Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Elasticity versus electron repulsion in 1-d polymers. an attempt to determine the ground state

Claude Aslangul, Daniel Saint-James

Published Jul 1, 1983• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(83)90345-6

Related papers

Effect of the long-range portion of coulombic repulsion of electrons on the nature of the ground state of polymers containing conjugated bonds

I. A. Misurkin, А. А. Овчинников

Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry•May 1, 1976•4 citations

Electron Coulomb repulsion versus impurity potential in disordered interacting systems

Poorya Rabi-‌‌beigi, Rostam Moradian, Chinedu E. Ekuma

Journal of Computational Electronics•Sep 12, 2025•0 citations

Electron confinement and long-range interactions in 1-D atom chains

DANIEL T. PIERCE

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 7, 2007•0 citations

Quantum Theory of Polymers

J. M. André, J. Delhalle, Janos J. Ladik

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•71 citations

A Strong Contradiction in the Conventional Non-relativistic Theory of the Ground State Helium Atom and Helium-like Ions

V. D. Ignatiev

In the conventional theory of the ground state of heliu m ato m, any solution of the two-electron Schrodinger equation is wrong! That is caused by a strong imbalance of proportions of the attraction versus repulsion operators' acting on a wave function, in the initial differential Schrodinger equation and in its integral algebraic form. In the differential equation, the attraction operators act on the radial part of wave function independently fro m one another obeying the true proportion: one attraction versus one repulsion per electron. But the resulting wave function turns out to satisfy the wrong integral proportion: two attraction energies versus one repulsion energy per electron. The underlying contradiction is un-coincidence of the additivity rules of energies and energy operators: whereas energies of the electrons may be summed the corresponding energy operators referred to different electrons may not. Consequences of this principal contradiction are d iscussed.

International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Fermion Sign Problem: Mechanism, Guarantee, and Solution

卓冰 蒋

We prove that when two identical localized sources attempt to occupy the same normal mode of a nonlinear elastic medium, the doubling of the displacement field couples with the density-dependent stiffness to produce an excess elastic energy. This excess energy is derived analytically as a function of the separation distance, yielding an effective finite-range repulsive potential that decays exponentially in the far field and is regularized by nonlinear hardening in the near field. The result provides a mechanical formulation of Pauli repulsion without invoking algebraic antisymmetrization, offering an alternative mathematical pathway for many-body ground-state calculations that avoids the fermion sign problem at the foundational level.

•Jun 7, 2026•0 citations
In the conventional theory of the ground state of heliu m ato m, any solution of the two-electron Schrodinger equation is wrong! That is caused by a strong imbalance of proportions of the attraction versus repulsion operators' acting on a wave function, in the initial differential Schrodinger equation and in its integral algebraic form. In the differential equation, the attraction operators act on the radial part of wave function independently fro m one another obeying the true proportion: one attraction versus one repulsion per electron. But the resulting wave function turns out to satisfy the wrong integral proportion: two attraction energies versus one repulsion energy per electron. The underlying contradiction is un-coincidence of the additivity rules of energies and energy operators: whereas energies of the electrons may be summed the corresponding energy operators referred to different electrons may not. Consequences of this principal contradiction are d iscussed.
We prove that when two identical localized sources attempt to occupy the same normal mode of a nonlinear elastic medium, the doubling of the displacement field couples with the density-dependent stiffness to produce an excess elastic energy. This excess energy is derived analytically as a function of the separation distance, yielding an effective finite-range repulsive potential that decays exponentially in the far field and is regularized by nonlinear hardening in the near field. The result provides a mechanical formulation of Pauli repulsion without invoking algebraic antisymmetrization, offering an alternative mathematical pathway for many-body ground-state calculations that avoids the fermion sign problem at the foundational level.