018•26 citations

Superconductivity and superfluidity

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 30, 2016•1 citation

Quantum fluids

David S. Betts

A quantum fluid is one in which energy quantization has a marked effect on behaviour. Sometimes the effect can be dramatic, as with superfluid helium and with the electron gas in superconducting metals. In this article a simple criterion for distinguishing quantum fluids is obtained, and this is followed by a brief outline of the properties of perfect quantum gases. These ideas are then used as a unifying framework, within which some properties of real quantum fluids sre described and analysed. The approach to the subject is descriptive and physical, with very little dependence on mathematical argument.

Contemporary Physics•May 1, 1969•10 citations

Solving the Hele–Shaw flow using the Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd algorithm on superconducting devices: A study of efficiency and challenges

Muralikrishnan Gopalakrishnan Meena, Kalyana C. Gottiparthi, Justin G. Lietz +2 more

The development of quantum processors for practical fluid flow problems is a promising yet distant goal. Recent advances in quantum linear solvers have highlighted their potential for classical fluid dynamics. In this study, we evaluate the Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd (HHL) quantum linear systems algorithm (QLSA) for solving the idealized Hele–Shaw flow. Our focus is on the accuracy and computational cost of the HHL solver, which we find to be sensitive to the condition number, scaling exponentially with problem size. This emphasizes the need for preconditioning to enhance the practical use of QLSAs in fluid flow applications. Moreover, we perform shots-based simulations on quantum simulators and test the HHL solver on superconducting quantum devices, where noise, large circuit depths, and gate errors limit performance. Error suppression and mitigation techniques improve accuracy, suggesting that such fluid flow problems can benchmark noise mitigation efforts. Our findings provide a foundation for future, more complex application of QLSAs in fluid flow simulations.

arXiv:2409.10857•Physics of Fluids•Oct 1, 2024•8 citations
Within a gauge-invariant microscopic kinetic theory, we study the electromagnetic response in the superconducting states. Both superfluid and normal-fluid dynamics are involved. We predict that the normal fluid is present only when the excited superconducting velocity vs{v}_{s}vs​ is larger than a threshold ${v}_{L}=|\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}|/{k}_{F}$. Interestingly, with the normal fluid, we find that there exists friction between the normal-fluid and superfluid currents. Due to this friction, part of the superfluid becomes viscous. Therefore a three-fluid model, normal fluid and nonviscous and viscous superfluids, is proposed. For the stationary magnetic response, at vs<vL{v}_{s}<{v}_{L}vs​<vL​ with only the nonviscous superfluid, the Meissner supercurrent is excited and the gap equation can be reduced to the Ginzburg-Landau equation. At ${v}_{s}\ensuremath{\ge}{v}_{L}$, with the normal fluid and nonviscous and viscous superfluids, in addition to the directly excited Meissner supercurrent in the superfluid, a normal-fluid current is also induced through the friction drag with the viscous superfluid current. Due to the normal-fluid and viscous-superfluid currents, the penetration depth is influenced by the scattering effect. In addition, a modified Ginzburg-Landau equation is proposed. We predict an exotic phase in which both the resistivity and superconducting gap are finite. As for the optical response, the excited vs{v}_{s}vs​ oscillates with time. When vs<vL{v}_{s}<{v}_{L}vs​<vL​, only the nonviscous superfluid is present, whereas at ${v}_{s}\ensuremath{\ge}{v}_{L}$, normal fluid and nonviscous and viscous superfluids are present. We show that the excited normal-fluid current exhibits the Drude-model behavior, while the superfluid current consists of the Meissner supercurrent and Bogoliubov quasiparticle current. Due to the friction between the superfluid and normal-fluid currents, the optical conductivity is captured by the three-fluid model. Finally, we also study the optical excitation of the Higgs mode. By comparing the contributions from the drive and Anderson-pseudospin pump effects, we find that the drive effect is dominant at finite temperature whereas at zero temperature, both effects contribute.
A quantum fluid is one in which energy quantization has a marked effect on behaviour. Sometimes the effect can be dramatic, as with superfluid helium and with the electron gas in superconducting metals. In this article a simple criterion for distinguishing quantum fluids is obtained, and this is followed by a brief outline of the properties of perfect quantum gases. These ideas are then used as a unifying framework, within which some properties of real quantum fluids sre described and analysed. The approach to the subject is descriptive and physical, with very little dependence on mathematical argument.
The development of quantum processors for practical fluid flow problems is a promising yet distant goal. Recent advances in quantum linear solvers have highlighted their potential for classical fluid dynamics. In this study, we evaluate the Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd (HHL) quantum linear systems algorithm (QLSA) for solving the idealized Hele–Shaw flow. Our focus is on the accuracy and computational cost of the HHL solver, which we find to be sensitive to the condition number, scaling exponentially with problem size. This emphasizes the need for preconditioning to enhance the practical use of QLSAs in fluid flow applications. Moreover, we perform shots-based simulations on quantum simulators and test the HHL solver on superconducting quantum devices, where noise, large circuit depths, and gate errors limit performance. Error suppression and mitigation techniques improve accuracy, suggesting that such fluid flow problems can benchmark noise mitigation efforts. Our findings provide a foundation for future, more complex application of QLSAs in fluid flow simulations.